Journal title
ISSN: 0520-4100    frecuency : 4   format : Electrónica

Issues

      see all issue


Skip Navigation Links.

Volume 27 Number 2 Year 2012

11 articles in this issue 

Bert Leuridan,Erik Weber

Editors’ introduction to the special issue on the Causality and Explanation in the Sciences conference, held at the University of Ghent in September 2011

Pags. 133 - 136  

Daniel Eastman Little

The paper addresses the question of whether an actor-centered social ontology can admit of relatively autonomous social causal explanations.  It endorses the requirement that social structures and causes require “microfoundations.”  It argues... see more

Pags. 137 - 151  

Jan Baedke

This paper deals with the interrelationship between causal explanation and methodology in a relatively young discipline in biology: epigenetics. Based on cases from molecular and ecological epigenetics, I show that James Woodward’s interventionist account... see more

Pags. 153 - 174  

Francesca Pongiglione

The basis for adoption of pro-environment behaviour is the understanding of causal passages within climate dynamics. The understanding of the causes of climate change is necessary in order to be able to take mitigation actions  (the subject needs to ... see more

Pags. 175 - 188  

Menno Rol,Nancy Cartwright

To what use can causal claims established in good studies be put? We give examples of studies from which inaccurate inferences were made about target policy situations. The usual diagnosis is that the studies in question lack external validity, which mean... see more

Pags. 189 - 202  

Lorenzo Casini

How many notions of cause are there? The causality literature is witnessing a flourishing of pluralist positions. Here I focus on a recent debate on whether interpreting causality in terms of inferential relations commits one to semantic pluralism (Reiss,... see more

Pags. 203 - 219  

Edouard Machery

In this article, I argue that philosophers’ intuitions about reference are not more reliable than lay people’s and that intuitions about the reference of proper names and uses of proper names provide equally good evidence for theories of reference.

Pags. 223 - 227  

Michael Devitt

Machery argues: (1) that “philosophers’ intuitions about reference are not more reliable than lay people’s —if anything, they are probably worse”; (2) that “intuitions about the reference of proper names and uses of proper names provide equally good evide... see more

Pags. 229 - 233