SUMMARY
The results of the development of tools for scenario modeling based on formal grammars are presented. The works related to various ways of scenario description in their development systems are analyzed. For the natural language description of scenarios, it is indicated that this approach is sufficiently transparent and understandable for users. However, this approach has several disadvantages for formalizing and unifying scenario description. In particular, the presence of a number of ambiguities in the language makes it impossible for the description to be uniquely interpreted, and as a result, unsuitable for performing formal transformations on the description. The graphical representation of the script is a visual representation of the script. Moreover, the visual representation of the scenario in the form of some automaton model can be estimated as extremely attractive for subsequent multi-agent modeling of its execution. The disadvantage of such scenario description is still the difficulty of performing formal manipulations and the need to switch to a more convenient representation for manipulations. Using formal grammars to describe scenarios is a compromise approach that allows scripts to be described in an unambiguously interpreted form. The formal grammar description is also more familiar to computer language specialists. In addition, there are programs focused on working with formal grammars. The transition from the natural linguistic description of scenarios to its formal representation as a standard description in the Backus-Naura form is shown. The change in the presentation form was made using the example of description of the scenario of behavior of cyber-conflict participants in the security system. The resulting script description was used in the context-free grammar analyzer. The results showed the applicability of the proposed approach and the tools used to describe and verify the description correctness of scenarios related to any subject area