The Full SPECTRUM: Developing a Tripartite Partnership between Community, Government and Academia for Collaborative Social Policy Research
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Problem: In Canadian society, public policies guide the development and administration of social services and systems, including the public education system, the justice system, family services, social housing and income support. However, because social services are often planned and implemented in a ‘siloed’ manner, coordination and collaboration across departments, sectors and organisations is sorely lacking. Data and resource constraints may prevent services being evaluated to ensure they meet the needs of the people for whom they are intended. When the needs of individuals are not addressed, the result is poor outcomes and wasted resources across multiple areas.
Our Response: In 2018, we formed the SPECTRUM Partnership in response to a recognised need for collaborative cross-sector approaches to strengthening the policies that shape social services and systems in our country. The tripartite SPECTRUM partnership comprises representatives from community organisations, government and academia, and is an entity designed to conduct social policy research and evaluation, incorporating interdisciplinary perspectives and expertise from its members. Guided by community-driven research questions and building on existing data resources, SPECTRUM seeks to address specific knowledge gaps in social programs, services and systems. New research findings are then translated into viable public policy options, in alignment with government priorities, and presented to policy-makers for consideration.
Implications: In this practice-based article, we describe the key steps we took to create the SPECTRUM partnership, build our collective capacity for research and evaluation, and transform our research findings into actionable evidence to support sound public policy. We outline four of SPECTRUM’s achievements to date in the hope that the lessons we learned during the development of the partnership may serve as a guide for others aiming to optimise public policy development in a collaborative evidence-based way.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit articles to this journal from 31st March 2014 for publication, agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Open Access Citation Advantage Service). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (ie. a copy of a work which has been published in a UTS ePRESS journal, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the UTS ePRESS publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.
d) Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.
For Volume 6 (2013) and before, the following copyright applied:
Articles published by UTSePress are protected by copyright which is retained by the authors who assert their moral rights. Authors control translation and reproduction rights to their works published by UTSePress. UTSePress publications are copyright and all rights are reserved worldwide. Downloads of specific portions of them are permitted for personal use only, not for commercial use or resale. Permissions to reprint or use any materials should be directed to UTSePress.
References
Bowen, S., Martens, P. and The Need to Know Team (2005) ‘Demystifying knowledge translation: learning from the community’, J Health Serv Res Policy, 10(4), pp. 203–211. doi: 10.1258/135581905774414213.
Brownell, M. et al. (2015) The Educational Outcomes of Children in Care in Manitoba. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy. Available at: http://mchp-appserv.cpe.umanitoba.ca/reference/CIC_report_web.pdf.
Brownell, M. et al. (2020) The Overlap Between the Child Welfare and Youth Criminal Justice Systems: Documenting ‘Cross-Over Kids’ in Manitoba. Winnipeg, MB. Available at: http://mchp-appserv.cpe.umanitoba.ca/reference/MCHP_JustCare_Report_web.pdf.
Brownell, M. D. et al. (2016) ‘Unconditional Prenatal Income Supplement and Birth Outcomes’, Pediatrics, 137(6), p. e20152992. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2992.
Canadian Child Welfare Research Portal (2018) Canadian Statistics (Provincial). Available at: https://cwrp.ca/statistics#provincial (Accessed: 21 September 2020).
Cantor, A. et al. (2015) ‘Training interdisciplinary “wicked problem” solvers: applying lessons from HERO in community-based research experiences for undergraduates’, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2015.1048508, 39(3), pp. 407–419. doi: 10.1080/03098265.2015.1048508.
Chartier, M. et al. (2020) Our Children, Our Future: The Health and Well-being of First Nations Children in Manitoba. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for health Policy. Available at: http://mchp-appserv.cpe.umanitoba.ca/reference/FNKids_Report_Web.pdf.
Choate, P. W. et al. (2018) Assessment of parental capacity for child protection: Methodological, cultural and ethical considerations in respect of Indigenous Peoples. Kingston University. Available at: https://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/id/eprint/42579/1/Choate-P.pdf (Accessed: 14 January 2022).
Cram, F. et al. (2015) ‘Understanding overrepresentation of indigenous children in child welfare data: An application of the drake risk and bias models’, Child Maltreatment, 20(3), pp. 170–182. doi: 10.1177/1077559515580392.
Enns, J. E. et al. (2021) ‘An unconditional prenatal income supplement is associated with improved birth and early childhood outcomes among First Nations children in Manitoba, Canada: a population-based cohort study’, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2021 21:1, 21(1), pp. 1–11. doi: 10.1186/S12884-021-03782-W.
Fallon, B. et al. (2017) ‘How can data drive policy and practice in child welfare? Making the link in Canada’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(10). doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101223.
Falster, K. et al. (2021) ‘Preschool attendance and developmental outcomes at age five in Indigenous and non-Indigenous children: a population-based cohort study of 100 357 Australian children’, J Epidemiol Community Health, 75(4), pp. 371–379. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214672.
Felt, U. et al. (eds) (2017) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 4th edn. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Fortier, J. et al. (2018) ‘Adapting and enhancing PAX Good Behavior Game for First Nations communities: a mixed-methods study protocol developed with Swampy Cree Tribal Council communities in Manitoba’, BMJ Open, 8(2), p. e018454. doi: 10.1136/BMJOPEN-2017-018454.
Garcia-Iriarte, E. et al. (2009) ‘“Who Did What?”: A Participatory Action Research Project to Increase Group Capacity for Advocacy’, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22(1), pp. 10–22. doi: 10.1111/J.1468-3148.2008.00431.X.
Gilbert, R. et al. (2012) ‘Child maltreatment: variation in trends and policies in six developed countries’, Lancet, 379(1474–547X (Electronic)), pp. 758–772. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61087-8.
Hondzel, C. D. and Hansen, R. (2015) ‘Associating creativity, context, and experiential learning’, http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/edui.v6.23403, 6(2). doi: 10.3402/EDUI.V6.23403.
Jasanoff, S. (ed.) (2004) States of Knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. Abingdon, Routledge.
Katz, A. et al. (2019) ‘Population Data Centre Profile: The Manitoba Centre for Health Policy’, International Journal of Population Data Science, 4(2), p. 10. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1131.
Katz, A. et al. (2021) ‘Closing the loop: From system-based data to evidence-influenced policy and practice’, International Journal of Population Data Science, 6(3). doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v7i1.1701.
Kirkness, V. and BarnHardt, R. (2001) ‘First Nations and Higher Education: The Four R’s - Respect, Relevance, Reciprocity, Responsibility’, in Hayoe, R. and Pan, J. (eds) Knowledge Across Cultures: A Contribution to Dialogue among Civilizations. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.
Krakouer, J., Wu Tan, W. and Parolini, A. (2021) ‘Who is analysing what? The opportunities, risks and implications of using predictive risk modelling with Indigenous Australians in child protection: A scoping review’, Australian Journal of Social Issues, 56(2), pp. 173–197. doi: 10.1002/AJS4.155.
Krieger, N. (2011) Epidemiology and the People’s Health: Theory and Context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Krieger, N. (2013) ‘Researching critical questions on social justice and public health: an ecosocial perspective.’, in Levy, B. and Sidel, V. (eds) Social Injustice and Health. 2nd edn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Krieger, N. (2015) ‘Public health, embodied history, and social justice: looking forward’, Int J Health Services, 45, pp. 587–600. doi: 10.1177/0020731415595549.
Lewis, S. (2011) ‘How Has Health Services Research Made a Difference?’, Healthcare Policy, 6(Special Issue), pp. 74–79. doi: 10.12927/HCPOL.2011.22121.
Martens, P. J. and Roos, N. P. (2005) ‘When Health Services Researchers and Policy Makers Interact: Tales from the Tectonic Plates’, Healthcare Policy, 1(1), p. 72. Available at: https://pmc/articles/PMC2585237/ (Accessed: 21 September 2021).
Martin, D. H. (2012) ‘Two-eyed seeing: a framework for understanding indigenous and non-indigenous approaches to indigenous health research.’, The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 44(2), pp. 20–42.
Nickel, N. C. et al. (2021) ‘Differential effects of a school‐based obesity prevention program: A cluster randomized trial’, Maternal & Child Nutrition, 17(1), p. e13009. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13009.
O’Donnell, M., Scott, D. and Stanley, F. (2008) ‘Child abuse and neglect--is it time for a public health approach?’, Aust N Z J Public Health, 32(1326–0200 (Print)), pp. 325–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00249.x.
Oreskes, N. (2019) Why Trust Science? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2010) Developmental evaluation: applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. Guilford Press.
Roos, N. et al. (2010) ‘Enhancing policymakers’ understanding of disparities: relevant data from an information-rich environment’, Milbank Q., 88(3), pp. 382–403. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00604.x.
Sinha, V. et al. (2021) ‘A Review of Literature on the Involvement of Children from Indigenous Communities in Anglo Child Welfare Systems: 1973-2018’, International Indigenous Policy Journal, 12(1), pp. 1–43. doi: 10.18584/IIPJ.2021.12.1.10818.
Smith, M. et al. (2015) ‘Health Services Data: Managing the Data Warehouse: 25 years of Experience at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy’, in Sobolev, B., Levy, A., and Goring, S. (eds) Data and Measures in Health Services Research. Boston, MA: Springer, pp. 1–26.
Spence, K. K. and McDonald, M. A. (2015) ‘Assessing Vertical Development in Experiential Learning Curriculum’: 38(3), pp. 296–312. doi: 10.1177/1053825915571749.
Stukel, T. A. et al. (2007) ‘Analysis of Observational Studies in the Presence of Treatment Selection Bias Effects of Invasive Cardiac Management on AMI Survival Using Propensity Score and Instrumental Variable Methods’, JAMA, 297(3). doi: 10.1001/jama.297.3.278
Tchetgen, E. J. T., Michael, H. and Cui, Y. (2018) ‘Marginal Structural Models for Time-varying Endogenous Treatments: A Time-Varying Instrumental Variable Approach’. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.05422v1 (Accessed: 23 January 2022).
The First Nations Information Governance Centre (2014) Ownership, Control, Access and Possession (OCAP): The Path to First Nations Information Governance. Ottawa: The First Nations Information Governance Centre. Available at: http://fnigc.ca/sites/default/files/docs/ocap_path_to_fn_information_governance_en_final.pdf.
Uddin, M. et al. (2015) ‘Instrumental Variable Analysis in Epidemiologic Studies: An Overview of the Estimation Methods’, Pharmaceutica Analytica Acta, 6(4), p. 1000353. doi: 10.4172/2153-2435.1000353.
Urquia, M. et al. (2020) The Diversity of Immigrants to Manitoba, Migration Dynamics and Basic Healthcare Service Use. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy. Available at: http://mchp-appserv.cpe.umanitoba.ca/reference/IRCC_Report_web.pdf.
Walter, M. and Andersen, C. (2013) Indigenous Statistics: A Quantitative Research Methodology. Taylor & Francis Group. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/umanitoba/detail.action?docID=1418425.
Wang, F. and Hannafin, M. J. (2005) ‘Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments’, Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), pp. 5–23. doi: 10.1007/BF02504682.
Ziman, J. (2000) Real Science: What it is, and what it means. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.