Teaching and Learning Design Management tools during the sanitary emergency = Enseñanza y A prendizaje de herramientas de Gestión de Diseño durante la emergencia sanitaria
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20868/abe.2023.1.5085
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Resumen
Durante el año 2020, la normativa de la emergencia sanitaria obligó a las universidades a impartir la docencia bajo la modalidad de enseñanza a distancia, lo que representó un desafío en el diseño de cursos que requieren una alta efectividad. El propósito de este trabajo es presentar las estrategias que se aplicaron con éxito durante la enseñanza y aprendizaje de las herramientas de gestión del diseño de un proyecto de edificación, implementadas en un curso de la maestría en Ingeniería Civil de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. La metodología consideró el efecto de la Pandemia del Covid-19 y tuvo como objetivo desarrollar habilidades blandas y empleabilidad, para lo cual se propuso un uso equilibrado de plataformas colaborativas virtuales, así como software para videoconferencia y laboratorios. Por otro lado, durante esta asignatura, los estudiantes desarrollaron una propuesta de planificación y gestión integrada de la fase de diseño utilizando herramientas de guías y directrices de sistemas de gestión de proyectos. Bajo este marco, se analizó la participación de los interesados, la toma de decisiones multicriterio, el desarrollo de los entregables del diseño del proyecto y la secuencia del proyecto. El éxito de esta metodología se refleja en la alta calidad de los trabajos y exposiciones finales, el resultado de las encuestas realizadas -eficacia del 99%-, y en las oportunidades de mejora detectadas. Se diseñó e implementó una asignatura no presencial flexible y exitosa, que podría adaptarse a la modalidad Blended Learning.
Abstract
During the year 2020, the sanitary emergency norm forced universities to teach under the remote learning method, representing a challenge of designing courses that require high effectiveness. The purpose of this work is to present the strategies that were successfully applied during the teaching and learning of design management tools for a building project, implemented in a course of the Civil Engineering master of the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru. The methodology considered the effect of the Covid-19 Pandemic and had as objective to develop soft skills and employability, for which a balanced use of virtual collaborative platforms as well as software was proposed for videoconference and laboratories. On the other hand, during this subject, students developed a proposal for integrated planning and management of the design phase using tools of norms and guidelines of construction management systems. Under this framework, the participation of stakeholders, multicriteria decision making, development of project design deliverables and project sequence was analyzed. The success of this methodology is reflected in the high quality of final papers and expositions, the result of surveys taken - effectiveness of 99%-, and in the improvement opportunities detected. A flexible and successful non-face to face subject was designed and implemented, which could be adapted to the Blended Learning modality.
Palabras clave
Referencias
World Health Organization. (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19).
Ministerio de Salud del Perú. (2020). Resolución Ministerial N° 448-2020/MINSA Lineamientos para la vigilancia, prevención y control de la salud por exposición al SARS-CoV-2.
Ministerio de Vivienda, Construcción y Saneamiento del Perú. (2020). Resolución Ministerial Nº 087-2020 Protocolo Sanitario Sectorial.
Ministerio de Educación del Perú. (2020). Resolución Viceministerial N° 157-2020/MINEDU Orientaciones para el desarrollo del servicio educativo en los Centros de Educación Técnico-Productiva e Institutos y Escuelas de Educación Superior, durante la Emergencia Sanitaria causada por el COVID-19.
Quezada, R.L., Talbot, C. and Quezada-Parker, K.B. (2020). From Bricks and Mortar to Remote Teaching: A Teacher Education Programs Response to COVID-19. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46:4, 472-483.
National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2015). Professional Standards for Educational Leaders. Reston, VA: Author.
Geng, S., Law, K. M. and Niu, B. (2019). Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16:1, 1-22.
Stone, C. and Springer, M. (2019). Interactivity, connectedness and “teacher-presence”: Engaging and retaining students online. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 59:2, 146–169.
Sandars, J., Correia, R., Dankbaar, M. et al. (2020). Twelve tips for rapidly migrating to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic [version 1]. MedEdPublish, 9:82, 1-20.
Alqahtani, A.Y. and Rajkhan, A.A. (2020). E-Learning Critical Success Factors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comprehensive Analysis of E-Learning Managerial Perspectives. Education Sciences, 10:9, 216.
Gamage, K.A.A., Wijesuriya, D.I., Ekanayake, S.Y., Rennie, A.E.W., Lambert, C.G. and Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online Delivery of Teaching and Laboratory Practices: Continuity of University Programmes during COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences, 10:10, 291.
Miranda, J. et al. (2021). The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 93, 107278.
Sawhney, A., Riley, M. & Irizarry, J. (2020). Construction 4.0—An Innovation Platform for the Built Environment. Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2020; ISBN 978-0-429-39810-0.
Project Management Institute. (2016). Construction Extension to the PMBOK® Guide. Newtown Square, PA, USA: Project Management Institute, Third Ed.
Sacks, R., Eastman, C., Lee, G. and Teicholz, P. (2018). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers. Wiley.
Leon, I., Sagarna, M., Mora, F. and Otaduy, J.P. (2021). BIM Application for Sustainable Teaching Environment and Solutions in the Context of COVID-19. Sustainability, 13, 4746.
Paes, D., Arantes, E., & Irizarry, J. (2017). Immersive environment for improving the understanding of architectural 3D models: Comparing user spatial perception between immersive and traditional virtual reality systems. Automation in Construction, 84, 292-303.
Brioso, X., Calderon-Hernandez, C., Aguilar, R. and Pando, M.A. (2019). Preliminary Methodology for the Integration of Lean Construction, BIM and Virtual Reality in the Planning Phase of Structural Intervention in Heritage Structures. RILEM Book Series, Volume 18, 2019, Pages 484-492.
Irizarry, J. and Bastos, D. (2016). Exploratory study of potential applications of unmanned aerial systems for construction management tasks. Journal of Management in Engineering, 32:3. ASCE.
Brioso, X., Calderon-Hernandez, C., Irizarry, J. and Paes, D. (2019). Using Immersive Virtual Reality to Improve Choosing by Advantages System for the Selection of Fall Protection Measures Comput. Civ. Eng. 2019 Vis. Inf. Model. Simul. - Sel. Pap. from ASCE Int. Conf. Comput. Civ. Eng. 2019, no. June. 146–153.
Suhr, J. (1999). The Choosing by Advantages Decision making System. Quorum, Westport, CT, 293 pp.
Santa-Cruz, S., Córdova-Arias, C., Brioso, X. & Vázquez-Rowe, I. (2021). Transparency-based protocol for decision-making regarding seismic rehabilitation projects of public buildings. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 55, 102-116
Suarez, J.C., Zapata, J. & Brioso, X. (2020). Using 5D Models and CBA for Planning the Foundations and Concrete Structure Stages of a Complex Office Building. In: Proc. 28th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). Berkeley, California, USA, 6-10 Jul 2020. pp 913-924.
Arroyo, P., Mourgues, C., Flager, F. & Correa, M.G. (2018). A new method for applying choosing by advantages (CBA) multicriteria decision to a large number of design alternatives. Energy and Buildings, 167, 30-37.
Schöttle, A., Arroyo, P. and Bade, M. (2015). Comparing Three Methods in the Tendering Procedure to Select the Project Team. In: Proc. 23rd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. Perth, Australia, 29-31 Jul 2015. pp 267-276
Brioso, X., and Calderon-Hernandez, C. (2019). Improving the Scoring System with the Choosing by Advantages (CBA) elements to evaluate Construction-Flows using BIM and Lean Construction. ABE (Advances in Building Education / Innovación Educativa en la Edificación), 3 (2), pp. 9-34.
Rother, M. and Shook, J. (2003). Learning to see: value stream mapping to add value and eliminate muda. Lean Enterprise Institute.
Pasqualini, F. and Zawislak, P.A. (2005). Value stream mapping in construction: A case study in a Brazilian construction Company. In: Proc. 13th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. Sydney, Australia, 19-21 Jul 2005. pp 117-125.
Murguia, D., Brioso, X. and Pimentel, A. (2016). Applying Lean Techniques to Improve Performance in the Finishing Phase of a Residential Building. In: Proc. 24th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 20-22 Jul 2016. pp. 43–52.
Cruzado-Ramos, F. and Brioso, X. (2020) Sustainability Performance Evaluation in Building Projects by Integrating Lean and Sustainable Management Using the Delphi Method. In: Proc. 28th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). Berkeley, California, USA, 6-10 Jul 2020. pp. 805-816.
Landeta, J. (2006). Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(5), 467–482.
Hallowell, M. R. and Gambatese, J.A. (2010). Qualitative research: application of the Delphi method to CEM research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(1), 99-107.
Pontifical Catholic University of Peru. (2018). Institutional Strategic Plan 2018-2022, Lima, Peru.
Gao, Z., Ezekwem, K. and Aslam, M. (2020). An Integration of BIM and GIS for Integrated Project Delivery. Construction Research Congress. March 8–10, 2020 | Tempe, Arizona.
Brioso, X. (2015). Teaching Lean Construction: Pontifical Catholic University of Peru Training Course in Lean Project & Construction Management. Procedia Engineering, 123 (2015) 85 – 93.
Brioso, X., Humero, A. and Calampa, S. (2016). Comparing Point-to-Point Precedence Relations and Location-Based Management System in Last Planner System: A Housing Project of Highly Repetitive Processes Case Study. Procedia Engineering, 164 (2016), pp. 12–19.
Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). Newtown Square, PA, USA: Project Management Institute, 6th Ed
Brioso, X., Murguia, D. and Urbina, A. (2017). Teaching Takt-Time, Flowline, and Point-to-Point Precedence Relations: A Peruvian Case Study. Procedia Engineering, 196, pp. 666-673.
Aslam, M., Gao, Z., & Smith, G. (2021). Integrated implementation of Virtual Design and Construction (VDC) and lean project delivery system (LPDS). Journal of Building Engineering, 39, 102252.
Brioso, X. (2015). Integrating ISO 21500 Guidance on Project Management, Lean Construction, and PMBOK. Procedia Engineering, 123 pp. 76 – 84.
Daniel, S. J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49, 91–96.
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Copyright (c) 2023 Autor / BY-NC-ND
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.