Topos of Donbas as a Narrative Phenomenon in the Ukrainian Culture of the XX–XXI Centuries: Observations, Analysis, Summarizing

Authors

  • Olena Romanenko Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2018.98.081

Keywords:

Donbas, topos, metaphor, places of memory, locus, image

Abstract

In this article the course of Donbas representation in the Ukrainian literature and culture of the 20–21th is described. Artworks of that times have been analyzed here in context of geographical metaphors forming and presentativeimpressions about Donbas as a whole socio-cultural area. Three types of Donbas's perception in Ukrainian literature have been identified. The first one is based on metaphorical comprehension of vision of steppe and hard work. This type was formed in Ukrainian literature in the first decades of XX century. For example, in the works of Spyrydon Cherkasenko or Mykola Cherniavsky. The second one is based on the idea of heroic labor and industrialization. Its formation dates back to the 1920s and 1930s. This was especially shown in the artistic and journalistic works that were published on the pages of magazines “New Generation”, “Zaboy”. And in the 1970s it came out in Peter Shelest’s and Oleksiy Tykhogo’s publications. The third type of the Donbas perception appeared as a result of social changes at the end of the XX century. Its main component is the motive of existential emptiness. In the article, this is described on the example of the analysis of Serhiy Zhadan’s works and in the public speeches of Yaroslav Hrytsak and Olena Styazhkina. Aspects of topic exploring in the context of memory investigation in modern humanities have been outlined in the article.

Author Biography

Olena Romanenko, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Institute of Philology Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Tarasa Shevchenka Boulevard, 14, 01601, Kyiv, Ukraine

References

Abybok Yu. Paradoksy natsionalnoi identychnosti. Yaroslav Hrytsak: Natsiia stvoriuietsia z dosvidu spivisnuvannia [Paradoxes of National Identity. YaroslavHrytsak: A Nation is Createdfrom the Experience of Coexistence]. Den, 2007, 18 October, no. 178. (in Ukrainian).

Assmann A. Prostory spohadu. Formy ta transformatsii kulturnoi pamiati [Spaces of Memory. Forms and Transformations of Cultural Memory]. Kyiv, 2012, 437 p. (in Ukrainian).

Ver V. Donbasy [Donbases]. Nova heneratsiia, 1929, no. 6, pp. 21–23. (in Ukrainian).

Vertov Dz. Stat'i. Dnevniki. Zamysly [Articles. Diaries. Designs]. Moscow, 1966, 320 p. (in Russian).

Judt T. Pohranychnyi narod [Edge People]. Krytyka, 2010, no. 9–10, pp. 44–45. (in Ukrainian).

Domanska E. Istoriia ta suchasna humanitarystyka: doslidzhennia z teorii znannia pro mynule [History and the Contemporary Humanities: Studies in Theory of Historical Knowledge]. Kyiv, 2012, 263 p. (in Ukrainian).

Zhadan S. Hospod′ sympatyzuie autsaideram [The Lord is Sympathetic to Outsiders]. Kharkiv, 2015, 507 p. (in Ukrainian).

Zhadan S. Zhyttia Marii [Mary's Life]. Chernivtsi, 2015, 183 p. (in Ukrainian).

Zhadan S. Internat [Boarding School].Chernivtsi, 2017, 334 p. (in Ukrainian).

Zhadan S. Tampliiery: novi virshi, 2015–2016 [Templars: New Verses, 2015–2016]. Chernivtsi, 2017, 117 p. (in Ukrainian).

Levchenko I. Metafory Donbasu: iak pysalasia istoriia rehionu v literaturi [Metaphors of the Donbas: How the History of the Region was Written in Literature]. Available at: http://archive.chytomo.com/news/metafori-donbasu-yak-pisalasya-istoriya-regionu-v-literaturi (accessed 14 March 2016). (in Ukrainian).

Malovichko I. Donbas [Donbas]. Nova heneratsiia, 1929, no. 5, pp. 4–5. (in Ukrainian).

Nora P. Teperishnie, natsiia, pamiat [Present, Nation, Memory]. Kyiv, 2014, 265 p. (in Ukrainian).

Poltoratskyi O., Sotnyk D. Donbas na pivdorozi [Donbas is Halfway]. Nova heneratsiia, 1929, no. 6, pp. 7–21. (in Ukrainian).

Biliavskyi V., Hryhoriv M. (Comps.). Poroda: antolohiia ukrainskykh pysmennykiv Donbasu [Rock: Anthology of Ukrainian Writers of the Donbas]. Kyiv, 2017, 384 p. (in Ukrainian).

Potapchyk N. Pryzov robitnykiv-udarnykiv do literatury – ne kampaniia, a systema roboty [The Call of the Shock Worker for Literature is not a Campaign but a System of Work]. Zaboi, 1931, no. 2, p. 2. (in Ukrainian).

Prokofiev M. Nasha nastanova [Our Guideline]. Zaboi, 1931, no. 1, pp. 2–3. (in Ukrainian).

Prosalova V. Ukrainska diaspora: literaturni postati, tvory, biobibliohrafichni vidomosti [Ukrainian Diaspora: Literary Figures, Works, Biobibliographic Information]. Donetsk, 2012, 516 p. (in Ukrainian).

Rafieienko V. Dovhi chasy: miska balada [Long Times: City Ballad]. Lviv, 2017, 264 p. (in Ukrainian).

Romanenko O. Metafory Donbasu v literaturnii ta istorychnii naratsii: dosvid mizhdystsyplinarnykh doslidzhen [Metaphors of the Donbas in the Literary and Historical Narrative: the Experience of Multidisciplinary Research]. In: Suchasna filolohichna nauka v mizhdystsyplinarnomu konteksti [Contemporary Philological Science in a Multidisciplinary Context]. Program International Conference, Kyiv, 2015, p. 4. (in Ukrainian).

Rüsen J. Novi shliakhy istorychnoho myslennia [New Ways of historical thinking]. Lviv, 2010, 358 p. (in Ukrainian).

Stvorimo masovu pisniu pro shakhtiara-udarnyka [Let's Create a Massive Song about a Miner-Shock Worker]. Zaboi, 1931, no. 9–10, p. 1. (in Ukrainian).

Stiazhkina E. Donbass ne vernetsia v Ukrainu, potomu chto Donbassa ne sushchestvuet [Donbass will not Returnto Ukraine, Because Donbass Does Not Exist]. Available at: https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/columns/2014/11/3/7043067/ (accessed 3 November 2014). (in Russian).

Tykhyi O. Dumky pro ridnyi Donetskyi krai [Thoughts about My Native Donetsk Region]. Donbas, 1991, no. 1, pp. 141–158. (in Ukrainian).

Topolski J. Iak my pyshemo i rozumiiemo istoriiu. Taiemnytsi istorychnoï naratsiï [How We Write and Understand History. The Mysteries of the Historical Narrative]. Kyiv, 2012, 399 p. (in Ukrainian).

Cherkasenko S. Vybrani tvory [Selected Works]. Kyiv, 1991, vol. 1, 671 p. (in Ukrainian).

Cherkasenko S. Na shakhti: maliunok z shakhtarskoho zhyttia [In the Mine: a Sketch of Miner's Life]. Kyiv, 1907, 48 p. (inUkrainian).

Cherkasenko S. U shakhtariv: iak zhyvut i pratsiuiut na shakhtakh [With Miners: How They Live and Work in Mines]. Kyiv, 1919, 84 p. (inUkrainian).

Cherniavskyi M. Zaboishchyk. Piramida [Coal-Miner. Pyramid]. Zoria, 1927, no. 1, p. 2. (in Ukrainian).

Shelest P. Ukraino nasha radianska [Our Soviet Ukraine]. Kyiv, 1970, 292 p. (in Ukrainian).

Yakymchuk L. Abrykosy Donbasu [Apricots of Donbass]. Lviv, 2015, 192p. (in Ukrainian).

Auge M. Non-Place: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. London, 1995, 124 p.

White H. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore, 2014, 448 p.

Published

2018-12-28

How to Cite

Romanenko, O. “Topos of Donbas As a Narrative Phenomenon in the Ukrainian Culture of the XX–XXI Centuries: Observations, Analysis, Summarizing”. Pitannâ lìteraturoznavstva, no. 98, Dec. 2018, pp. 81-104, doi:10.31861/pytlit2018.98.081.

Issue

Section

Poetics