Transnational Networks of Pork Production: Fragile Linkages between Germany and CEE Countries

Authors

  • Oliver Klein Institute for Geography and Geology, University of Greifswald, Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Straße 17a, 17487 Greifswald, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.25.1.06

Keywords:

global production networks, agri-food geographies, pork industry, internationalization, exports, foreign direct investments, economic policy, Germany, Central and Eastern Europe (CEE)

Abstract

The intention of this paper is to explore the internationalization efforts of German pork producers towards Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) with a special focus on recent dynamics, market development strategies and policy conditions. The added-value potentials offered by CEE countries have become increasingly lucrative for the German pork industry, particularly as the domestic market currently shows a certain degree of saturation in terms of consumption. The results of this study which is mainly based on qualitative interviews with selected pork producers from North-West Germany reveal that transnational pork production networks between Germany and CEE are shaped by a high degree of fragility and discontinuity. This is reflected not only by the fluctuating development of foreign trade in piglets, live hogs and pork products, but also by the uncertainty and hesitancy of the interviewed pork producers with regard to business operations in CEE markets. It will be shown that the policy conditions on the national level still have a clear impact on internationalization processes in the pork industry. The paper further illustrates that the configuration of transnational pork production networks can be explained, in part, by insights from the global production networks (GPN) and the agri-food geographies literature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

About the company (2016), http://www.zmnove.pl/page/22/Who-we-are (22.12.2016).
Google Scholar

AHDB (2016), Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, EU pig meat self-sufficiency, http://pork.ahdb.org.uk/prices-stats/consumption/eu-self-sufficiency/ (15.12.2016).
Google Scholar

AMI, Agricultural Market Information Company (various years), Market balance sheet livestock and meat, Bonn: published by author’s edition.
Google Scholar

Annual Report (2013), Annual Report 2013, http://westfleisch.de/fileadmin/Bilder/02_Unternehmen/02.07_Archiv/02.07.01_Geschaeftsberichte/2013/Westfleisch_eG_GB_2013.pdf (22.12.2016).
Google Scholar

ATKINS, P. J. and BOWLER, I. R. (2001), Food in society. Economy, culture, geography, London: Arnold.
Google Scholar

BARTOSIŃSKA, M., WYKOWSKI, G. and NALEWAJK, T. (2014), Ocena skutków regulacji – branża mięsna, Warszawa: Departament Bezpieczeństwa Żywności i Weterynarii, Ministerstwo Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi.
Google Scholar

BUTTEL, F. H. (2001), ‘Some reflections on late twentieth century agrarian political economy’, Sociologia Ruralis, 41 (2), pp. 165–181.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00176

CHALLIES, E. and MURRAY, W. E. (2011), ‘The interaction of global value chains and rural livelihoods: the case of smallholder raspberry growers in Chile’, Journal of Agrarian Change, 11 (1), pp. 29–59.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00282.x

COE, N. and HESS, M. (2011), ‘Local and regional development: a global production networks approach’, [in:] PIKE, A., RODRIGUEZ-POSE, A. and TOMANEY, J. (eds.), Handbook of local and regional development, London: Routledge, pp. 128–138.
Google Scholar

COE, N. and YEUNG, H.W.-C. (2015), Global production networks. Theorizing economic development in an interconnected world, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703907.001.0001

CZABAN, L. and HENDERSON, J. (2003), ‘Commodity chains, foreign investment and labour issues in Eastern Europe’, Global Networks, 3 (2), pp. 171–196.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0374.00055

DANISH AGRICULTURE AND FOOD COUNCIL (2017), Market news for pig meat, 15th May 2017, http://www.agricultureandfood.co.uk/knowledge-bank/market-reports/15-may-2017 (27.06.2017).
Google Scholar

DANNENBERG, P. and KÜMMERLE, T. (2010), ‘Farm size and land use pattern as indicators of post-socialist structural change in Poland’, The Professional Geographer, 62 (2), pp. 197–210.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00330120903546312

DANNENBERG, P. and. NDURU, G. (2013), ‘Practices in international value chains: the case of the Kenyan fruit and vegetable chain beyond the exclusion debate’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 104 (1), pp. 41–56.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2012.00719.x

DEIMEL, M., ARENS, L. and THEUVSEN, L. (2011), ‘The influence of clusters on the competitiveness of hog production: the example of North-Western Germany’, International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 2 (2), pp. 155–166.
Google Scholar

DOLAN, C. and HUMPHREY, J. (2004), ‘Changing governance patterns in the trade in fresh vegetables between Africa and the United Kingdom’, Environment and Planning A, 36 (3), pp. 491–509.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a35281

FOLD, N. and GOUGH, K. V. (2008), ‘From smallholders to transnationals: the impact of changing consumer preferences in the EU on Ghana’s pineapple sector’, Geoforum, 39 (5), pp. 1687–1697.
Google Scholar

FRIEDMANN, H. (1982), ‘The political economy of food: the rise and fall of the postwar international food order’, American Journal of Sociology, 88, pp. 248–286.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/649258

FRIEDMANN, H. (2000), ‘What on earth is the modern world-system? Food getting and territory in the modern era and beyond’, Journal of World-Systems Research, 11 (2), pp. 480–515.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2000.214

GIBBON, P., PONTE, S. and LAZARO, E. (eds.) (2010), Global agro-food trade and standards: challenges for Africa, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230281356

GOODMAN, D. (1999), ‘Agro-food studies in the “age of ecology”: nature, corporeality, bio-politics’, Sociologia Ruralis, 39 (1), pp. 17–38.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00091

GOODMAN, D. (2001), ‘Ontology matters: the relational materiality of nature and agro-food studies’, Sociologia Ruralis, 41 (2), pp. 182–200.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00177

GOODMAN, D. (2003), ‘The brave new worlds of agricultural technoscience’, [in:] SCHURMAN, R. A. and KELSO, D. T. (eds.), Engineering trouble: biotechnology and its discontents, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 218–238.
Google Scholar

GOODMAN, M. K. (2016), ‘Food geographies I: Relational foodscapes and the busy-ness of being more-than-food’, Progress in Human Geography, 40 (2), pp. 257–266.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515570192

GRANOVETTER, M. (1985), ‘Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3), pp. 481–510.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/228311

HENDERSON, J., DICKEN, P., HESS, M., COE, N. and YEUNG, H.W.-C. (2002), ‘Global production networks and the analysis of economic development’, Review of International Political Economy, 9 (3), pp. 436–464.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290210150842

HUDSON, R. (2008), ‘Cultural political economy meets global production networks: a productivemeeting?’, Journal of Economic Geography, 8 (3), pp. 421–440.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbn005

HUMPHREY, J. and MEMEDOVIC, O. (2006), Global value chains in the agri-food sector, Vienna: UNIDO Working Papers.
Google Scholar

ISN (2016), Interessengemeinschaft der Scheinehalter Deutschlands, ISN-Schlachthofranking 2015, http://www.schweine.net/news/isn-schlachthofranking-2015-preiskrise-wettbewerb.html (6.10.2016).
Google Scholar

LEL and LFL (2016), Landesanstalt für Entwicklung der Landwirtschaft und der Ländlichen Räume and Bayrische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft, Agrarmärkte. Jahresheft 2016, Freising-Weihenstephan: Schriftenreihe der Bayrischen Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft.
Google Scholar

LE HERON, R. (2002), ‘Globalisation, food regimes and “rural” networks’, [in:] BOWLER, I. R., BRYANT, C. R. and COCKLIN, C. (eds.), The sustainability of rural systems: geographical interpretations, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 81–96.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3471-4_5

LERMAN, Z., CSAKI, C. and FEDER, G. (2004), ‘Evolving farm structures and land-use patterns in former socialist countries’, Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 43 (4), pp. 309–335.
Google Scholar

LEVY, D. L. (2008), ‘Political contestation in global production networks’, Academy of Management Review, 33 (4), pp. 943–963.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.34422006

LOCKIE, S. and KITTO, S. (2000), ‘Beyond the farm gate: production-consumption networks and agri-food research’, Sociologia Ruralis, 40 (1), pp. 3–19.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00128

MAYRING, P. (2014), Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution, http://www.psychopen.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/books/mayring/ssoar-2014-mayring-Qualitative_content_analysis_theoretical_foun-dation.pdf (20.5.2016).
Google Scholar

MAYRING, P. (2016), Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung: eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken, 6th edition, Weinheim: Beltz.
Google Scholar

MEUSER, M. and NAGEL, U. (2009), ‘Das Experteninterview – konzeptionelle Grundlagen und methodische Anlage’, [in:] PICKEL, S., PICKEL, G., LAUTH, H.-J. and JAHN, D. (eds.), Methoden der vergleichenden Politik- und Sozialwissenschaft: Neue Entwicklungen und Anwendungen, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 465‒479.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91826-6_23

MICEK, G., NEO, H. and GÓRECKI, J. (2011), ‘Foreign direct investment, institutional context and the changing Polish pig industry’, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 93 (1), pp. 41–55.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2011.00360.x

MORGAN, K., MARSDEN, T. and MURDOCH, J. (2006), Worlds of Food. Place, power, and provenance in the Food Chain, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

MURDOCH, J. and MIELE, M. (1999), ‘“Back to nature”: changing “worlds of production” in the food sector’, Sociologia Ruralis, 39 (4), pp. 465–483.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00119

MÜLLER, D., KÜMMERLE, T., RUSU, M. and GRIFFITH, P. (2009), ‘Lost in transition: determinants of cropland abandonment in postsocialist Romania’, Journal of Land Use Science, 4 (1–2), pp. 109–129.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17474230802645881

NILES, D. and ROFF, R. J. (2008), ‘Shifting agri-food systems: the contemporary geography of food and agriculture; an introduction’, GeoJournal, 73 (1), pp. 1–10.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-008-9174-4

PAWLONKA, T. (2017), ‘The specificity of meat processing sector in the European Union – condition and perspectives’, Problems of Agricultural Economics, 350 (1), pp. 179–197.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/00441600.1233010

PIKE, A., LAGENDIJK, A. and VALE, M. (2000), ‘Critical reflections on “embeddedness” in economic geography: the case of labour market governance in the automotive industry in the North East region of England’, [in:] GIUNTA, A., LAGENDIJK, A. and PIKE, A. (eds.), Restructuring industry and territory: the experience of Europe’s regions, London: The Stationery Office, pp. 59–82.
Google Scholar

SCHNELL, R., HILL, P. B. and ESSER, E. (2013), Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, 10th edition, München, Oldenbourg Verlag.
Google Scholar

STAROSTA, G. (2010), ‘Global commodity chains and the Marxian law of value’, Antipode, 4 2(2), pp. 433–465.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00753.x

SUNLEY, P. (2008), ‘Relational economic geography: a partial understanding or a new paradigm?’, Economic Geography, 84 (1), pp. 1–26.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.tb00389.x

THOMSEN, L. (2016), ‘Exporting to Russia? Entry barriers for food suppliers in a territory in transition’, Journal of Economic Geography, 16 (4), pp. 831–847.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbv016

USDA (2016a), U.S. Department of Agriculture, GAIN report: Poland. Livestock and products report, https://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Livestock%20and%20Products%20Report_Warsaw_Poland_11-17-2016.pdf (12.06.2017).
Google Scholar

USDA (2016b), U.S. Department of Agriculture, GAIN report: Romania livestock annual report 2016, https://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Romania%20Livestock%20Annual%20Report%202016_Bucharest_Romania_11-17-2016.pdf (12.06.2017).
Google Scholar

USDA (2017), U.S. Department of Agriculture, GAIN report: Russian Federation. Livestock and products semi-annual, https://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Livestock%20and%20Products%20Semi-annual_Mos-cow_Russian%20Federation_3-3-2016.pdf (12.06.2017).
Google Scholar

WHATMORE, S. J. and THORNE, L. B. (1997), ‘Nourishing networks: alternative geographies of food’, [in:] GOODMAN, D. and WATTS, M. (eds.), Globalising food. Agrarian questions and global restructuring, London: Routledge, pp. 287–304.
Google Scholar

WOGNUM, N., TRIENEKENS, J., WEVER, M., VLAJIC, J., VAN DER VORST, J. G. A. J., OMTA, O., HERMANSEN, J. and NGUYEN, T. L. T. (2009), ‘Organisation, logistics and environmental issues in the European pork chain’s, [in:] TREINEKENS, J., PETERSEN, N., WOGNUM, D. and BRINKMANN, T. (eds.), European pork chains. Diversity and quality challenges in consumer-oriented production and distribution, Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers, pp. 41–72.
Google Scholar

YEUNG, H. W.-C. and COE, N. (2015), ‘T’oward a dynamic theory of global production networks’, Economic Geography, 91 (1), pp. 29–58.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2018-08-14

How to Cite

Klein, O. (2018). Transnational Networks of Pork Production: Fragile Linkages between Germany and CEE Countries. European Spatial Research and Policy, 25(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.25.1.06

Issue

Section

Articles