SUMMARY
Diversion is a diversion of the settlement of criminal cases by children outside the court. Diversion is carried out by holding meetings (face-to-face) between the parties regulated in Act Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children and in the Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) Number 4 of 2014 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversity in SPPA. However, there are differences regarding the requirements for Diversity that are regulated in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning SPPA (SPPA Law) and Article 3 of Perma Number 4 of 2014 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversity in SPPA. The problems examined in this thesis are 1) How is the legal certainty of the application of Article 3 of Perma Number 4 of 2014 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversity in the SPPA against Law Number 11 of 2012 Concerning the Juvenile Justice System for the Determination of the Chairman of the Painan District Court Regarding Diversi Agreement on behalf of NANDA DUANDA PUTRA Call NANDA Bin RIN Number 2 / Pen.Div / 2019 / PN Pnn jo Number 3 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2019 / PN Pnn? 2) What is the effort made to equalize perceptions about Perma Number 4 of 2014 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversity in SPPA and the SPPA Law in the application of the Integrated Juvenile Justice System ?. The approach method used is normative juridical. This type of research is descriptive.