LEGAL PROTECTION OF NIKE TRADEMARK HOLDERS (STUDY IN KLITHIKAN MARKET OF YOGYAKARTA)

Doni Prasetio, Ani Yunita

Abstract


Legal protection for Nike trademark holders in the Klithikan Pakuncen market in Yogyakarta is still not effective because there is no special regulation to protect Nike trademark holders. Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications only concerns the protection of counterfeit goods. This research aims to determine the legal protection for the holder of the Nike trademark on counterfeit shoes in the Klithikan Pakuncen market in Yogyakarta. This study uses a type of combined legal research (normative-empirical) with a legal approach to examine the laws and regulations governing the legal protection of Nike trademark holders on counterfeit shoes circulating in the Klithikan Pakuncen Market, Yogyakarta. The study results concluded that legal protection for holders of counterfeit shoes at the Klithikan Pakuncen Market in Yogyakarta was not effective because the Ministry of Law and Human Rights and the Department of Industry and Commerce had not fully supervised, fostered, nor taken action. Brand infringement which is a complaint offense means that there is not yet complete extra supervision from brand owners to file complaints to parties such as the Ministry of Law and Human Rights and the Department of Industry and Commerce, which should enforce the law instead of doing it passively.

Keywords


Trademark; Counterfeit; Legal Protection

Full Text:

PDF

References


Reference

● Book

Aplin, T., & Davis J, 2013, Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (Second ed.), United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Moore, A. D, 2017, Intellectual Property and Information Control: Philosophic Foundations and Contemporary Issues, United Kingdom: Routledge.

Sugiyono, 2015, Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods), Bandung: Alfabeta.

● Online Sources

● Jurnal Online

Atsar, A, 2017, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengetahuan Dan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Untuk Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Ditinjau Dari UndangUndang No. 5 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemajuan Kebudayaan Dan Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta, LAW REFORM 13 (2), diakses 15 November 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v13i2.16162

Eta, Y, 2014, Rancangan Undang- Undang Pengetahuan Tradisional Dan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Ditinjau Dari Aspek Benefits Pasal 8J UNCBD, Arena Hukum 7 (3), diakses 17 November 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahu kum.2014.00703.8

Sari, M. Y. A. R, 2014, Passing Off Dalam Pendaftaran Merek. Kajian Putusan MA Nomor 224 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2014, Jurnal Yudisial 7 (3), DIAKSES 21 November 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v7i3.75

Nugroho, R. A., & Santoso, B., dan Mahmuda, S, 2016, Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Hak Merek Dagang Terkenal Asing (Well Known Mark) Dari Tindakan Passing Off (Studi Sengketa GS Atas Nama GS Yuasa Corporation), Diponegoro Law Journal 5 (1), diakses 22 November 2020, DOI: https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/12378/12024

Purwaningsih, E, 2012, Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kekayaan Intelektual Warisan Bangsa, Masalah-Masalah Hukum 41 (1), diakses 11 September 2020, DOI: 10.14710/mmh.41.1.2012.42-49

Ramli, T. A., & Sumiyati, 2012, Penyuluhan Tentang Perlindungan Hukum Indikasi Geografis Beras Pandan Wangi Cianjur Jawa Barat Sebagai Wujud Sumbangsih Perguruan Tinggi Dalam Meningkatkan Indeks Pembangunan Manusia (IPM), Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 42 (3), diakses 28 November 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol42.n o3.272

Sakti, M. A, 2019, Karakteristik Dan Problematik Perlindungan Motif Lubeng Tenun Troso, Jurnal Jurisprudence, 9 (2), diakses 19 November 2020, https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v9i2.8908

Sudjana, 2018, Implikasi Perlindungan Indikasi Geografis Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Terhadap Pengembangan Ekonomi Lokal, Veritas et Justitia, 4 (1), diakses 3 Desember 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.2915

Valerie, N., & Hotman, E. S, 2019, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terkenal Christian Dior Ditinjau Dari Konsep Trademark Dilution, Jurnal Cendekia Hukum 4 (2), diakses 16 November 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3376/jch.v4i2.132

Wijaya, E. L. F, 2020, Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Atas Kesamaan Bunyi Merek Terhadap Barang Yang Tidak Sejenis, JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) 5 (2), diakses 20 November 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v5i2.18 7

Yessiningrum, W. S, 2015, Perlindungan Hukum Indikasi Geografis Sebagai Bagian Dari Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 3 (1), diakses 1 Desember 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1 2345/ius.v3i7.198

Internet

“Nomor Merek Nike di Indonesia. Dirjen HKI”, https://pdkiindonesia.dgip.go.id/index.php/merek/ZnV4b1ErWjMwWjVvWGJIZkloNWZTdz09?q=Nike%2C+Inc.dantype=1danskip=0, Acessed on 4th of November 2020.

“Politik hukum hak kekayaan intelektual Indonesia: kritik terhadap WTO/TRIPs Agreement dan upaya membangun hukum kekayaan intelektual demi kepentingan nasional. Mandar Maju”, e- book https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Politik_hukum_hak_kekayaan_intelektual_I.html?id=pZ0mAwEAC AAJ&redir_esc=y, Acessed on 3rd of November 2020.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v18i1.18640

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
Rechtidee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Indexing and Abstracting: