The effects of knowledge and regulation of cognition on the students’ writing skills in a metacognitive process-oriented writing instruction

Wahyu Kyestiati Sumarno, Widya Ratna Kusumaningrum, Eli Nurhayati

Abstract


This current study investigated the correlation between the students’ writing skills and each variable of metacognitive parameters, i.e. knowledge about cognition and regulation of cognition. We also examined the power of the correlation and its direction. We distributed Metacognitive Awareness Inventory for a comprehensive evaluation of the students’ metacognitive awareness, and a writing rubric to assess the students’ academic writing skills. Quantitative analysis by using Pearson Correlation test and Multiple Regression test were employed to check the correlation, and its strength and direction, respectively. The results demonstrated that there was a significant and unidirectional correlation between metacognition and writing skills. Furthermore, it was noted that knowledge about cognition and regulation of cognition together affect the English writing skills with an influence level of up to 41.7%, and each variable of the two parameters gave a great influence on the English writing skills up to 82, 2%. These findings indicated that a student with good metacognitive skills will have good self-regulated learning skills, which enable him to establish reasonable writing goals, plan and strategies, which as a consequence, will improve his writing skills. Pedagogical implication lies in the better understanding of metacognition that will help writing teachers to be supportive and encourage them to develop lesson plans which accommodate this notion.


Keywords


writing instruction; metacognition; knowledge about cognition; regulation of cognition; process writing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alnufaie, M., & Grenfell, M. (2012). EFL Students’ Writing Strategies in Saudi Arabian ESP Writing Classes: Perspectives on Learning Strategies in Self-Access Language Learning. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 3(4), 407–422.

Al-Rawahi, N. M., & Al-Balushi, S. M. (2015). The Effect of Reflective Science Journal Writing on Students’ Self-Regulated Learning Strategies. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(3), 367–379.

Balta, E. E. (2018). The Relationships among Writing Skills, Writing Anxiety and Metacognitive Awareness. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(3), 233–241.

Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, Executive Control, Self-Regulation, and Other More Mysterious Mechanisms (In F. E. Weinert, R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding, pp. 65–116). L. Erlbaum Associates.

Ellis, A. K., Denton, D. W., & Bond, J. B. (2014). An Analysis of Research on Metacognitive Teaching Strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4015–4024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.883

Eluemuno, A., & Azuka-Obieke, U. (2013). The effect of metacognitive skills on performance in the English language among senior secondary school students in Anambra State, Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 4(4), 678–685. https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC142149

Etemadzadeh, A., Seifi, S., & Far, H. R. (2013). The Role of Questioning Technique in developing thinking Skills: The Ongoing Effect on Writing Skill. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1024–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.154

Farahian, M., & Avarzamani, F. (2018). Metacognitive awareness of skilled and less-skilled EFL writers. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0052-4

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Gillespie, A., Graham, S., Kiuhara, S., & Hebert, M. (2014). High school teachers use of writing to support students’ learning: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 27(6), 1043–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9494-8

Haukås, Å., Bjørke, C., & Dypedahl, M. (2018). Metacognition in Language Learning and Teaching. Routledge. https://bora.uib.no/bora-xmlui/handle/1956/18739

Kadmiry, M. (2021). The Comparison between the Process-oriented Approach and the Product-oriented Approach in Teaching Writing The Case of Moroccan EFL Students in Preparatory Classes for the Grandes Ecoles. Arab World English Journal, 12(1), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no1.14

Kaya, B., & Ateş, S. (2016). The Effect of Process-Based Writing Focused on Metacognitive Skills-Oriented to Fourth Grade Students’ Narrative Writing Skill. TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM, 41(187). https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.6752

Lavelle, E., & Bushrow, K. (2007). Writing Approaches of Graduate Students. Educational Psychology, 27, 807–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701366001

Mansor, N., Al-Jarrah, T., & Ab Rashid, R. (2018). The Impact of Metacognitive Strategies on Jordanian EFL Learners’ Writing Performance. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8, 328–339. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n6p328

Naber, J., & Wyatt, T. H. (2014). The effect of reflective writing interventions on the critical thinking skills and dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 34(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.04.002

Negretti, R. (2012). Metacognition in Student Academic Writing: A Longitudinal Study of Metacognitive Awareness and Its Relation to Task Perception, Self-Regulation, and Evaluation of Performance. Written Communication, 29(2), 142–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312438529

Nejmaoui, N. (2019). Improving EFL Learners’ Critical Thinking Skills in Argumentative Writing. English Language Teaching, 12(1), 98–109.

Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (1994). Writing Academic English (4th ed., Vol. 37). Longman.

Özenç, E. G. (2016). The Effect of Process-Oriented Writing Activities on the Achievement and Attitude of the Preservice Primary School Teachers: An Example of Mixed Method Study. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(11), 227–237.

Papleontiou-louca, E. (2003). The concept and instruction of metacognition. Teacher Development, 7(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530300200184

Pelger, S., & Nilsson, P. (2016). Popular Science Writing to Support Students’ Learning of Science and Scientific Literacy. Research in Science Education, 46(3), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9465-y

Ray, A. B., Graham, S., Houston, J. D., & Harris, K. R. (2016). Teachers use of writing to support students’ learning in middle school: A national survey in the United States. Reading and Writing, 29(5), 1039–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9602-z

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

Schreiber, N., Theyßen, H., & Schecker, H. (2016). Process-Oriented and Product-Oriented Assessment of Experimental Skills in Physics: A Comparison. In N. Papadouris, A. Hadjigeorgiou, & C. P. Constantinou (Eds.), Insights from Research in Science Teaching and Learning: Selected Papers from the ESERA 2013 Conference (pp. 29–43). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20074-3_3

Shub, S. J. (1998). Metacognition in adolescent writers. Theses Digitization Project. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/1781

S. Stephenson, N., & P. Sadler-McKnight, N. (2016). Developing critical thinking skills using the Science Writing Heuristic in the chemistry laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00102A

Stewart, G., Seifert, T. A., & Rolheiser, C. (2015). Anxiety and Self-Efficacy’s Relationship with Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions of the Use of Metacognitive Writing Strategies. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2015.1.4

Sumarno, W. K. (2019). Effects of Edmodo-Assisted Process Writing with the Problematized Scaffolding on the Quality of Students’ Writing. Lingua Cultura, 13(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v13i1.5028

Sumarno, W. K. (2020). The Role of Metacognitive Strategies and Awareness in Writing Task Performance. INELTAL Conference Proceedings, 109–115. http://ineltal.um.ac.id/ineltal-2020-proceedings/

Tarricone, P. (2011). The Taxonomy of Metacognition. Psychology Press.

Teng, F. (2016). Immediate and delayed effects of embedded metacognitive instruction on Chinese EFL students’ English writing and regulation of cognition. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.06.005

Teng, (Mark) Feng. (2019). Tertiary-Level Students’ English Writing Performance and Metacognitive Awareness: A Group Metacognitive Support Perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00313831.2019.1595712

Teng, (Mark) Feng. (2020). The role of metacognitive knowledge and regulation in mediating university EFL learners’ writing performance. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(5), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1615493

Teng, (Mark) Feng, & Huang, J. (2019). Predictive Effects of Writing Strategies for Self-Regulated Learning on Secondary School Learners’ EFL Writing Proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 53(1), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.462

Wang, Z., & Han, F. (2017). Metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive control of writing strategy between high-and low-performing Chinese EFL writers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(7), 523–532.

Yanyan, Z. (2010). Investigating the role of metacognitive knowledge in English writing. HKBU Papers in Applied Language Studies, 14, 25–46.

Yarrow, F., & Topping, K. J. (2001). Collaborative writing: The effects of metacognitive prompting and structured peer interaction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 261–282.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies