ARTICLE
TITLE

Küresellesen Dünyada Birlikte Yasamanin Temel Dinamikleri

SUMMARY

Basic Dynamics of Living Together in a Globalizing World AbstractIn the process of globalization, voluntary or compulsory migrations have become important reasons that make people to live together. Marriages, trade relations, educational movements and tourism have created mobility between countries and communities. Dual citizenship and residence rights, multiple identities and multi-belongings have turned the world into a global society. The rapid development of communication technologies has carried and spread coexistence to all areas of life. The coexistence of people in different geographies has become instantaneous thanks to digital channels. Digital channels enable the sharing of life in every place, with every person, on various topics.Globalization has made coexistence and living together inevitable. In this context, local elements, structures and cultures are torn between getting the benefits of coexistence in the globalization process and protecting themselves from the disadvantages of globalization. The process is rapidly progressing against local structures and elements. Global values have suppressed the local and traditional values in the process of rapid urbanization. New generations are individualistic, self-interested, consumption and entertainment oriented. They live independently and free, but their minds and wills are dominated by the global system.Globalization system is the determinant of the consumption-oriented life, including daily life practices, food, clothing and entertainment culture. Future-plans, family, education and all forms of social relations have been under the domination of global culture. Emotions, social opinions and perceptions are shaped by global media tools. Tools themselves do not cause harm or benefit, the content loaded on these tools cause benefit or harm. Programs and contents are not smart, they are developed and implemented by human-beings that are smart. While the global mind is trying to shape the world in all aspects, it educates and manipulates people and destroys local cultural elements and structures.In this article, the historical process of living together, its social effects, the imperatives it poses and the responsibilities it entails are thoroughly examined and discussed.Küresellesen Dünyada Birlikte Yasamanin Temel DinamikleriÖzKüresellesme sürecinde istemli veya zorunlu göçler, insanligi bir arada yasamaya zorlayan önemli sebepler haline gelmistir. Evlilikler, yatirimlar, ticari çalismalar, egitim ve akademik amaçli yerlesimler ve turizm, ülkeler ve toplumlar arasinda akiskanlik dogurmustur. Çifte vatandaslik ve oturum haklari, çok kimlikli ve çok aidiyetli yasam, dünyayi küresel topluma çevirmektedir. Iletisim teknolojisinin hizla gelismesi ise bir arada yasama alanini ve kapsamini hayatin her alanina tasimis ve yaymistir. Farkli cografyalarda bulunan insanlarin bir arada yasamasi dijital mecralar sayesinde anlik hale gelmistir. Dijital mecralar, her mekânda, her kisiyle, dünyanin her noktasiyla ve birçok konuda yasamin paylasilmasini saglamaktadir.Küresellesme bir arada var olmayi ve yasamayi zorunlu hale getirmistir. Bu durumda yerel unsurlar, yapilar ve kültürler; küresellesme sürecinde bir arada yasamanin faydalarini elde etmekle zararlarindan korunmak arasinda zorlanmaktadirlar. Süreç yerel yapilarin ve unsurlarin aleyhine hizla ilerlemektedir. Hizli kentlesme sürecinde küresel degerler, yerel ve geleneksel degerleri baskilamistir. Yeni nesiller; bireyci, çikarci, tüketici, zevk ve eglence odakli ve günü birlik yasamaktadirlar. Bagimsiz ve özgür hareket eden, ancak akil ve iradeleri küresel sistemin hakimiyeti altinda olarak yasamaktadirlar.Küresellesme sistemi; günlük yasam pratikleri, yeme-içme, giyim-kusam, zevk-eglence ile tüketim kültürüne odakli hayatin belirleyicisi olmaktadir. Gelecek planlari, aile, es, çocuk düsüncesi, egitimi ve tüm toplumsal iliskilerin formati küresel kültürün egemenligine girmistir. Sevgiler ve nefretler, toplumsal düsünce ve algilar küresel medya araçlarinin telkinleri ile sekillenmektedir. Araçlar zarar veya fayda üretmez, onlara yüklenen içerikler, programlar fayda veya zarar vermektedir. Programlar, içerikler akilli degildir, akil sahipleri onlari belirler, planlar, hazirlar ve uygulamaya koyarlar. Küresel sistemin akli dünyayi her yönüyle biçimlendirmeye çalisirken, insanlari egitmekte, sartlandirmakta, yerel kültür unsur ve yapilari tahrip etmektedir. Bu durum insanoglunun birlikte var olma imkânlarini çatisma alanina çevirmekte ve tehdit etmektedir.Bu makalede birlikte yasamanin tarihi süreci, sosyal etkileri, ortaya çikardigi zorunluluklar ve gerektirdigi sorumluluklar kapsamli bir sekilde incelenmis ve tartisilmistir.

 Articles related

Haslinda B. Anriani    

This research reveals the strategy of the people in Palu City in realizing the integration and harmonization among those with diverse cultural backgrounds. This research has an important position considering the conflict that had taken place in Palu City... see more


Irene Ludji,Mariska Lauterboom    

The Indonesian nation with the motto “Bhineka Tunggal Ika” (Unity in Diversity) is a nation that believes in the beauty of pluralism as the primary model to build unity. Therefore, in building relationships that produce social integration, it should be c... see more


Nayeem Sultana (ZEF A, University of Bonn, sultana_nayeem@yahoo.ca)    

Nation is referred to as ‘imagined community’ (Anderson 1991) that bears a common sense of belonging across various parts of a country. Behind that feeling of commonality national culture (of that nation) is identified as a stimulating force that binds p... see more

Revista: Akademika

Anna Vorobyova    

Today the EU and Canada experience a significant international migration inflow that requires a delicate treatment on the government side which would not contradict with these countries’ adherence to a liberal nation-state idea. The non-ratification of t... see more


Val Moghadam    

There is much in Warren Wagar's paper with which I agree. He questions the viability of a multiculturalist politics, draws our attention to the problematical nature of many movements that world-system theory would deem "antisystemic," and rejects "a pure... see more