ASEAN Non-Intervention Principles: An Alternative Settlement towards Human Rights Violation in Rohingya

Yulianto Achmad; Nanik Prasetyoningsih; M. Reformis Al Fath

doi:10.18196/jmh.v28i1.10892

ASEAN Non-Intervention Principles: An Alternative Settlement towards Human Rights Violation in Rohingya

Yulianto Achmad, Nanik Prasetyoningsih, M. Reformis Al Fath

Abstract

The frame of international news is colored with a series of systemic and consistent human rights violation experienced by the Rohingya ethnic group in Burma. Toward this case, it is unlikely for Burma to be willing and to be able to resolve this case internally. Hence, as a regional security and stability guard in the Southeast Asia region, ASEAN should take part in settling human rights violations that occur in its member states. However, every settlement attempted by ASEAN is constantly distracted with Non-Intervention Principles. This research aims to examine the alternative ideas for Non-Intervention Principles of ASEAN as a settlement towards human rights violation on Rohingya ethnic. This research used normative research, based on the secondary data was employed as the research method. The obtained data were analyzed by using qualitative analysis. The research found that the Non-Intervention principle has been applied in ASEAN in the most rigid form. Meanwhile, Humanitarian Assistance and Humanitarian Intervention mechanism is an alternative settlement towards human rights violations on the Rohingya ethnic group in Myanmar

Keywords

human rights violations; Non-Intervention Principle; Rohingya ethnic

Full Text:

PDF

References

Books

Adolf, H. (1996). Aspek-Aspek Negara dalam Hukum Internasional. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Burmansyah, E. (2014). Rezim Baru ASEAN: Memahami Rantai Pasokan dan Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Sempu.

Ibnu Taimiyah, Al-Siyasah al-Syari’ah

Irawan, J. (2018). Pelaksanaan Yurisdiksi Universal. Yogyakarta: Rajawali Press.

Islami, M.N. (2017). Hukum Internasional dalam Perspektif Islam dan Kedaulatan Bangsa. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Konde, V. (2010). A Handbook of International Human Right Terminology. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.

Kusumaatmadja, M & Agoes, E.R. (2003). Pengantar Hukum Internasional, Bandung: Penerbit Alumni.

Mauna, B. (2005). Hukum Internasional: Pengertian, Peranan dan Fungsi dalam Era Dinamika Global. Bandung: Alumni.

Saifullah. (2010). Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Islam di Asia Tenggara. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar.

Weatherbee, D.E. (2009). International Relation in Southeast Asia: The Struggle for Autonomy. USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group.

Journals

Afriani, A. (2016). Isu Bencana dan Prinsip-Prinsip Humanitarian dalam Studi Ilmu Hubungan Internasional. Andalas Journal of International Studies. 5(1).

Amasti, A.Y.N. (2016). Kelemahan Respon Asean Intergovernmental Comission on Human Rights (AICHR) terhadap Kasus Tentara Anak di Myanmar 2010-2015. Journal of International Relations, 2(3).

Djauhari. (2005). Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Perspektif Islam. Jurnal Hukum, 15(2).

Drews, M. (2008). The Four Models Mediation. DIAC Journal, 3(1).

Dussich, J.P.J. (2018). The Ongoing Genocidal Crisis of the Rohingya Minority in Myanmar. Journal of Victimology and Victim Justice, 1(1).

Eliza, E. et al. (2014). Intervensi Kemanusiaan (Humanitarian Intervention) menurut Hukum Internasional dan Implementasinya dalam Konflik Bersenjata. Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(4).

Fitria. (2012). Implementasi Doktrin Responsibility to Protect (Humanitarian Intervention) dalam Hukum Internasional (Kasus Kosovo Libya Dan Suriah). Lex Jurnalica. 9(1).

Gunawan, Y. & Priambodo, G. (2013). Burma’s Rohingya Case in International Law Perspective. Jurnal Media Hukum, 20(1).

Gunawan, Y., Ritonga, P.Y., Amelia, M., Harun, S.S.K., & Ramadani, N.N. (2020). Does the Protection of Minority Groups in Xinjiang Fail? Sriwijaya Law Review, 4(2).

Humaniter dan Pertanggungjawaban berdasarkan Statuta Roma (ICC). JOM Fakultas Hukum UNRI, 3(2).

Jati, I. (2017). Comparative Study of the Roles of ASEAN and the Organization of Islamic Cociteration in Responding to the Rohingya Crisis, The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 1(1).

Kurniawan, N. (2017). Kasus Rohingya dan Tanggung Jawab Negara dalam Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Konstitusi. 14(4).

Linjun, W.U. (2000). East Asia and the Principle of Non-Intervention: Policies and Practices. Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies, 5(160).

Mohajan, H. (2018). History of Rakhine State and the Origin of the Rohingya Muslims. The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 2(1).

Mohajan, H. (2018). The Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar are Victim of Genocide. ABC Journal of Advanced Research, 7(1).

Rachminawati & Mokhtar, K.A. (2019). Protection of Human Rights in Southeast Asia with Special Reference to the Rohingya in Myanmar: A Critical Study of the Effect of ASEAN’s Policy and Action on ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR). Padjadjaran Journal of International Law, 3(1).

Rahmanto, T.Y. (2017). Prinsip Non-Intervensi bagi Asean ditinjau dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal HAM, 8(2).

Rattan, J. (2019). Changing Dimensions of Intervention Under International Law: A Critical Analysis. Sage Journal. 9(2)

Rum, M. (2020). The State of Responsibility to Protect Inception in ASEAN Regionalism. The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 3(1).

Saputra, O.D. (2019). Peran Asean Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights Sebagai Institusi HAM Asean: Kasus Rohingya di Myanmar 2012-2016. Journal of International Relations, 5(1).

Thamrin, H. (2018). Rohingya-Myanmar Crisis: How Is ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights?. International Affairs and Global Strategy, 63(1).

Wahyuni. (2016). Kejahatan Genosida terhadap Etnis Rohingnya dalam Perspektif

Thesis

Amora, M. (2010). Arti Strategis Piagam Asean (Asean Charter) terhadap Kerjasama Regional Asean. (Tesis). Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia.

Dissertation

Gamez, K.R. (2017). Examining the Asean Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR): The Case Study of the Rohingya Crisis. (Dissertation). Tilburg University. The Netherlands.

Internet Articles

Human Rights Council. (2018). Report of the Detailed Findings of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar. [Accessed on January 29, 2020]. Available at, https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/FFMMyanmar/A_HRC_39_CRP.2.pdf

Human Rights Council. (2018). Report of the independent international fact-finding mission on Myanmar. [Accessed on January 30, 2020]. Available at, https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/FFMMyanmar/A_HRC_39_64.pdf

Journeyman. (2013). The Buddhist Massacring Muslims in Burma. [Accessed on February 1, 2020]. Available at, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRzoYdLc_4&t=625s

Khoir. (2012). Pelepasan Tim Kemanusiaan Dompet Dhuafa ke Rohingya. [Accessed on February 10, 2020]. Available at, http://dompetdhuafa.org/id/berita/detail/pelepasan-tim-kemanusiaandompet-dhuafa-ke-rohingya

OHCHR. (2020). UN Treaty Body Database. [Accessed on January 5, 2020]. Available at, https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/

Salim, T. (2016). No ASEAN Meeting to Discuss Rohingya. [Accessed on March 27, 2021]. Available at, https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2016/11/26/noasean-meeting-to-discuss-rohingya.html

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v28i1.10892