SUMMARY
Shafran L. M., Sidorenko S. G., Golikova V. V., Zukow W. Role of fumigation in labour conditions characteristic of the grain transport conveyor workers = ???? ????????? ? ?????????????? ??????? ????? ??????? ????????? ????????????? ?????????. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. 2015;5(10):350-362. ISSN 2391-8306. DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.45341http://ojs.ukw.edu.pl/index.php/johs/article/view/3355https://pbn.nauka.gov.pl/works/709979Formerly Journal of Health Sciences. ISSN 1429-9623 / 2300-665X. Archives 2011–2014http://journal.rsw.edu.pl/index.php/JHS/issue/archive Deklaracja.Specyfika i zawartosc merytoryczna czasopisma nie ulega zmianie.Zgodnie z informacja MNiSW z dnia 2 czerwca 2014 r., ze w roku 2014 nie bedzie przeprowadzana ocena czasopism naukowych; czasopismo o zmienionym tytule otrzymuje tyle samo punktów co na wykazie czasopism naukowych z dnia 31 grudnia 2014 r.The journal has had 5 points in Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland parametric evaluation. Part B item 1089. (31.12.2014).© The Author (s) 2015;This article is published with open access at Licensee Open Journal Systems of Kazimierz Wielki University in Bydgoszcz, Poland and Radom University in Radom, PolandOpen Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,provided the original author(s) and source are credited. This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non commercialuse, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.Received: 25.09.2015. Revised 25.10.2015. Accepted: 31.10.2015. UDC - ??? 613.6+616-099-057:656.6-083 ROLE OF FUMIGATION IN LABOUR CONDITIONS CHARACTERISTIC OF THE GRAIN TRANSPORT CONVEYOR WORKERS ???? ????????? ? ?????????????? ??????? ????? ??????? ????????? ????????????? ????????? L. M. Shafran*, S. G. Sidorenko**, V. V. Golikova*, W. Zukow***?. ?. ??????, ?. ?. ?????????, ?. ?. ????????, ?. ????? *Ukrainian Scientific and Research Institute of Transport Medicine, Odessa, Ukraine**Main State Sanitary and Epidemiological Service in Kirovograd region of Ukraine***Kazimierz Wielki University, Bydgoszcz, Poland AbstractComplex investigations of working conditions of specialists, involved in the export of grain in Ukraine at all stages of the transport conveyor (elevators - freight transport - rail - enterprises for the primary processing of grain and seeds - grain terminals at sea and river ports - ships for grain transportation in bulk (bulkers)) is made. Under supervision there were 755 people, males, aged 27-56 years, with the occupational experience 3-35 years. All workers were divided into 6 groups: 1.- workers of elevators and grain terminals; 2 - workers of the enterprises for processing of grain and seeds; 3. - workers of fodder industries; 4. – truck drivers; 5 - specialists of fumigation units; 6 – workers without any contact with grain cargoes, control. The research included: analysis of occupational activities by professiografic methods (multimoment observations and self-made checking of working operations and time), assessment of hazards in the volume requirements for certification of workplaces (microclimate parameters, noise, vibration, the definition of dust, germs and fungi, chemicals in the air, including phosphine, indicators of severity and intensity of labor), the study of morbidity with temporary disability according to the company’s data and symptoms of health disorders mentioned in a specially designed questionnaire. The results showed that the surveyed workers are exposed to general and specific hazards types of the working environment. It established the important role of residual amounts of phosphine and airborne dust generated during overload, moving under fumigation of grain and seeds at grain elevators, port terminals, as well as containing the germs and fungi bioaerosol as sources of harmful effects on the operators and truck drivers, which plays an important role in the etiology and pathogenesis of occupationally caused diseases in participants of grain transport conveyer. Concentrations of vegetable dust in grain elevators and terminals exceed the permissible exposure limit (4 mg / m3) in 2-6 times, and the phosphine concentration in the breathing zone of fumigation specialists - up to 15 times. The surveyed groups of workers also greatly differ in severity and intensity of labor. On the basis of integrated work assessment of elevators, grain terminals personnel and specialists in fumigation assigned to class 3.2, animal feed mills workers of and truck drivers – to class 3.1, and workers of the enterprises for processing of grain and seeds - to the 3.1 - 2nd classes in accordance with the current hygienic classification. It is designed and implemented a range of preventive measures to improve working conditions and of the health preservation of workers the grain transportation conveyor. Further researches are needed to differentiate hygienic assessment of employees grain processing industries and the transport conveyor. The necessity for correction of grain dust PEL considering content of not deposited fractions of pesticide residues primarily fumigants.Keywords: grain, transportation, fumigation, phosphine, workers, working conditions. StreszczenieROLA FUMIGACJI W CHARAKTERYSTYCE WARUNKÓW PRACY RUROCIAGU DO TRANSPORTU ZBÓZ. Kompleksowe badania warunków pracy zaangazowanych w eksport zboza na Ukrainie na wszystkich etapach przenosnika transportu (windy - transportu towarowego - kolejowe - przedsiebiorstwa do pierwotnej obróbki zbóz i nasion - terminale zbozowe w portach morskich i rzecznych - statki do przewozu luzem ziarna (bulkers)). Pod obserwacja byly 755 osoby, mezczyzni w wieku 27-56 lat, z doswiadczeniem w zawodach studiowal 3-35 lat. Wszyscy badani zostali podzieleni na 6 grup: 1 - pracownicy windy roboczych i terminali zbozowych; 2 - pracownicy przedsiebiorstw do przetwórstwa zboza i nasion; 3 - pracownicy RSS galezi przemyslu; 4 - kierowcy ciezarówek; 5 - eksperci w fumigacji; 6 – pracownicy nie kontaktujacy sie z ladunkiem zboza, kontroli. Badaniami objeto: analiza dzialan produkcyjnych professjograficznych metod multimomentnych obserwacji i samofotografii czasu pracy, ocena zagrozen w wymogami glosnosci dla certyfikacji zakladów pracy, badania zachorowalnosci o czasowej niezdolnosci do pracy, zgodnie z firm i objawów zaburzen zdrowia specjalnie zaprojektowany kwestionariusz. Wyniki wykazaly, ze badani eksperci sa narazone na ogólnych i szczególnych zagrozen w srodowisku pracy. Ustalono wazna role resztkowych ilosci fosfinie i unoszacego sie w powietrzu pylu wytwarzanego podczas przeciazenia, przemieszczaja sie w ramach fumigacji ziarna i nasion w elewatorów zbozowych, terminalach portowych, a takze zawierajacy bakterie i grzyby bioaerozolu jako zródel szkodliwego wplywu na operatorów i kierowców pojazdów, który odgrywa wazna role w etiologii i patogenezie chorób spowodowanych u pracowników profesjonalnych ziarnotransportowych rurociagów eksportowych. Stezenia pylu roslin w elewatorach zbozowych i ziarnoterminalach przekraczaly maksymalnego dopuszczalne (4 mg / m3) w 2-6 razy, a stezenie fosfina w strefie oddychania odpowiedniej fumigacji - do 15 razy. Grupy pracowników ankietowanych równiez znaczaco róznily sie w nasileniu i intensywnosci pracy. Na podstawie zintegrowanej oceny pracy ekspertów w fumigacji przypisane do klasy 3.2, pracownicy elewatorów zbozowych, terminale zboza, produkcji pasz, kierowcy ciezkich pojazdów - do klasy 3.1 i pracownicy przedsiebiorstw do przetwórstwa zbóz i nasion - do 3,1-2.0 klasom obecnej klasyfikacji higienicznej. Zaprojektowalismy i wdrozylismy szereg srodków majacych na celu poprawe warunków pracy i ochrone zdrowia pracowników ziarnotransportowego przenosnika. Konieczne sa dalsze badania, aby odróznic ocene higieniczna przemyslu przetwórstwa zboza i pracownicy rurociagu transportowego. Koniecznosc korekty RPP ziarna pylu biorac pod uwage jej tresc zawisu i frakcji pozostalosci pestycydów glównie fumigacji. Slowa kluczowe: zboza, transport, odgrzybianie, fosfin, pracownicy, warunki pracy. ???????????????? ??????????? ???????????? ??????? ????? ??????????, ??????????? ? ????????? ?? ???????? ????? ? ??????? ?? ???? ?????? ????????????? ????????? (????????? – ???????? ????????????? – ??????????????? ????????? – ??????????? ?? ????????? ??????????? ????? ? ????? – ???????? ????????? ? ?????? ? ??????? ?????? – ???? ??? ????????? ????? ??????? (???????)). ??? ??????????? ?????????? 755 ???????, ???? ???????? ????, ? ???????? 27-56 ???, ?? ?????? ?????? ? ????????? ?????????? 3-35 ???. ??? ??????????? ???? ????????? ?? 6 ?????: 1.- ??????? ?????????? ? ???????? ??????????; 2. – ????????? ??????????? ?? ??????????? ????? ? ?????; 3. – ????????? ????????????? ???????????; 4. – ???????? ???????? ???????????; 5. – ??????????? ?? ?????????; 6 – ?? ?????????????? ? ????????? ???????, ????????. ???????????? ????????: ???????????????????? ?????? ???????????????? ???????????? ???????? ??????????????? ?????????? ? ?????????????? ???????? ???????, ?????? ??????? ? ??????? ???????? ? ?????? ?????????? ? ?????????? ??????? ????, ???????? ?????????????? ? ????????? ??????? ???????????????? ?? ?????? ??????????? ? ???????????? ????????? ? ????????? ???????? ?? ?????????? ????????????? ???????. ?????????? ???????????? ????????, ??? ????????????? ??????????? ???????????? ???????? ????? ? ??????????? ??????? ???????? ???????????????? ?????. ??????????? ?????? ???? ?????????? ????????? ??????? ? ???????? ????, ???????????? ??? ??????????, ??????????? ??????????????? ????? ? ????? ?? ??????????, ???????? ??????????, ? ????? ??????????? ??????? ? ????? ???????????, ??? ?????????? ???????? ??????????? ?? ???????? ?????????? ? ????????? ??????????????, ??? ?????? ?????? ???? ? ????????? ? ?????????? ??????????????? ????????????? ?????????????? ?????????? ??????????? ?????????????????? ?????????. ???????????? ???????????? ???? ?? ?????????? ? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ?????????? (4 ??/?3) ? 2-6 ???, ? ???????????? ??????? ? ???? ??????? ???????????? ?? ????????? – ?? 15 ???. ?????? ????????????? ??????? ??????????? ?????????? ????? ?? ??????? ? ????????????? ?????. ?? ?????? ???????????? ?????? ???? ?????????? ??????????, ???????? ??????????, ???????????? ?? ????????? ??????? ? ?????? 3.2, ?????????????? ????????????, ????????? ????????????? ??????????? – ? ?????? 3.1, ? ?????????? ??????????? ?? ??????????? ????? ? ????? – ? 3.1-2-?? ??????? ?? ??????????? ????????????? ?????????????. ?????????? ? ??????? ???????? ??????????? ?? ???????????? ??????? ????? ? ?????????? ???????? ?????????? ?????????????????? ?????????. ?????????? ?????????? ???????????? ?? ?????????????? ????????????? ?????? ????? ?????????? ????????????????????? ??????????? ? ????????????? ?????????. ???????? ????????????? ????????? ??? ???????? ???? ? ?????? ?????????? ? ??? ???????? ??????? ? ?????????? ????????? ??????????, ?????? ?????, ??????????. ???????? ?????: ?????, ?????????, ?????????, ??????, ???????, ??????? ?????.