SUMMARY
Biogas production considered the most encouraging sources of renewable energy in Sudan. Anaerobic process of digestion is considered as efficient techniques of producing biogas. The process also a trustworthy method for treatment of municipal wastes, and the digested discharge could be utilized as soil conditioner to improve the productivity. This research work states at the option of using domestic sludge of the wastewater treatment plant in Soba municipal station (south of Khartoum-Sudan) to produce biological gas (biogas). A laboratory investigation was carried out using five-liter bioreactor to generate biogas for 30 days. The total volume of gas made was 270.25 Nml with a yield of 20 Nml of biogas/mg of COD removed. Chemical oxygen demand, Biological oxygen demand, & total solids drop produced were 89, 91 & 88.23% respectively. Microbial activity was declined from 1.8x107 (before starting the process of digestion) to 1.1x105 germs/mL (after completion of 30 days of digestion). This study offered a significant energetic opportunity by estimated the power production to 35 KWh.Key word: Sludge, municipal plant, organic material, anaerobic process, breakdown, biological gas potentialNTRODUCTIONIncreasing of urban industries style in the world has given rise to the production of effluents in huge amounts with abundant organic materials, which if handled properly, be able to end in a substantial source of energy. Although of a fact that there is an undesirable environmental effect related with industrialization, the influence can be diminished and energy can be tapped by means of anaerobic digestion of the wastewater (Deshpande et al., 2012). Biological wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) is a station for removal of mainly organic pollution from wastewaters. Organic materials are partly transformed into sludge that, with the use of up-to-date technologies, represents an important energy source. Chemical biological, and physical technology applied throughout handling of wastewater produce sludge as a by-product. Recent day-to-day totals, dry solids range from 60–90 g per population equivalent, i.e. EU produces per year 10 million tons of dry sludge (Bodík et al., 2011). Sludge disposal (fertilizers use, incineration, and landfills) is often explored since of increasingly limiting environmental legislation (Fytili and Zabaniotou, 2008). The energy present in sludge is obviously consumed in anaerobic digestion. Anaerobic Process is considering the most appropriate choice for the handling of organic effluents of strong content. This process upgraded in the last few years significantly with the applications of differently configured high rate treatment processes, particularly for the dealing of industrial releases (Bolzonella et al., 2005). Anaerobic process leads to the creation of biological gas with high content of methane, which can be recovered, and used as an energy source, making it a great energy saver. The produced gas volume during the breakdown process can oscillate over a wide range varying from 0.5 – 0.9 m3 kg–1 VS degraded (for waste activated sludge) (Bolzonella et al., 2005). This range rest on the concentration of volatile solids in the sludge nourish and the biological action in the anaerobic breakdown process. The residue after digestion process is stable, odorless, and free from the main portion of the pathogenic microorganism and finally be able to use as an organic nourishment for different application in agriculture. Sludge significant coming out from breakdown which allows to yield a renewable energy, that was cheap, obtainable, & no polluting. Sustainable development considered the production of biogas as environmentally friendly and an economic key (Poh and Chong, 2009).OBJECTIVES Sudan have huge tones of sewage sludge from domestic sewage water is accumulated daily in lagoon of soba sewage treatment plant, so this work, we were carried for energy production and treatment of sludge, which constitutes a plentiful waste which ever know any sort of handling after few years from establishing the station.MATERIALS AND METHODSExperimental apparatus: Anaerobic breakdown was done in five liters fermenter. The fermenter was maintained at 35oC in a thermostatic bath and stirred regularly. U shaped glass tube was connected to the fermenter, allowing the measurement of produced biogas volume and pressure. Water displacement technique was used for determination of the volume of produced biological gas (biogas) at the beginning of each sampling. Testing of the biogas combustibility was determined by connecting one of ends of the tube to a gas collection and storage device (balloon), the other end to a Bunsen burner. In the process of reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2) to maximum dissolution in the tube the liquid must be a salty saturated acid solution (5% citric acid, 20% NaCl, pH ¼ 2) (Connaughton et al., 2006).Substrate: About 5L sludge containing culture medium were taken from the lowest part of the ?rst settling tank in Soba station. The moisture content of initial substrate was 35%. The collected sample was preserved at 4oC prior to loading the biological reactor (Tomei et al., 2008). Table 1 showed the sludge features in the reactor with a loading rate of 16 g TS/L, (Connaughton et al., 2006; Tomei et al., 2008).Analytical Methods: The pH was controlled by using HANNA HI 8314 model as pH meter device. Assay was used for determination of Alkanility & Volatile fatty acids (Kalloum et al., 2011). The standard method of analysis was used for recognized the Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) (Raposo et al., 2009). Titrimetric method was used for analyzing Volatile fatty acids (VFA). Alkalinity assay was used for determination of Total Alkalinity (TA). Oxitop assay was used for measuring the biological oxygen demand. Ignition method was used for measuring Volatile Solids (VS) by losing weight in dry sample at 550oC in the furnace, & Total solids were done to constant weight at 104oC (Monou et al., 2009). A method of water displacement was used for determination of the total volume of Biological gas produced (Moletta, 2005). Microbial species & analyses were determined by microbial standard assay. Sample analysis was done by explore of three replicates and the outcomes were the middling of these replicates. Startup of experiments continues until a bubble of gas was detected.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONMeasurement of pH: Figure 2 exhibited pH trends during 30 days with a drop pattern from 7.0 to 6.0 during the first five days; this was mainly because of the breakdown of organic materials and the development of (VFA). Then later, an increasing pattern in pH was noticed to 6.98, for the next week, then Steadying around this pH level was continued till the completion of the breakdown period which taken 30 days. Those out comes were also reported by other researchers (Raposo et al., 2008)Measurement of VFA: Development of VFA throughout 30 days was depicted in figure 3, an increase in volatile fatty acids up to 1400 mill equivalents per liter (meq/L) in the ?rst ten days. This criterion of making of volatile fatty acid is typical to the researcher’s report of identification of hydrolysis in acidogenesis stage (Parawira et al., 2006). The decline in volatile fatty acids after the tenth day was owing to intake by bacteria which would relate to the stage of acetogenesis.Total alkalinity (TA): During the ten days, we observed rise in volatile fatty acids content followed by a drop in a pH in the same time (figures 4 and 5). Encountered to these alterations, an increase in the total alkalinity in the medium for reestablishing situations of alkalinity to the outbreak of methanogens stage (figure 4). Through all the digestion period the ratio of VFA/TA which was equal and lower than 0.6±0.1 were described in figure 6. These ratios designated the achievability of the procedure despite the essential production of volatile fatty acid (Chen and Huang, 2006; Nordberg et al., 2007). The anaerobic digestion process may be hinder by the production of volatile fatty acid.Biogas production: Pressure measurement and biogas volume were used for controlling biogas production. Figure 7 explained the changing in biogas pressure throughout the digestion period. quality of Biogas was obtained with minimum methane of 40% (Bougrier et al., 2005; Lefebvre et al., 2006). Total volume of biological gas production was 270.25 Nml. The yield of biological gas was 20.25 Nml/mg COD removed, which is in range of the others researcher report (Tomei et al., 2008). Biogas production can be calculated from the following formula (Álvarez et al., 2006): Biogas production= (Total quantity of biogas produced)/(Total solid).The COD and BOD removal: Chemical oxygen Demand (COD) and Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) showed a significant reduction of 89% and 91% respectively (figures 8 and 9). Consequently these reduction in contaminants proved that anaerobic process of digestion was an operational technique for removal of organic pollution. Some researchers reported the same results (Bolzonella et al., 2005; Álvarez et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2006). Another criterion for proving the removal of organic pollutants was reduction of total solids (TS), where the drop approached 88.23% (figure 10). Some researcher’s reports approached the same drop (Hutnan et al., 2006; Linke, 2006; Raposo et al., 2009). Therefore it was possible to conclude that anaerobic digestion necessary showed decrease or reduction of organic pollutants rates because of the transformation of organic substances into biogas and accordingly led to the drop of chemical oxygen demand (COD). This could be explained in figure 11 by the comparison of the two techniques during the anaerobic digestion process. That means the chemical oxygen demand (COD) drop should be tailed essentially by Total solids drop (TS).Microbial activity: Figure 11 showed the microbial variation during anaerobic digestion. The total micro flora (total germs) declined from 1.8x107 (before starting the process of digestion) to1.1x105 germs/mL (after completion of 30 days of digestion). Moreover figure 12 obviously explained what was running during the process of digestion in the reactor, microbial species vanishing after the 30 days such as streptococci and Escherichia coli. Some researchers reports explained that there was some sort of relationship between physicochemical and the biological parameters of micro flora with total solid (TS). figure 13 described obviously this relationship of the drop of micro flora which go along with total solids reduction. This intended that consumption and a declining in the mass residue of organic materials created at the termination of digestion was the outcome of the transformation of organic materials into biological gas and also the sum of microorganism reduction. This attained result proved that the process of anaerobic digestion was a good process for decontamination (Deng et al., 2006; Perez et al., 2006; Davidsson et al., 2007).CONCLUSIONSoba sludge’s municipal station carried in this research paper demonstrated operative for biological gas production (biogas). During the first five days, breakdown of organic materials and the formation of volatile acids were started. Volatile fatty acids increased up to 1400 mill equivalents per liter (meq/L) in the ?rst ten days, then started to decline in after the tenth day this owing to intake by bacteria which would resemble to acetogenesis stage. The biogas production lasted until the 21th day then starting decreasing till the last day (30 day) this due to instability of the culture medium of fermentation which became completely poor. COD and BOD showed a significant reduction of 89% and 91% respectively. Another criteria for proving of removal rate of organic pollutants was reduction of total solids (TS), where the reduction rate approached 88.23%. Total volume of biological gas production was 270.25 Nml. The yield of biological gas was 20.25 Nml/mg COD removed, which is in range of the others researcher report. The total micro flora (total germs) declined from 1.8x107 (before starting the process of digestion) to 1.1x105 germs/mL (after completion of 30 days of digestion). Study proved that process of anaerobic digestion was a good process for decontamination. Industries and will be usefulness for bioremediation in marine environment and petroleum industry.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe authors wish to express their appreciation to Soba treatment plant, for their ?nancial support of this research.CONFLICT OF INTERESTThe authors wish to express their appreciation to Soba treatment plant, for their ?nancial support of this research.REFERENCES Álvarez, J., I. Ruiz, M. Gómez, J. Presas and M. Soto, 2006. Start-up alternatives and performance of an uasb pilot plant treating diluted municipal wastewater at low temperature. Bioresource technology, 97(14): 1640-1649.Bodík, I., S. Sedlácek, M. Kubaská and M. Hutnan, 2011. Biogas production in municipal wastewater treatment plants–current status in eu with a focus on the Slovak Republic. Chemical biochemical engineering quarterly, 25(3): 335-340.Bolzonella, D., P. Pavan, P. Battistoni and F. Cecchi, 2005. Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: Influence of the solid retention time in the wastewater treatment process. Process biochemistry, 40(3-4): 1453-1460.Bougrier, C., H. Carrere and J. Delgenes, 2005. Solubilisation of waste-activated sludge by ultrasonic treatment. Chemical engineering journal, 106(2): 163-169.Chen, T.-H. and J.-L. Huang, 2006. Anaerobic treatment of poultry mortality in a temperature-phased leachbed–uasb system. Bioresource technology, 97(12): 1398-1410.Connaughton, S., G. Collins and V. O’Flaherty, 2006. Psychrophilic and mesophilic anaerobic digestion of brewery effluent: A comparative study. Water research, 40(13): 2503-2510.Davidsson, Å., C. Gruvberger, T. H. Christensen, T. L. Hansen and J. la Cour Jansen, 2007. Methane yield in source-sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Waste management, 27(3): 406-414.Deng, L.-W., P. Zheng and Z.-A. Chen, 2006. Anaerobic digestion and post-treatment of swine wastewater using ic–sbr process with bypass of raw wastewater. Process biochemistry, 41(4): 965-969.Deshpande, D., P. Patil and S. Anekar, 2012. Biomethanation of dairy waste. Research journal of chemical sciences, 2(4): 35-39.Fytili, D. and A. Zabaniotou, 2008. Utilization of sewage sludge in eu application of old and new methods—a review. Renewable sustainable energy reviews, 12(1): 116-140.Hutnan, M., M. Drtil and A. Kalina, 2006. Anaerobic stabilisation of sludge produced during municipal wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation. Journal of hazardous materials, 131(1-3): 163-169.Kalloum, S., H. Bouabdessalem, A. Touzi, A. Iddou and M. Ouali, 2011. Biogas production from the sludge of the municipal wastewater treatment plant of Adrar city (Southwest of Algeria). Biomass bioenergy, 35(7): 2554-2560.Lefebvre, O., N. Vasudevan, M. Torrijos, K. Thanasekaran and R. Moletta, 2006. Anaerobic digestion of tannery soak liquor with an aerobic post-treatment. Water research, 40(7): 1492-1500.Linke, B., 2006. Kinetic study of thermophilic anaerobic digestion of solid wastes from potato processing. Biomass bioenergy, 30(10): 892-896.Moletta, M., 2005. Characterization of the airborne microbial diversity of biogas. In: PhD diss. Montpellier 2.Monou, M., N. Kythreotou, D. Fatta and S. Smith, 2009. Rapid screening procedure to optimise the anaerobic codigestion of industrial biowastes and agricultural livestock wastes in cyprus. Waste management, 29(2): 712-720.Nordberg, Å., Å. Jarvis, B. Stenberg, B. Mathisen and B. H. Svensson, 2007. Anaerobic digestion of alfalfa silage with recirculation of process liquid. Bioresource technology, 98(1): 104-111.Parawira, W., M. Murto, R. Zvauya and B. Mattiasson, 2006. Comparative performance of a uasb reactor and an anaerobic packed-bed reactor when treating potato waste leachate. Renewable energy, 31(6): 893-903.Perez, M., R. Rodriguez-Cano, L. Romero and D. Sales, 2006. Anaerobic thermophilic digestion of cutting oil wastewater: Effect of co-substrate. Biochemical engineering journal, 29(3): 250-257.Poh, P. and M. Chong, 2009. Development of anaerobic digestion methods for palm oil mill effluent (pome) treatment. Bioresource technology, 100(1): 1-9.Raposo, F., R. Borja, M. Martín, A. Martín, M. De la Rubia and B. Rincón, 2009. Influence of inoculum–substrate ratio on the anaerobic digestion of sunflower oil cake in batch mode: Process stability and kinetic evaluation. Chemical engineering journal, 149(1-3): 70-77.Raposo, F., R. Borja, B. Rincon and A. Jimenez, 2008. Assessment of process control parameters in the biochemical methane potential of sunflower oil cake. Biomass bioenergy, 32(12): 1235-1244.Tomei, M., C. Braguglia and G. Mininni, 2008. Anaerobic degradation kinetics of particulate organic matter in untreated and sonicated sewage sludge: Role of the inoculum. Bioresource technology, 99(14): 6119-6126.Wang, J., D. Shen and Y. Xu, 2006. Effect of acidification percentage and volatile organic acids on the anaerobic biological process in simulated landfill bioreactors. Process biochemistry, 41(7): 1677-1681.