PASSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF ACEHNESE LANGUAGE:  X-BAR ANALYSIS

Rostina Taib; Mulyadi Mulyadi

doi:10.26858/retorika.v16i1.32016

PASSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF ACEHNESE LANGUAGE: X-BAR ANALYSIS

Rostina Taib^(1*), Mulyadi Mulyadi⁽²⁾,

(1) Department of Indonesian Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Syiah Kuala University
(2) Linguistics Departement, Faculty of Humanities, North Sumatera University
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v16i1.32016

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the passive construction in Acehnese Language (AL) by using X- Bar Theory which utilized the oral, written, and the data created by the researcher as the native speaker. This research was conducted in the area of Aceh Besar, Aceh Pidie, and Aceh Utara. There were 12 informants selected and the data were taken orally, and in a written manner. The data collection was conducted through recording technique and note taking technique. After collecting the data, the researcher applied introspection technique through elicitation technique. The result of this research exhibits that the passive construction in Acehnese Language is in the form of syntactical passive. There is no morphological passive form discovered in this language because there is no marker found in the verb as the passive marker morphologically. Besides that, verb in Acehnese Language is aligned with subject as the agent of an action in the active construction. In the passive construction, the verb must agree with the action which functions as the complementary. In order to determine the passive construction in this language, the constituents in the sentence must be viewed holistically. The only one passive marker that can be identified is the preposition of le ‘by’. Based on the X-Bar analysis conducted to show the passive construction in Acehnese Language it is found that specifier, complement, and adverb play important roles to construct it. Specifier is an internal structure that is required to be positioned by NP, and is combined to become I’ and form IP.

Keywords

passive construction, acehnese language, X-Bar theory

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alwi, Hasan, E. al. (2003). Tata Bahasa Baku Indonesian: (Edisi ke-3). Balai Pustaka.

Asyik, A. G. (1987). A Contextual Grammar of Acehnese Sentence. The University of Michigan.

Badudu, J. (1978). Morfologi. Fakultas Keguruan dan Seni IKIP Bandung.

Balukh, J. I. (2006). Aspek-aspek Mikro Bahasa Rote. UPTD Bahasa Dinas Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Provinsi NTT.

Chaer, A. (2008). Morfologi Indonesian (Pendekatan Proses). Rineka Cipta.

Chung, S. F. (2005). Kena as a Third Type of the Malay. Oceanic Linguistics, 44, 194–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2005.0017.

Comrie, B. (1983). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Basil Blackwell Published Limited.

Cook, Walker A., S. (1979). Case Grammar: Development of the Matrix Model. Georgetown University Press.

Culicover, P. . (1997). Principles and Paramaters: An Introduction to Syntaxt Theory. Oxford University Press.

Dalrymple, M. (2001). Syntax and Semantics 34: Lexical Functional Grammar. University of Oxford. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9781849500104.

Dixon, R. M. . (2012). Dixon, R.M.W. 2012, Basic Linguistic Theory. Further Grammatical Topics Volume 3 New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sl.38.4.11hau.

Djajasudarma, F. (2006). Metode Linguistik: Rancangan Metode Penelitian dan Kajian. PT Refika Aditama.

Djunaidi, A. (1996). Relasi-Relasi Gramatikal dalam Bahasa Aceh: Suatu Telaah Berdasarkan Teori Tata Bahasa Relasional. Universitas Padjajaran.

Fitriyani, D. Z. M. (2017). Kalimat Introgatif dalam Bahasa Minang Kabau: Teori X-Bar. Retorika: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, Vol. 3. No, 188-200J. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22225/jr.3.1.229.188-200.

Haegemen. (1992). Introduction to Goverment and Binding Theory. Blackwell.

Haspelmath, M. (2002). Understanding Morphology. Arnold. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271018639_Understanding_Morphology/link/571f679608aefa64889a73b9/download.

Iqbal, M. (2011). Sistem Diatesis Aktif dan Pasif dalam Bahasa Aceh: Analisis Morfosintaksis. Universitas Padjadjaran.

Iskandar, D. (2021). Tipologi Sintaksis Bahasa Aceh. Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Khasanah, N. (2020). Frasa Preposisi Bahasa Kedang: Analisis X-Bar. Skripta., Vol.6. No. https://journal.upy.ac.id/index.php/skripta/article/view/643/703.

Kosmas, J. (2015). Konstruksi Pasif Bahasa Manggarai: Sebuah Analisis Leksikal – Fungsional. Retorika: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, Vol. 1 No. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.1.1.16.108-122.

Kridalaksana, H. (2008). Kelas Kata Dalam Indonesian. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kroeger, P. R. (2004). Analyzing Syntax: A Lexical Fungsional Approach. Cambridge University Press.

Lubis, I. S. & M. (2020). Konstruksi Pasif Bahasa Angkola: Teori X- Bar. Jurnal Education and Development, Vol.8 No.1. http://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/view/1575.

Moleong, L. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Revisi). PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyadi. (2010). Frasa Preposisi Bahasa Indonesa: Analisis X-Bar. Jurnal Kajian Sastra, 34 (1), 1–12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277729767_FRASE_PREPOSISI_BAHASA_INDONESIA_ANALISIS_X_BAR

Napoli, D. (1996). Linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Nguyen, M. C. (2008). Vietnamese Passive Sentences from a Typological Perspective. The 18th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Sociaety. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277093107_Vietnamese_Passive_Sentences_from_a_Typological_Perspective.

Nomoto, H., & Wahab, K. A. (2011). Konstruksi Pasif Kena dalam Indonesian:Perbandingan dengan Bahasa Melayu. International Symposium on Malay/Indonesian Linguistics, 24–26.

Oktaviyanti, N. (2012). Kontrastivitas Kalimat Pasif Indonesian dengan Bahasa Jepang (Kajian Struktur dan Makna). Students E-Journal, Vol. 1 No., 1–9. https://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/ejournal/article/view/487.

Purwo, B. K. (1989). Serpih-serpih Telaah Pasif Indonesian. Yogyakarta: Kanasius.

Sembiring, H. B. M. (2019). Peralatan Dapur Dalam Bahasa Karo Kajian Metabahasa Semantik Alami. Jurnal Unimed, vol 8. No. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24114/bss.v8i2.14466.

Sudaryanto. (1991). Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Jawa. Duta Wacana University Press.

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Sanata Darma.

Sugono, D. (1994). Berbahsa Indonesia dengan Benar. Puspa Swara.

Suparman, H. (1988). Analisis Bahasa dari Tatawacana Hingga Tatabunyi. FKIP Unhud.

Tadjuddin, M. (2004). Batas Bahasaku Batas Duniaku. PT Alumni.

Taib, R. (2019). Sintaksis. Banda Aceh.

Wulandari, Rifa Suci, D. (2017). Analisis Struktur Kalimat Pasif Bahasa Inggris dan Indonesian melalui Contrastive Recognition. Deiksis, Vol. 09 No, 374-384.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 224 times | PDF view : 32 times

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published by:

Department of Indonesian Language, Faculty of Languages and Literature, Universitas Negeri Makassar in cooperate with Asosiasi Dosen Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia (ADOBSI) and Ikatan Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia (IKAPROBSI).

Address: Department of Indonesian Language Office, DG Building Second Floor, UNM Parangtambung, Daeng Tata Raya Street, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Email: retorika@unm.ac.id