Home  /  Akademika  /  Vol: 55 Núm: 1 Par: 0 (1999)  /  Article
ARTICLE
TITLE

Crossing Ethnic Borders in Malaysia Measuring the Fluidity of Ethnic Identity and Group Formation

SUMMARY

Scholars studying ethnic and race relations often locate the question of identity and group formation as given and unaltered (Geertz 1963) while Barth (1969), Banton (1983) and Shamsul (1996) have been arguing that no group maintains itself. This article belongs to the latter academic tradition in having to understand the multi-ethnic Malaysian society not only at the macro but also the micro levels; it analyses both the group and individual alignments, as well as the authority-defined and the everyday defined identities. Data collected from five studies carried out in the Klang Valley and Penang between 1990 and 1998 is utilised to show that universalistic norms of self interest over-ride the concern for ethnic preference. Respondents show that they share some common values and their interactions cross ethnic borders. Pluralism is an accepted social reality in Malaysia and ethnicity is secondary rather than primary.Key words: identity, group formation, universalistic norms, ethnic preference, ethnicityABSTRAKPara sarjana yang mengkaji hubungan etnik dan ras sering mengatakan persoalan identiti dan pembentukan kumpulan sesuatu yang terberi dan tidak berubah (Geertz 1963) manakala Barth (1969), Banton (1983) dan Shamsul (1996) telah mengutarakan hujah bahawa tiada kumpulan yang boleh kekal. Artikel ini tergolong dalam tradisi akademik yang kedua dalam percubaannya untuk memahami masyarakat Malaysia yang berbilang etnik. Artikel ini meneliti peringkat makro dan juga mikro, peringkat ikatan kumpulan dan juga individu, dan peringkat takrifan penguasa dan juga takrifan harian. Data daripada lima kajian yang dijalankan di Lembah Kelang dan Pulau Pinang dari tahun 1990 hingga 1998 digunakan untuk membuktikan bahawa norma sejagat tentang kepentingan diri lebih diutamakan daripada pilihan etnik. Responden juga menunjukkan mereka berkongsi nilai dan perhubungan mereka melintasi batas etnik masing-masing. Pluralisme telah diterima sebagai satu realiti sosial negara dan identiti etnik adalah sekunder dan bukan primer.Kata kunci: identiti, pembentukan kumpulan, norma sejagat, pilihan etnik, etnisiti

 Articles related

Sara Silveira    

This article analyzes gender as a basic element in social relations and in building the identity of men and women, whose inequalities are increased by ethnicity, race, social class, etc. It proposes the gender perspective as a methodology to analyze labo... see more


Wisdia Lola Erwinda,Susmiati Susmiati,Heppi Sasmita    

Background: Dharmasraya District is very prone and vulnerable to drug circulation cases because Dharmasraya district consists of various ethnic and is a cross-Sumatran crossing area so it is necessary to prevent the behavior of abuse NAPZA on adolescent.... see more


Andrea Alejandra Chamorro Pérez    

Las investigaciones realizadas en el Norte Grande de Chile han relevado la capacidad de adaptación y reconstrucción de los entramados sociales y culturales andinos en contextos de complejidad urbana. En este escenario, a partir de una etno... see more


Mark Bolak Funteh    

The notion and function of boundary differed fundamentally in the European and African contexts. In traditional Africa, the concept of an ethnic boundary was expressed in terms of neighbours with whom the particular polity shared a territory and such a b... see more


Abdelmajid Ridouane    

The category of “Illegal” immigrants, in which the present article is interested, is conventionally referred to in the discourse of the United Nation High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) as ‘large scale influx’. To differentiate it from the UNHCR colle... see more