PUBLIC PERCEPTION REGARDING MONEY POLITICS IN GENERAL ELECTION 2019 (COMPARTIVE STUDY ON TEGAL CITY AND TEGAL REGENCY)

Sri Sutjiatmi, Dwian Hartomi Akta Padma Eldo, Arif Zainudin

Abstract


This paper is intended to look at the condition of Indonesia related to the still rampant occurrence of money politics which is a problem in the community when the 2019 elections simultaneously. This research takes a case study between Tegal City and Tegal Regency. The interesting thing in this study is to see how the community's assessment of the Tegal city and Tegal Regency groups regarding money politics in the 2019 elections simultaneously. The method used is a mixed method (between Mixed Methods) between quantitative and qualitative, by calculating the Solvin formula by deepening the analysis by interviewing the speakers directly. The results of the study showed that the people of Tegal City had a relatively high attitude of not paying attention to the Politics of Money in the General Election relating to the political money of the General Elections in 2019 at the same time. Unlike the people of Tegal Regency who consider money politics as a culture that is difficult to remove. Also interesting is the beginner voter group Tegal Regency has a fairly high knowledge about money politics that can damage the democratic system compared to the Beginner voters in Tegal City.

Keywords


Comparison of Perception; Money Politics; Elections

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amanu, M. (2015). Politik Uang dalam Pemilihan Kepala Desa ( Studi Kasus di Desa Jatirejo Kecamatan Banyakan Kabupaten Kediri) Mohamad Amanu 105120101111019.

Arrsa, R. C. (2014). Pemilu Serentak dan Masa Depan Konsolidasi Demokrasi. (169).

Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research design: pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Dewi, S. (2015). SIKAP DAN PEMAKNAAN PEREMPUAN MARGINAL TERHADAP POLITIK UANG: Studi Kasus Pemilu Tahun 2014 di Kabupaten Kudus. Addin, 9(1), 205–228.

Jamaludin, A. N. (2017). Sosiologi perkotaan (Memahami masyarakat Kota dan Problematikanya) (ke-2). Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Kumorotomo, W. (2009). Intervensi Parpol, Politik Uang dan Korupsi: Tantangan kebijakan Publik Setelah Pilkada Berlangsung. Konferensi Administrasi Negara, (32), 1–18.

Lukmajati, D. (2016). Praktek Politik Uang dalam Pemilu Legislatif 2014 (Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Blora). 7(1), 1–24.

Muhtadi, B. (2013). Politik Uang Dan Dinamika Elektoral Di Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian Awal Interaksi Antara Party-Id Dan Patron-Klien. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 10(1), 369. Retrieved from http://ejournal.politik.lipi.go.id/index.php/jpp/article/view/217

Nurtjahyo, H. (2006). Filsafat Demokrasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Qodir, Z. (2014). Politik Uang Dalam Pemilu-Pemilukada 2014: Modus dan Resolusinya. Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Daerah, 8(2), 39–54.

Sihidi, I. T., Khanifah, L. N., Romadhan, A. A., Pemerintahan, D. I., Malang, U. M., & Malang, K. (2019). RELASI POLITIK UANG DAN PARTY-ID DI INDONESIA. (2), 204–220.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Zen, H. (2015). Politik Uang Dalam Pandangan Hukum Positif Dan Syariah. Al-´Adalah, 12(3), 525–540.



Digital Object Identifier

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v6i1.26632


Dimension Citation Metrics Badge

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 CosmoGov: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Cosmogov: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.