Coping with informational atomism - one of Jerry Fodor’s legacies
Abstract
Abstract: Fodor was passionately unwilling to compromise. Of his several commitments, I focus here on informational atomism. Fodor staunchly rejected semantic holism for two conspiring reasons. He took it to threaten his commitment to the nomic character of psychological explanation. He also took it to pave the way towards relativism, which he found deeply offensive. In this paper, I reconstruct the strands of Fodor’s commitment to the computational version of the representational theory of mind that led him to informational atomism. I take issue with three features of informational atomism. First, I argue that it deprives content from its expected causal role in psychological explanation. Secondly, I take issue with Fodor’s claim that only informational atomism can meet the requirements of the principle of compositionality. Finally, I argue that informational atomism yields a bloated or unwieldy category of nomic properties.
Keywords: Informational Atomism; Representational Theory of Mind; Psychological Explanation; Principle of Compositionality; Jerry A. Fodor
Fare i conti con l’atomismo informazionale: uno dei lasciti di Jerry Fodor
Riassunto: Fodor è stato fortemente maldisposto al compromesso. Tra le molte cose di cui si è occupato, intendo qui concentrarmi sull’atomismo informazionale. Fodor ha coerentemente rifiutato l’olismo semantico per due ragioni convergenti. Lo vedeva come minaccia per il suo impegno verso il carattere nomico della spiegazione psicologica e come porta aperta verso il relativismo, cosa che considerava profondamente minacciosa. In questo lavoro, intendo riprendere le fila dell’impegno di Fodor verso la versione computazionale della teoria rappresentazionale della mente che lo ha portato all’atomismo informazionale, chiarendo tuttavia che non sono d’accordo con tre aspetti dell’atomismo informazionale. In primo luogo, mostrerò come questo sottragga al contenuto il suo ruolo causale nella spiegazione psicologica. In secondo luogo, non sono d’accordo con l’affermazione di Fodor per cui solo l’atomismo informazionale possa soddisfare i requisiti del principio di composizionalità. Illustrerò infine come l’atomismo informazionale ceda il passo a un insieme di proprietà nomiche ampio o difficile da gestire.
Parole chiave: Atomismo informazionale; Teoria rappresentazionale della mente; Spiegazione psicologica; Principio di composizionalità; Jerry A. Fodor
Parole chiave
Full Text
PDFRiferimenti bibliografici
Block, N. (1998). Holism: Mental nd semantic. In: Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy, Routledge, London –doi: 10.4324/9780415249126-W015-1).
Branson, K. (2017). Obituary: Jerry Fodor, Rutgers university philosopher, pioneer of cognitive science among the late 20th and early 21st centuries, 2017 - URL: https://news.rutgers.edu/obi-tuary-jerry-fodor-rutgers-university-philosopher-pioneer-cognitive-science/20171201#.WpR4k2bMzOT.
Brentano, F. (1973). Psychology from an empirical standpoint (1874), translated by A.C. Rancurello, D.B. Terrell, L.L. McAlister, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Burge, T. (1979). Individualism and the mental. In: P. French, T.E. Uehling, H.K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. IV, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 73-122.
Crane, T. (1998). The mechanical mind. A philosophical introduction to minds, machines and mental representations, Routledge, London.
Dennett, D.C. (1971). Intentional systems. In: «The Journal of Philosophy», vol. LXVIII, n. 4, pp. 87-106.
Dretske, F. (1981). Knowledge and the flow of information, MIT Press, Cambridge(MA).
Dretske, F. (1988). Explaining behavior, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
Dretske, F. (1995). Naturalizing the mind, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
Field, H. (1972). Tarski’s theory of truth. In: «The Journal of Philosophy», vol. LXIX, n. 13, pp. 347-375.
Fodor, J.A. (1975). The language of thought, Crowell, New York 1975.
Fodor, J.A. (1983). The modularity of mind, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
Fodor, J.A. (1987). Psychosemantics. The problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
Fodor, J.A. (1990). A theory of content and others essays, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
Fodor, J.A. (1994). The elm and the expert, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
Fodor, J.A. (1995). Concepts: A potboiler. In: «Philosophical Issues», vol. VI, pp. 1-24.
Fodor, J.A. (1998). Concepts. Where cognitive science went wrong, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Fodor, J.A. (2000). The mind does not work this way, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
Fodor, J.A. (2001). Language, thought and compositionality. In: «Mind & Language», vol. XVI, n. 1, pp. 1-15.
Fodor, J.A. (2003). Hume variations, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Fodor, J.A. (2004). Having concepts: A brief refutation of the Twentieth Century. In: «Mind & Language», vol. XIX, n. 1, pp. 29-47.
Fodor, J.A. (2009). LOT2. The language of thought revisited, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Frege, G. (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. In: «Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik», NF, n. 100, pp. 25-50.
Geach, P. (1969). God and the soul, Routledge, New york/London.
Horwich, P. (1998). Concept constitution. In: «Philosophical Issues», vol. IX, pp. 15-19.
Jacob, P. (1997). What minds can do, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Jacob, P. (2005). Recognitional concepts and conceptual combination. In: M. Werning, E. Machery, G. Schurz (eds.), The compositionality of meaning and content, vol. I: Foundational Issues, Ontos Verlag, Frankfurt a.M., pp. 135-146.
Jacob, P. (2010). The scope and limits of Chomsky’s naturalism. In: J. Bricmont, J. Franck (eds.) Chomsky Notebook, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 211-234.
Loewer, B., Rey, G. (1991). Editors’ Introduction. In: B. Loewer, G. Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind, Fodor and his Critics, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. xi-xxxvii.
Millikan, R.G. (1984). Language, thought and other biological categories, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
Millikan, R.G. (1993). White queen. Psychology and other essays for Alice, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
Millikan, R.G. (2004). Varieties of meaning, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
Neander, K. (1995). Misrepresenting and malfunctioning. In: «Philosophical Studies», vol. LXXIX, n. 2, pp. 109-141.
Neander, K. (2017). A mark of the mental: In defense of informational semantics, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
Pacherie, E. (1994). Holophobia. In: «Acta Analytica», vol. XII, n. 12, pp. 105-112.
Peacocke, C. (2004). Fodor on concepts: Philosophical aspects. In: «Mind & Language», vol. XV, n. 2-3, pp. 327-340.
Putnam, H. (1975). The analytic and the synthetic (1962). In: H. Putnam, Mind, language, and reality. Philosophical papers, vol. II, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 33-69.
Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of “meaning” (1974). In: H. Putnam, Mind, Language, and Reality, Philosophical Papers, vol. II, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 215-271.
Putnam, H. (1994). Sense, nonsense, and the senses: An inquiry into the powers of the human mind. In: «The Journal of Philosophy», vol. XCI, n. 9, pp. 445-517.
Quine, W.V.O. (1966). Truth by convention (1936). In: W.V.O. Quine, Ways of paradox and other essays, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA), pp. 77-106.
Quine, W.V.O. (1953). Two dogmas of empiricism (1950). In: W.V.O. Quine, From a logical point of view, Harper Torchbook, New York, pp. 20-46.
Quine, W.V.O. (1960). Word and object, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
Quine, W.V.O. (1966). Carnap and logical truth (1963). In: W.V.O. Quine, Ways of paradox and other essays, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA) 1966, pp. 107-132.
Quine, W.V.O. (1990). Pursuit of truth, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
Recanati, F. (2002). The Fodorian fallacy. In: «Analysis», vol. LXII, n. 4, pp. 285-289.
Rey, G. (2018). Remembering Jerry Fodor and his work. In: «Mind & Language», vol. XXXIII, n. 4, pp. 321-341.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Stich, S. (1983). From folk psychology to cognitive science. The case against belief, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4453/rifp.2020.0002
Copyright (c) 2020 Pierre Jacob
URLdella licenza: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Rivista internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia - ISSN: 2039-4667 (print) - E-ISSN: 2239-2629 (online)
Registrazione al Tribunale di Milano n. 634 del 26-11-2010 - Direttore Responsabile: Aurelia Delfino
Web provider Aruba spa - Loc. Palazzetto, 4 - 52011 Bibbiena (AR) - P.IVA 01573850516 - C.F. e R.I./AR 04552920482
Dove non diversamente specificato, i contenuti di Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia sono distribuiti con Licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.