VALENCY OF CHILD SPEECH IN THE YOUTUBE CHANNEL “STEVE TV SHOW”: SYNTACTIC AND SEMANTIC ANALYSIS

Linatul Laili Izzah, Rohmani Nur Indah

Abstract


Current linguistic studies tend to investigate sentence structure to determine the form of valency in written sentences. However, the study of valency in verbal communication still needs more exploration. This study investigated the types of valency and its arguments used by Ariana Jalia, a 6-year-old child, in her spontaneous utterances during the interview on ‘Steve TV Show’. As a qualitative descriptive study, the purpose was to gain a deep understanding of valency and its arguments found in the child's speech. In the field of semantics, the findings of this study indicated that the utterances produced by Ariana contained four types of valency zero, twelve types of valency one, and three types of verb valency. In addition, the semantic analysis investigated the thematic roles assigned to the argument verbs used by the child. Viewed from the agents, themes, causes, and topics of what Ariana described in her narrative, she employed transitive verbs. The findings shed light on the way children used language in informal and conversational settings and how they constructed sentences with different verb structures to convey their thoughts and ideas. It also highlights the importance of understanding the grammatical structures used by children in order to better support their language development. The need for further research suggests that there is still much to be learned about the early stages of language development and how children use language in various settings.


Keywords


child speech; semantic roles; transitivity; valency

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amalia, D. (2021). The use of verb valency patterns in the Indonesian monolingual learner’s dictionary. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics. Vol.1: 158–168.

Birtić, M., Brač, I., & Runjaić, S. (2017). The Main features of the e-glava online valency dictionary. Proceedings of ELex 2017 Conference, 43–62. https://elex.link/elex2017/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/paper03.pdf.

Čech, R., Pajas, P., & MačUtek, J. (2010). Full valency. Verb valency without distinguishing complements and adjuncts. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 17(4), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2010.512162.

Damanik, S. F., & Mulyadi. (2019). Verb valency in listening comprehension practice of the TOEFL test. Asian Themes in Social Sciences Research, 3(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.33094/journal.139.2019.31.22.27.

Dom, S., Kulikov, L., & Bostoen, K. (2018). Valency-decreasing derivations and quasi-middles in Bantu: A typological perspective. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 36(3), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2018.1552164.

Faulhaber, S. (2011). Verb valency patterns a challenge for semantics-based accounts. In Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219043-021.

Grossman, E., & Witzlack-Makarevich, A. (2019). Valency and transitivity in contact: An overview. Journal of Language Contact, 12(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-01201001.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An Introduction to functional grammar. Hodder Arnold.

Herbst, T., & Klotz, M. (2017). A valency dictionary of English - a project report. Symposium on Lexicography VIII, 1987, 65–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110929836-006.

Lomdin, B., & Iomdin, L. (2011). Valency ambiguity interpretation : what can and what cannot be done. Barcelona. September, 8–9.

Kapanadze, O. (2016). Parallel treebank: Observations for implication of equivalent alignment. International Journal of computational linguistics application. 7 (1): 85-100.

Kreidler, C. W. (2013). Introducing English semantics, second edition. In Introducing English Semantics, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315886428.

Marbun, L. A. Y. (2016). Process types of transitivity system in the national geographic’s articles. The Episteme: Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 3(1), 1–25.

Mosel, Ulrike (1991), “Towards a typology of valency”, in: Seiler, Hansjakob,Waldfried Premper (1991) (Hgg.),Partizipation. Das sprachliche Erfassen vonSachverhalten , Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, pp. 240-251.

Passarotti, M., Saavedra, B. G., & Onambele, C. (2016). Latin Vallex. A treebank-based semantic valency lexicon for Latin. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2016, Lv, 2599–2606.

Przepiórkowski, A., Hajič, J., Hajnicz, E., & Urešová, Z. (2016). Phraseology in two Slavic valency dictionaries: Limitations and perspectives. International Journal of Lexicography, 30(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecv048.

Smirnova, E., & Shustova, S. (2017). Noun-incorporation in English as a valency-changing device. Lingua, 194, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.05.005.

Urešová, Z., Fučíková, E., & Šindlerová, J. (2016). CzEngVallex: a Bilingual Czech-English valency Lexicon. In The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics (Vol. 105, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1515/pralin-2016-0001.

Zhao, Q., & Jiang, J. (2020). Verb valency in interlanguage: An extension to valency theory and new perspective on L2 learning. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 56(2), 339–363. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2020-0010.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v7i1.6890

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Fakultas Sastra 
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara (UISU), Medan
Jl. Sisingamangaraja Teladan Medan 20217
Telp. (061) 7869911, e-mail: language_literacy@sastra.uisu.ac.id