Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Malpraktik Layanan Kesehatan Berbasis Telemedicine

Muhamad Azhar; Utik Handayani

doi:10.14710/ldjr.6.2023.51-65

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.6.2023.51-65

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Malpraktik Layanan Kesehatan Berbasis Telemedicine

*Muhamad Azhar

- Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Utik Handayani - Perawat & Anggota PPNI, RSUD Ir. Sukarno Sukoharjo, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{LDJR19006,
    author = {Muhamad Azhar and Utik Handayani},
    title = {Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Malpraktik Layanan Kesehatan Berbasis Telemedicine},
    journal = {Law,  Development and Justice Review},
  volume = {6},
    number = {1},
    year = {2023},
    keywords = {telemedicine; malpractice; legal protection; and health services.},
    abstract = { Every organization of health services always has the potential to pose risks that can be detrimental to patients, including telemedicine-based health services. Telemedicine is a form of electronic-based health service so that doctors and patients cannot meet face to face. Currently there are 3 regulations governing telemedicine, namely Permenkes No. 20 of 2019, Decree of the Minister of Health Number HK.01.07/MENKES/4829/2021 Concerning Guidelines for Health Services Through Telemedicine During the Corona Virus Disease 2019 Pandemic, and Perkonsil No.74 of 2020. However, there are no regulations that concretely regulate legal protection for patients who feel aggrieved by telemedicine-based health services. This article discusses the legal relationship and risks of providing telemedicine-based health services as well as legal protection for patients who experience losses in these services. In the implementation of Telemedicine, there is a legal relationship between the patient, the doctor and the platform. It should be remembered that services for health that require direct action cannot be carried out through telemedicine so that each party in telemedicine needs to understand that there are conditions that can be carried out with telemedicine and not. The form of doctor's responsibility in telemedicine is the absolute responsibility of the doctor for his patient, and the patient's prosecution rights in telemedicine are similar to face-to-face-based health services. },
   issn = {2655-1942},   pages = {51--65}  doi = {10.14710/ldjr.6.2023.51-65},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/lj/article/view/19006}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Every organization of health services always has the potential to pose risks that can be detrimental to patients, including telemedicine-based health services. Telemedicine is a form of electronic-based health service so that doctors and patients cannot meet face to face. Currently there are 3 regulations governing telemedicine, namely Permenkes No. 20 of 2019, Decree of the Minister of Health Number HK.01.07/MENKES/4829/2021 Concerning Guidelines for Health Services Through Telemedicine During the Corona Virus Disease 2019 Pandemic, and Perkonsil No.74 of 2020. However, there are no regulations that concretely regulate legal protection for patients who feel aggrieved by telemedicine-based health services. This article discusses the legal relationship and risks of providing telemedicine-based health services as well as legal protection for patients who experience losses in these services. In the implementation of Telemedicine, there is a legal relationship between the patient, the doctor and the platform. It should be remembered that services for health that require direct action cannot be carried out through telemedicine so that each party in telemedicine needs to understand that there are conditions that can be carried out with telemedicine and not. The form of doctor's responsibility in telemedicine is the absolute responsibility of the doctor for his patient, and the patient's prosecution rights in telemedicine are similar to face-to-face-based health services.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: telemedicine; malpractice; legal protection; and health services.

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : ID

In Vol 6, No 1 (2023): Law, Development & Justice Review

Recent articles

Analisis Hambatan dan Solusi Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen dalam Jual Beli Tas Branded Via Tiktok Shop Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Mengenai Peredaran Makanan Kadaluarsa Ditinjau Dari UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Kekuatan Eksitensi Bisnis Waralaba Sebagai Perjanjian Innominaat Di Indonesia More recent articles

R. Soeroso. 2011. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Mustajah, ‘Analisis Yuridis Hubungan Hukum Antara Dokter dan Pasien Dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan’ (2013) 4 (1) Jurnal Hukum Legal Opinion 2
Ricky, ‘Aspek Hukum Praktik Kedokteran Tindakan Medis Yang Bukan Kewenangan Kompetensi Profesi’ (2020) 2 (5) LEX Renaissance 403, 405
Abigail Prasetyo & Dyah Hapsari Prananingrum. Disrupsi Layanan Kesehatan Berbasis Telemedicine, Refleksi Hukum, VI (2
Syahadah Siregar & Abdul Halim bin Ahmad, 2017, Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pasien Korban Tindakan Malpraktek Dokter, IX (2)
Henny Saida Flora. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Malpraktik Medis Vol 3 No 01 (2018): Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan, Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan
Kertha Wicara, Anak Agung Ngurah Bagus Agung Wira Nantha, A. Ngurah Oka Yudistira Darmadi : Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pasien Yang Menjadi Korban Malpraktik Pengobatan Tradisional, Journal Ilmu Hukum, Vol 11 No 1 (2021)
Alief Sugiarto, Hambali Thalib, Said Sampara, Kebijakan Perlindungan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Malpraktik Di Bidang Medis, Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG), Vol. 1 No. 3 (2020): Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG)

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to LDJR and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.

LDJR and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in MMH journal are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.

(Penulis yang mengirimkan naskah melakukannya dengan pengertian bahwa jika diterima untuk publikasi, hak cipta artikel tersebut akan diberikan kepada LDJR dan Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro sebagai penerbit jurnal. Hak cipta mencakup hak untuk mereproduksi dan mengirimkan artikel dalam semua bentuk dan media, termasuk cetak ulang, foto, mikrofilm, dan reproduksi serupa lainnya, serta terjemahannya. LDJR dan Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro dan Editor berusaha keras untuk memastikan bahwa tidak ada data, pendapat, atau pernyataan yang salah atau menyesatkan dipublikasikan di jurnal. Dengan cara apa pun, isi artikel dan iklan yang diterbitkan dalam jurnal MMH adalah tanggung jawab masing-masing penulis dan pengiklan.)