ARTICLES

Filter  
Active filters 0
Remove
  

Refine your searches by:

Collections
Languages

Languages

Countries
Lithuania

Years
2017
2015
2014
2013
2012
2009
2005
2001

Filter  
 
10  Articles
1 of 1 pages  |  10  records  |  more records»
SummaryAccent marks in Lithuanian writings occasionally appear in the Catechism (1547) and the Hymnal (1570) of Martynas Mažvydas. A more advanced system can be observed in the Gospels and Epistles of Baltramiejus Vilentas (1579), who used acute, grave, a... see more

Straipsnyje aptariami Lietuvos TSR upiu ir ežeru vardyne (1963) ir A. Vanago veikaluose Lietuvos TSR hidronimu daryba (1970), Lietuviu hidronimu etimologinis žodynas (1981) fiksuoti šakninio (1 akcentine paradigma) ir kilnojamojo (3a ar 3b akcentine parad... see more

There are two chronological layers of metatonical circumflex in monosyllables, viz. an early Balto-Slavic layer which is reflected e.g. in Lith. de~s, jõs, duõs and a recent Aukštaitian layer which is found e.g. in nom.pl. ti?, acc.pl. tuõs, inst.sg. tuõ.... see more

The major difference between Kapovic’s reconstructions and mine is the huge number of doublets which he assumes for his proto-languages. It is reasonable to assume that much of this variation is secondary and must not be dated back to the proto-language.T... see more

DIE EIGENTÜMLICHKEIT DER BETONUNG SUBSTANTIVISCHER o?- UND (i)i?o?-STÄMME IN DER MUNDART VON RAMAŠKONYSZusammenfassungIn diesem Aufsatz werden einige Eigentümlichkeiten des Akzentsystems der um Ramaškonys, ein Dorf im Kreis Voronovo (Weißrußland), gesproc... see more

SummaryIn this paper, the main etymologies of the first components of Lithuanian compound male names are reviewed and the accentuation of these compounds is compared with the accentual properties of their base words, the modern surnames, and respective pl... see more

Dominant suffixes in Baltic and Slavic originated from retractions of the stress or later extensions and some of them arose in the Balto-Slavic period already. The retraction of the stress in Lith. dùkteri may or may not have been a phonetic development.

The establishment of dominance patterns does not automatically yield insights into the history of accentual paradigms. As in the case of segmental features, it is necessary first to identify the results of analogical developments and to separate them from... see more

The aberrant form of the nom. pl. of Balt. active participles (Lith. vedã? etc.) has been aptly explained (Cowgill, partly anticipated by Endzeli¯ns) as the intrusion of the old finite 3. pl. (< PIE *wed?onti etc.) into the nominal paradigm of the part... see more

1 of 1 pages  |  10  records  |  more records»