Journal title
ISSN: 0017-3916    frecuency : 4   format : Electrónica

Issues

      see all issue


Skip Navigation Links.

Volume 60 Number 4 Year 2020

10 articles in this issue 

András Kárpáti

The vase here published allows us to recognize a type, ‘musical contest scenes with hybrid kithara’, which arose in the late fifth century probably to distinguish competitors not yet of ephebic age.

Pags. pp. 498 - 525  

William H. Adams

The symptoms and treatments of eileos (ch. 44-46), interpreted as “blockage” or “retention,” suggest that renal failure often was the underlying condition; this expanded scope of the term helps explain Aphorisms 6.44.

Pags. pp. 526 - 543  

Sarah Bremner

Demosthenes, in criticism of the demos, elaborately evokes an ideal of Athenian past accomplishments and character, as portrayed in the epitaphioi logoi, to shame the Athenians into acting against Philip.  

Pags. pp. 544 - 573  

Tomislav Bilic

Though writing in different genres, science vs. utopian fiction, they shared a common background in Greek geographical knowledge, the scientist Pytheas drawing on myth and the fabulist Hecataeus drawing on empirical data.

Pags. pp. 574 - 593  

Marcin Kurpios

Polybius as ‘cover-text’ marks his citations with distinctive introductory words and modes of speech, which can help us decide when his references to Phylarchus convey ipsissima verba or only substance.

Pags. pp. 594 - 620  

Chrysanthos S. Chrysanthou

Herodian applies to Dio’s text displacement, omission, and modification of context in order to bring out themes and ideas that are essential to his own understanding of the post-Marcus world.

Pags. pp. 621 - 651  

Aglae Pizzone

The Leiden ms. Vossianus Gr. Q1 contains a sizable portion of the Logismoi, whose contents imply that the title means to portray Tzetzes as a metaphorical Grand Logariast, reviewer and critic, of literature.

Pags. pp. 652 - 690  

Kseniia S. Morugina

The ms. Vlad. 431, now in Moscow, was not used for the published version of this liturgical text: it is in the hand of Kokkinos himself (14th cent.) and can be shown to be the proper basis for an edition of the canon.

Pags. pp. 691 - 707  

Almut Fries

Irigoin’s hypothesis that the ‘Paris family’ of Pindar mss. represents an edition by Planudes is strengthened by analysis of Par.gr. 2403, whose hand and whose contents show affinities with Planudes’ circle.

Pags. pp. 708 - 717  

Carlos A. M. Jesus

The Septuagint ms. Madrid UCM 22 = 442 Rahlfs, recently recovered, was extensively reviewed by Marcus Musurus and other Hellenists in both Venice and Alcalá and used for the first complete editions of the Bible, the Aldine and the Polyglot.

Pags. pp. 718 - 744