A methodological synergy of dramatistic discourse analysis and corpus linguistics: From the discourse of US Presidents to Trump's 2016 Orlando speech
Abstract
The present study offers a novel methodology for corpus-based discourse analysis that combines Kenneth Burke's (1968, 1969) dramatistic method of text analysis and the corpus techniques of keyword extraction and concordance reading. Applying the methodology, a two-stage analysis of Donald Trump's 2016 Orlando speech has been conducted: First, at a micro level, identifying the keywords used by Trump in his speech as compared against the historical reference corpus of US Presidents through WordSmith Tools (Scott, 2012) as well as describing and interpreting Trump's keyword lexical structures in the pentadic ratios rhetorically motivated by the "terministic screens" that select and deflect representations of the gay-nightclub-shooting event in the speech; second, at a macro level, substantiating the whole speech event of Orlando in terms of the different types of substance – geometric, familial, and directional – recognized in the keywords clustering and linking in the speech. The study has reached two findings. First, methodologically, synergizing Burke's dramatistic method of text analysis and corpus-linguistics techniques in a novel way that contributes to analysing the rhetorical language of political discourse, yielding a corpus-based dramatistic discourse analysis. Second, practically, analysing the pentadic ratios of the speech keywords and their substance types has revealed Trump's rhetoric of selecting and deflecting certain representations of the Orlando political event through a number of terministic screens and substantiations.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, Floyd D., & Prelli, Lawrence J. (2001). Pentadic cartography: Mapping the universe of discourse. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 87(1), 73-95.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630109384319
Appel, Edward C. (1993). Implications and importance of the negative in Burke's dramatistic philosophy of language. Communication Quarterly, 41(1), 51-65.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379309369867
Appel, Edward C. (1997). The rhetoric of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.: Comedy and context in tragic collision. Western Journal of Communication, 61(4), 376-402.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319709374586
Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London/New York: Continuum.
Baker, P. (2010). Sociolinguistics and corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Birdsell, David S. (1987). Ronald Reagan on Lebanon and Grenada: Flexibility and interpretation in the application of Kenneth Burke's Pentad. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 73(3), 267-279.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638709383808
Blain, M. (2005). The politics of victimage: Power and subjection in a U.S. anti-gay campaign. Critical Discourse Studies, 2(1), 31-50.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900500052168
Bloomfield, E. F., & Tscholl, G. (2018). Analyzing Warrants and Worldviews in the Rhetoric of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton: Burke and Argumentation in the 2016 Presidential Election. The Journal of the Kenneth Burke Society, 13(2), 1-12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psq.12490
Brummett, B. (1979). A pentadic analysis of ideologies in two gay rights controversies. Central States Speech Journal, 30(3), 250-261.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10510977909368018
Brummett, B. (1980). Symbolic form, Burkean scapegoating, and rhetorical exigency in Alioto's response to the "Zebra" Murders'. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 44(1), 64-73.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318009373987
Burke, K. (1931/1968a). Counter-Statement. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Burke, K. (1935/1965). Permanence and change. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Burke, K. (1941/1973). The philosophy of literary form. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Burke, K. (1945/1969). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Burke, K. (1961/1970). The rhetoric of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Burke, K. (1966). Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Burke, K. (1968b). Dramatism. In David L. Sills (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of the social sciences Vol. 7 (pp. 445-452). New York: Macmillan.
Burke, K. (1972). Dramatism and development. Worcester. MA: Clark University Press.
Condit, Celester M., & Selzer, J. A. (1985). The rhetoric of objectivity in the newspaper coverage of a murder trial. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 2(3), 197-216.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038509360081
Cooks, L., & Descutner, D. (1993). Different paths from powerlessness to empowerment: A dramatistic analysis of two eating disorder therapies. Western Journal of Communication, 57(4), 494-514.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319309374470
Ebigbagha, Sylvester Z. (2020). The Burke’s pentad heuristic potentiality for creative idea generation in graphic communication design. Review of Artistic Education, 20(1), 228-242.
https://doi.org/10.2478/rae-2020-0028
Edgar, Amanda N. (2014). R&B rhetoric and victim-blaming discourses: exploring the popular press's revision of Rihanna's contextual agency. Women's Studies in Communication, 37(2), 138-158.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2014.909374
Fairclough, No. (1990). What might we mean by "enterprise discourse"? In R. Keat, & N. Abercrombie (Eds.), Enterprise culture (pp. 38-57). London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity.
Hahn, Dan F., & Morland, A. (1979). A Burkean analysis of Lincoln's second inaugural address. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 9(4), 376-389.
Head, Samuel L. (2016). Teaching grounded audiences: Burke's identification in Facebook and composition. Computers and Composition, 39, 27-40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.11.006
Hoey, M. 1991. Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jensen, K. (2018). Rhetorical counteraction in Kenneth Burke's A Rhetoric of Motives and The War of Words. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 104(4), 384-399.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2018.1519254
Jensen, K., & Ratcliffe, K. (2017). Mythic historiography: Refiguring Kenneth Burke's deceitful woman trope. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 48(1), 88-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2017.1278780
Kennedy, G. (1998). An introduction to corpus linguistics. London/New York: Longman.
Kenny, Robert W. (2005). A cycle of terms implicit in the idea of medicine: Karen Ann Quinlan as rhetorical icon and the transvaluation of the ethics of euthanasia. Health Communication, 17(1), 17-39.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1701_2
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
Ling, David A. (1970). A pentadic analysis of senator Edward Kennedy's address to the people of Massachusetts, July 25, 1969. Central States Speech Journal, 21(2), 81-86.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10510977009363002
Lule, J. (1990). The political use of victims: The shaping of the challenger disaster. Political Communication and Persuasion, 7(2), 115-128.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1990.9962891
Mahlberg, M. (2007). Lexical items in discourse: Identifying local textual functions of sustainable development. In M. Hoey, M. Mahlberg, M. Stubbs, & W. Teubert (Eds.), Text, discourse and corpora: Theory and analysis (pp. 191-218). London: Continuum.
Pearson, J. (1998). Terms in context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Phillips, M. (1983). Lexical macrostructure in science text (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Prelli, Lawrence J., & Winters, Terri S. (2009). Rhetorical features of green evangelicalism. Environmental Communication, 3(2), 224-243.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030902928785
Rosenfield, Lawrence W. (1976). August 9, 1974: The victimage of Richard Nixon. Communication Quarterly, 24(4), 19-23.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01463377609369233
Scott, M. (2004). WordSmith Tools. Version 4.0. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]
Scott, M. (2012). WordSmith Tools. Version 6.0. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scott, M., & Tribble, C. (2006). Textual patterns: Key words and corpus analysis in language education. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Simons, Herbert W. (2004). The rhetorical legacy of Kenneth Burke. In W. Jost, & W. Olmsted (Eds.), A companion to rhetoric and rhetorical criticism (pp. 152-167). Oxford: Blackwell.
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sinclair, J. (2003). Reading concordances: An introduction. London: Pearson.
Stillar, G. (1998). Analyzing everyday texts: Discourse, rhetoric, and social perspectives. London: Sage.
Stob, P. (2008). "Terministic screens," social constructionism, and the language of experience: Kenneth Burke's utilization of William James. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 41(2), 130-152.
https://doi.org/10.1353/par.0.0001
Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and corpus analysis: Computer-assisted studies of language and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tribble, C. (2002). Corpora and corpus analysis: New windows on academic writing. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 131-49). Harlow: Longman.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies