SUMMARY
The Dispute Resolution Council was established as a public institution in the last few decades to reduce the number of cases sent to the judiciary in Iran and strengthen public participation and increase the role of the people in criminal justice policy. Although the activities of this institution in recent years have led to a decrease in the number of cases sent to judicial institutions, but its public aspect was not fulfilled as intended. In addition, the law of this council has many contradictions with the constitution with limitations and problems in the legal and structural field that have affected its functions. However, the role of the people is significant in similar institutions in the legal system of the Common Law and France, while strengthening the participatory aspect. This issue has been an effective measure in strengthening participatory criminal policy in these countries. The purpose of this research was to investigate the criminal policy of the Dispute Resolution Council and similar institutions in France.Keywords: Dispute Resolution Council, French Law, Iranian Criminal Justice Policy Evaluasi Peran dan Kedudukan Dewan Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Kebijakan Pidana Iran Dibandingkan dengan Institusi Serupa di Peradilan Prancis AbstrakDewan Penyelesaian Sengketa didirikan sebagai lembaga publik dalam beberapa dekade terakhir untuk mengurangi jumlah kasus yang dikirim ke peradilan di Iran dan memperkuat partisipasi publik dan meningkatkan peran masyarakat dalam kebijakan peradilan pidana. Meskipun kegiatan lembaga ini dalam beberapa tahun terakhir telah menyebabkan penurunan jumlah kasus yang dikirim ke lembaga peradilan, tetapi aspek publiknya tidak terpenuhi sebagaimana dimaksud. Selain itu, undang-undang dewan ini memiliki banyak kontradiksi dengan konstitusi dengan keterbatasan dan masalah di bidang hukum dan struktural yang mempengaruhi fungsinya. Namun, peran masyarakat cukup signifikan dalam lembaga sejenis dalam sistem hukum Common Law dan Perancis, sekaligus memperkuat aspek partisipatif. Isu ini telah menjadi langkah yang efektif dalam memperkuat kebijakan kriminal partisipatif di negara-negara tersebut. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kebijakan kriminal dari Dispute Resolution Council dan lembaga sejenis di Perancis.Kata Kunci: Dewan Penyelesaian Sengketa, Hukum Prancis, Kebijakan Peradilan Pidana Iran ?????? ???? ? ??????? ??????? ?? ??????? ??????? ???????? ? ????????? ???????? ????? ?? ????????? ? ???????????? ???????????? ?? ??????????? ???????? ??????? ?????????????? ?? ??????? ??????? ???????? ??? ?????? ??? ??????????????? ?????????? ? ????????? ??????????? ??? ?????????? ?????????? ???, ???????????? ? ???????? ?????? ? ?????, ? ?????????? ??????? ?????????????? ? ????????? ???? ?????????????? ? ???????? ?????????? ??????????. ???? ???????????? ????? ?????????? ? ????????? ???? ??????? ? ?????????? ?????????? ???, ???????????? ? ???????? ??????, ???????????? ?????? ?? ??????????? ??????? ???????. ????? ????, ????? ????? ?????? ????? ????? ???????????? ? ???????????? ? ????????????? ? ?????????? ? ???????? ? ??????????? ????????, ??????? ?????? ?? ??? ????????????????. ??? ?? ?????, ???? ?????????? ?????? ??????????? ? ??????????? ??????????? ? ??????? ?????? ????? ? ???????? ??????? ???????, ? ????? ? ???????? ??????? ???????. ???? ?????? ???? ??????????? ????? ? ?????????? ?????????? ????????? ???????? ? ???? ???????. ????? ??????? ???????????? ???????? ??????????? ????????? ???????? ?????? ?? ?????????? ??????? ???????? ? ??????????? ?????????? ?? ???????.???????? ?????: ????? ?? ??????? ??????? ????????, ??????????? ?????, ???????? ? ??????? ?????????? ?????????? ? ?????