The authors’ research gap strategies in ELT research article introductions: Does Scopus journal quartile matter?
Abstract
Swales’ (1990) Creating a Research Space (CARS) model has spawned a large number of studies focusing on investigations of research article introductions (RAIs), and the reports have given meaningful contributions to guide novice and non-native authors in writing English RAIs. However, the investigation of authors’ research gap strategies in RAIs has so far received little attention. Also, the previous investigations do not account for the way such strategies are applied across the Scopus journal quartiles (i.e., Q1, Q2, Q3, & Q4). Therefore, this study is undertaken to investigate the research gap strategies used by authors who published their research articles (RAs) in Scopus-indexed journals. The strategies found were, then, compared seen from the Scopus journal quartile lens. Forty RAs from eight Scopus-indexed journals in the field of English Language Teaching (ELT) were randomly collected and analyzed using Swales’ (1990) framework, taking into account the insights proposed by Lim (2012) and Kwan, Chan, and Lam (2012). The findings reveal that the authors use five research gap strategies to present their research gaps in their ELT RAIs. The comparative analysis shows that there are differences and similarities in using research gap strategies across the quartiles. The findings of this study can assist non-native and novice authors to achieve visibility worldwide by giving closer attention to how to present research gaps using several research gap strategies in RAIs.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdolmalaki, S, G, Tan, H, Abdullah, A, N, Sharmini, S, & Imm, L, G. (2019). Introduction chapter of traditional and article-based theses: A comparison of rhetorical structures and linguistic realisations. GEMA Online: Journal of Language Studies, 9(1), 116-135. DOI: 10.17576/gema-2019-1904-10
Adnan, Z. (2009). Some potential problems for research articles written by Indonesian academics when submitted to international English language journals. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 11(1), 107-125. Retrieved on December, 4th 2020, from https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/main-editions-new/some-potential-problems-for-research-articles-written-by-indonesian-academics-when-submitted-to-international-english-language-journals/
Adnan, Z. (2014). Prospects of Indonesian research articles (RAs) being considered for publication in center journals: A comparative study of rhetorical patterns of RAs in selected humanities and hard science discipline. In A. Lyda & K. Warchal (Eds.), Occupying niches: Interculturality, cross-culturality and aculturality in academic research (pp. 79-99). Heidelberg, NY: Springer.
Afshar, H, S., Doosti, M., & Movassagh, H. (2018). A genre analysis of the introduction section of applied linguistic and chemistry research articles. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 21(1), 163-214. Retrieved on November, 4th 2020, from https://www.academia.edu/37720564/A_Genre_Analysis_of_the_Introduction_Section_of_Applied_Linguistics_and_Chemistry_Research_Articles
Amnuai, W. (2017). The textual organization of the discussion sections of accounting research articles. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, xxx, 1–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.kjss.2017.10.007
Arencibia-Jorge, R., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). Challenges in the study of Cuban scientific output. Scientometrics, 83, 723–737. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0150-7
Arono & Arsyad, S. (2019). The effect of genre-based mentoring on rhetorical quality of research article drafts by Indonesian lecturers in social sciences and humanities. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3): 35-50. DOI: 10.29333/iji.2019.1233a
Arsyad, S & Wardhana, D, E, C. (2014). Introduction in Indonesian social sciences and humanities research articles: HOW Indonesian writers justify their research projects. Linguistik Indonesia, 32(2), 149-163. DOI: 10.26499/li.v32i2.23
Arsyad, S. (2013). A genre-based analysis on the introductions of research articles written by Indonesian academics. TEFLIN, 24(2), 180-200. DOI: 10.15639/teflinjournal.v24i2/180-200
Arsyad, S., & Adila, D. (2018). Using local style when writing in English: the citing behaviour of Indonesian authors in English research article introductions. Asian Englishes, 20(2), 170-185. DOI: 10.1080/13488678.2017.1327835
Arsyad, S., & Arono. (2016). Potential problematic rhetorical style transfer from first language to foreign language: a case of Indonesian authors writing research article introductions in English. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 11(2), 315-330. DOI: 10.1080/17447143.2016.1153642
Arsyad, S., Arono, Syaputra, J., Susilawati, Susanti, R., & Musarofah. (2016). Tipe dan fungsi pengutipan di bagian pendahuluan artikel jurnal berbahasa Indonesia. Linguistik Indonesia, 34(2): 163-178. DOI: 10.26499/li.v34i2.48
Arsyad, S., Purwo, B. K., Sukamto, K. E., & Adnan, Z. (2019). Factors hindering Indonesian lecturers from publishing articles in reputable international journals. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 9(1), 42-70. DOI: 10.23971/jefl.v9i1.982
Ball, R., & Tunger, D. (2006). Science indicators revisited-Science Citation Index versus SCOPUS: A bibliometric comparison of both citation databases. Information Service & Use, 26(4), 293-301. DOI: 10.3233/ISU-2006-26404
Barroga, E., & Mitom, H. (2019). Improving scientific writing skills and publishing capacity by developing university-based editing system and writing programs. Journal of Korean medical science, 7(34), 1-8. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e9
Bavdekar, S. B., & Save, S. (2015). Choosing the right journal for a scientific paper. Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 63, 56-58. Retrieved on December, 26th 2021, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280099231_Choosing_the_Right_Journal_for_a_Scientific_Paper
Behnam, B., & Zamanian, J. (2013). Genre Analysis of Oxford and Tabriz Applied Linguistics Research Article Abstracts: From Move Structure to Transitivity Analysis. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(12), 41–59. Retrieved on December, 25th 2020 from http://jal.iaut.ac.ir/article_522025.html
Chen, X., & Li, M. (2019). Chinese learner writers’ niche establishment in the Literature Review chapter of theses: A diachronic perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 39, 48-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.03.006
Chinchilla-Rodrı´guez, Z., Arencibia-Jorge, R., Moya-Anegón, F. d., & Corera-Alvarez, E. (2015). Somes patterns of Cuban scientific publication in Scopus: The current situation and challenges. Scientometrics, 103, 779–794. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1568-8
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46. DOI: 10.1177/001316446002000104
Curry, J., & Lillis, T. (2004). Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: negotiating interests, demands, and rewards. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 663–688. DOI: 10.2307/3588284
Ewijk, A. v. (2018). Persistence and acuteness of research gaps in entrepreneurship education: A systematic content analysis of previous reviews (1987-2017). International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 22(2), 1-18. Retrieved on November, 24th 2020, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326175588_Persistence_and_Acuteness_of_Research_Gaps_in_Entrepreneurship_Education_a_Systematic_Content_Analysis_of_Previous_Reviews_1987-2017
Farnia, M., & Barati, S. (2017). Writing introduction sections of research articles in applied linguistics: cross-linguistic study of native and non-native writers. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 486-494. DOI: 10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8357
Feak, C. B., & Swales, J. M. (2011). Creating contexts. Writing introductions across genres. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Garcia, J. A., Rodriguez-Sa´nchez, R., Fdez-Valdivia, J., & Martinez-Baena, J. (2012). On first quartile journals which are not of highest impact. Scientometrics, 90, 925–943, DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0534-3
Guerrero-Bote, V., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). A further step forward in measuring journal’s scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 674–688. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.001
Hyland, K. (2013). Writing in the university: Education, knowledge and reputation. Language Teaching, 46 (1), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000036
Irawati, L., Saukah, A., & Suharmanto. (2018). Indonesian authors writing their discussion sections both in English and Indonesian research articles. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(3), 448-456. DOI: 10.21831/cp.v38i3.21536
Khany, R., & Tazik, K. (2010). A comparative study of introduction and discussion sections of sub-disciplines of applied linguistics research articles. Journal of Applied Language Studies (JALS), 1(2), 97-122. Retrieved on December, 25th 2020, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312187928_A_Comparative_Study_of_Introduction_and_Discussion_sections_of_Sub-disciplines_of_Applied_Linguistics_Research_Articles
Kurniawan, E., Lubis, A. H., Suherdi, D., & Danuwijaya, A. A. (2019). Rhetorical organization of applied linguistics abstracts: Does scopus journal quartile matter? GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 19(4), 184–202. DOI: 10.17576/gema-2019-1904-10
Kwan, B. S. C., Chan, H., & Lam, C. (2012). Evaluating prior scholarship in literature reviews of research articles: a comparative study of practices in two research paradigms. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 188–201. DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2012.02.003
Lim, J, M. (2012). How do writers establish research niches? A genre-based investigation into management researchers’ rhetorical steps and linguistic mechanisms. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 229–245. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2012.05.002
Mirahayuni, N. K. (2002). Investigating generic structure of English research articles: Writing strategy differences between English and Indonesian writers. TEFLIN Journal: A publication on the teaching and learning of English, 13(1), 22-57. DOI: 10.15639/teflinjournal.v13i1/22-57
Moghaddasi, S., & Graves, H, A, B. (2017). “Since Hadwiger’s conjection is still open”: Establishing a niche for research in discrete mathematics research article introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 45, 69-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.003
Moya-Anegón, F. D., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., Corera-Álvarez, E., Muñoz-Fernández, F. J., González-Molina, A., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2007). Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach, Scientometrics, 73(1), 53-78. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1681-4
Nagy, T. (2016). English as a Lingua Franca and Its Implications for Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologic, 8(2), 155-166. DOI: 10.1515/ausp-2016-0024
Perig, A, V. (2018). Didactic student-friendly approaches to more effective teaching of the fundamentals of scientific research in a digital era of scientometrics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), 1-24. DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/97188
Rahman, M., Darus, S., & Amir, Z. (2017). Rhetorical structure of introduction in applied linguistics research articles. International Journal for Educational Studies, 9(2), 69-84. Retrieved on January, 10th 2021, from https://mindamas-journals.com/educare/article/view/800
Robins, L., & Kanowski. (2008). Ph.D. by publication: A student’s perspective. Journal of Research Practice. 4(2), 1-20. Retrieved on January, 8th 2021, from http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/136/154
Rochma, A. F., Triastuti, A., & Ashadi. (2020). Rhetorical styles of Introduction in English language teaching (ELT) research articles, Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 304-314. DOI: 10.17509/ijal.v10i2.28593
Salisbury, L. (2009). Web of science and Scopus: A Comparative review of content and searching capabilities. The Charleston Advisor. 11(1), 1-14. Retrieved on January, 8th 2021, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263337129_Web_of_Science_and_Scopus_A_Comparative_Review_of_Content_and_Searching_Capabilities
Sheldon, E. (2011). Rhetorical differences in RA introductions written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 238-251. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.08.004
Shibayama, S., & Wang, J. (2020). Measuring originality in science. Scientometrics, 122, 409-427. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03263-0
Sirijanchuen, N., & Gampper, C. (2018). Academic citations within rhetorical move structures in ELT research article introductions written by Thai and International scholars. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Journal, 11(2), 1-20. Retrieved on February, 25th 2021, from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/161504
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, G., & Tingguang, C. (1991). Linguistic, cultural and subcultural issues in contrastive discourse analysis: Anglo-American and Chinese scientific texts. Applied Linguistics, 12, 319-336. DOI: 10.1093/applin/12.3.319
Wannaruk, A., & Amnuai, W. (2015). A comparison of rhetorical move structure of applied linguistics research articles published in international and national Thai journals. RELC Journal, 47(2), 1-19. DOI: 10.1177/0033688215609230
Yayli, D., & Canagarajah, A, S. (2014). A missing move and an emergent step: Variation in the RA introductions of two composition journals. The Reading Matrix, 14(1), 95-111. Retrieved on January, 7th 2021, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1046906
Zainuddin, S. Z. & Shaari, A. H. (2017). Contextual layers in the establishment of research niche in doctoral thesis introductions by Malaysian writers. GEMA Online: Journal of Language Studies, 17(2), 146-162. DOI: 10.17576/gema-2017-1702-09
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies