ARTICLE
TITLE

The Obligation of Notary to Prevent and Eradicate Criminal Acts of Money Laundering

SUMMARY

Notary as general official and as a trusted person because his office has an obligation that is one of which is stipulated in article 16 paragraph (1) Letter F. The Law of Tenure Notary (hereinafter referred to UUJN) namely to keep the contents of the deed and all the information obtained in the making of the deed unless the law determines otherwise. However, in government Regulation No. 43 of 2015 on reporting Parties in the prevention and eradication of Money laundering crimes, notary Public is given the obligation to report to The Financial Transaction Reporting and Analysis Center (hereinafter referred to PPATK) regarding suspicious financial transactions conducted by its clients. So there is a conflict of norms on both provisions. This research aims to assess and analyse the arrangements and responsibilities and responsibilities of notary public in the prevention and eradication of money laundering crimes. This method of research uses normative research methods. The approach which is used in this study are the statutory approach and conceptual approach. The results of this research are regulatory obligations of notary in the prevention and eradication of Money laundering crimes against the secret obligation of the position that these two obligations are not contradicted. The notary is obliged to report to the PPATK, if the notary acts for interest or for and on behalf of the service user. If a notary is acting in accordance with the Authority as stipulated in the UUJN, the notary is not obliged to report any suspicious financial transactions made by his clients. Secondly, the obligation and responsibility of the notary in the prevention and eradication of Money Laundering Crimes is legally notarized liable for alleged criminal acts of money laundering when it acts for the benefit of or for behalf of the service user to objects that are required to be reported, by applying the principle of recognizing the service users, the principle of recognizing the benefit owners of corporations and delivering suspicious financial transaction.

 Articles related

Rangga Prayudha Putra,Ismansyah Ismansyah,Azmi Fendri    

Notary in carrying out his position if violating the law or code of ethics can be imposed sanctions, which are civil sanctions and administrative sanctions. The UUJN does not mention the application of criminal sanctions, but if an offense committed by a... see more


Tegas Hari Krisyanto,Zainul Daulay,Benny Beatrix    

The objective of this study is to determine the opportunities, constraints and strength of evidence of notarial deed in the perspective of Cyber Notary in Indonesia. This study applies a normative juridical method using a conceptual and statute approache... see more


Putri Annisa Aulia,Yuliandri Yuliandri,Azmi Fendri    

In living a life, humans realize that they cannot live alone but need other people and try to connect with others; in relation to legal certainty. One of them is carried out by the role of Notary. The role of Notary which is important in helping to creat... see more


Fahrul Rizki Hidayat,Lalu Sabardi,Kurniawan Kurniawan    

This study discusses the role and function of the Notary Supervisory Board against the notary who violates the code of ethics and notary position. It applies the empirical legal juridical research method that is carried out by examining the conditions in... see more


Josi Hestika Sari,Ismansyah Ismansyah,Azmi Fendri    

This study examine and to analyze article 16 paragraph (1 ) letter C UUJN, namely of obligation to attact fingerprints to the Minuta Notary deed. As for the problem is the reason the parties mush attach their fingerprints to the Notary deed minutes. This... see more