Negotiated Precarity in the Global South: A Case Study of Migration and Domestic Work in South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v2020i14.1971Keywords:
domestic work, gernder, migrant labour, precarity, race, South AfricaAbstract
This article explores precarity as a conceptual framework to understand the intersection of migration and low-waged work in the global south. Using a case study of cross-border migrant domestic workers in South Africa, I discuss current debates on framing and understanding precarity, especially in the global south, and test its use as a conceptual framework to understand the everyday lived experiences and strategies of a group that face multiple forms of exclusion and vulnerability. I argue that a form of negotiated precarity, defined as transactions which provide opportunities for survival but also render people vulnerable, can be a useful way to make sense of questions around (il)legality and (in)formality in the context of poorly protected work, insecure citizenship and social exclusion. Precarity as a negotiated strategy shows the ways in which people interact with systems and institutions and foregrounds their agency. But it also illustrates that the negative outcomes inherent in more traditional notions of precarity, expressed in physical and economic vulnerability, and discrimination in employment relations, mostly hurt the poor. This suggests the importance of an intersectional approach to understanding precarity in labour migration studies.
References
Ally, S. (2009). From servants to workers: South African domestic workers and the democratic state. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Amit, R., & Kriger, N. (2014). Making migrants ‘il-legible’: The policies and practices of documentation in post-apartheid South Africa. Kronos, 40(1), 269-290.
Andall, J. (2017). Gender, migration and domestic service: The politics of black women in Italy. London: Routledge.
Anderson, B. (2010). Migration, immigration controls and the fashioning of precarious workers. Work, Employment & society, 24(2), 300-317.
Arat-Koc, S. (1989). In the privacy of our own home: Foreign domestic workers as solution to the crisis in the domestic sphere in Canada. Studies in Political Economy, 28(1), 33-58.
Bakan, A. B., & Stasiulis, D. K. (1995). Making the match: Domestic placement agencies and the racialization of women's household work. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society, 20(2), 303-335.
Bakan, A. B., & Stasiulis, D. K. (Eds.). (1997). Not one of the family: Foreign domestic workers in Canada. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
Banki, S. (2013). Precarity of place: A complement to the growing precariat literature. Global Discourse, 3(3-4), 450-463.
Barchiesi, F. (2011). Precarious liberation: Workers, the state, and contested social citizenship in postapartheid South Africa. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Bolt, M. (2015). Zimbabwe's migrants and South Africa's border farms: The roots of impermanence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Budlender, D. (2010). Decent work for domestic workers [Study prepared for the SERVICES Sector Education and Training Authority]. Johannesburg, SA: Community Agency for Social Enquiry (CASE).
Burawoy, M. (1976). The functions and reproduction of migrant labour: Comparative material from Southern Africa and the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 81(5), 1050-1087.
Bystrom, K., & Nuttall, S. (2013). Introduction: Private lives and public cultures in South Africa. Journal of Cultural Studies, 27(3), 307-332.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299.
Duffy, M. (2011). Making care count: A century of gender, race, and paid care work. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Gaitskell, D., Kimble, J., Maconachie, M., & Unterhalter, E. (1983). Class, race and gender: Domestic workers in South Africa. Review of African Political Economy, 10(27-28), 86-108.
Glenn, E. N. (1992). From servitude to service work: Historical continuities in the racial division of paid reproductive labor. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society, 18(1), 1-43.
Goldring, L., & Landolt, P. (2011). Caught in the work–citizenship matrix: The lasting effects of precarious legal status on work for Toronto immigrants. Globalizations, 8(3), 325-341. Griffin, L. (2011). Unravelling rights:‘Illegal’ migrant domestic workers in South Africa. South African Review of Sociology, 42(2), 83-101.
Hopstock, N., & de Jager, N. (2011). Locals only: Understanding xenophobia in South Africa. Strategic Review for Southern Africa, 33(1), p120-139.
International Labour Organization. (2015). Global estimates of migrant workers and migrant domestic workers: Results and methodology. Geneva, CH: International Labour Organization (ILO).
Jinnah, Z. (2017). Silence and invisibility: Exploring labour strategies of Zimbabwean farmworkers in Musina, South Africa. South African Review of Sociology, 48(3), 46-63.
Jørgensen, M. B., & Schierup, C. U. (Eds.) (2016). Politics of precarity: Migrant conditions, struggles and experiences. Leiden, NL: Brill.
Kiwanuka, M., Jinnah, Z., & Hartman-Pickerill, B. (2015). Getting the house in order: Foreign migrant workers in the domestic work sector in South Africa [MiWORC Report (10)]. Johannesburg, SA: MiWORC.
Kofman, E., & Raghuram, P. (2012). Women, migration, and care: Explorations of diversity and dynamism in the Global South. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 9(3), 408-432.
Landau, L. B. (2010). Loving the alien? Citizenship, law, and the future in South Africa’s demonic society. African Affairs, 109(435), 213-230.
Landau, L. B. (2018). Friendship fears and communities of convenience in Africa’s urban estuaries: Connection as measure of urban condition. Urban Studies, 55(3), 505-521.
Millar, K. M. (2017). Toward a critical politics of precarity. Sociology Compass, 11(6), 1-11.
Moodie, T. D., & Ndatshe, V. (1994). Going for gold: Men, mines, and migration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Munck, R. (2013). The precariat: A view from the south. Third World Quarterly, 34(5), 747-762.
National Institute of Mental Health. (1990). Clinical training in serious mental illness [DHHS Publication No. ADM 90-1679]. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Neilson, B., & Rossiter, N. (2008). Precarity as a political concept, or, Fordism as exception. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7-8), 51-72.
Nshimbi, C. C., & Fioramonti, L. (2014). The will to integrate: South Africa's responses to regional migration from the SADC Region. African Development Review, 26(S1), 52-63.
Pang, I. (2018). The legal construction of precarity: Lessons from the construction sectors in Beijing and Delhi. Critical Sociology, 45(4-5), 549-564.
Paret, M. (2016). Politics of solidarity and agency in an age of precarity. Global Labour Journal, 7(2), 174-188.
Parreñas, R. S. (2000). Migrant Filipina domestic workers and the international division of reproductive labour. Gender & Society, 4(4), 560-580.
Hann, C., & Parry, J. (Eds.). (2018). Industrial labor on the margins of capitalism: Precarity, class, and the neoliberal subject (Vol. 4). New York: Berghahn Books.
Peberdy, S., & Dinat, N. (2005). Migration and domestic workers: Worlds of work, health and mobility in Johannesburg [Migration Policy Series #40]. Southern African Migration Project, Queen's University, ON.
Piper, N. (2005). Gender and migration [Paper prepared for the Policy Analysis and Research Programme of the Global Commission on International Migration]. Geneva, CH: International Organization on Migration (IOM). Retrieved from http://incedes.org.gt/Master/pipersesentacuatro.pdf
Polzer, T., & Segatti, A. (2012). From the defense of migrants' rights to new political subjectivities: Gauteng migrants' organisations after the May 2008 crisis. In L. B. Landau (Ed.), Exorcising the demons within: Xenophobia, violence and statecraft in contemporary South Africa (pp. 200-225). Johannesburg, SA: Wits University Press.
Rogan, M., Roever, S., Chen, M., & Carré, F. (2017). Informal employment in the Global South: Globalization, production relations, and ‘precarity.’ In A. Kalleberg & S. Vallas (Eds.), Precarious work (pp. 307-333). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
Sassen, S. (2000). Women's burden: Counter-geographies of globalization and the feminization of survival. Journal of International Affairs, 53(2), 503-524.
Schierup, C. U., Munck, R., Likic-Brboric, B., & Neergaard, A. (Eds.). (2015). Migration, precarity, and global governance: Challenges and opportunities for labour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scully, B. (2012). The decline of work or the decline of workers? A review of Franco Barchiesi's precarious liberation. South African Review of Sociology, 43(1), 92-97.
Scully, B. (2016). Precarity north and south: A southern critique of Guy Standing. Global Labour Journal, 7(2), 160-173.
Standing, G. (2011), The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic Press.
Standing, G. (2012). The precariat: From denizens to citizens? Polity, 44(4), 588-608.
Standing, G. (2014). Understanding the precariat through labour and work. Development & Change, 45(5), 963-980.
Stasiulis, D., & Bakan, A. (2005). Negotiating citizenship: Migrant women in Canada and the global system. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
Statistics South Africa. (2012a). Quarterly labour force survey, third quarter. Pretoria, SA: Statistics South Africa.
Statistics South Africa. (2012b). Census 2011 metadata [Report no. 03-01-47 144]. Pretoria, SA: Statistics South Africa.
Statistics South Africa. (2013). General household survey of 2012. Pretoria, SA: Statistics South Africa.
Waite, L. (2009). A place and space for a critical geography of precarity? Geography Compass, 3(1), 412-433.
Wolpe, H. (1972). Capitalism and cheap labour-power in South Africa: From segregation to apartheid. Economy & Society, 1(4), 425-456.
Yeates, N. (2009). Globalizing care economies and migrant workers: Explorations in global care chains. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles are published in Studies in Social Justice under the Creative Commons "Attribution/Non-Commercial/No Derivative Works" Canada licence.
The copyright for the articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles may be used, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. The submission of a manuscript to Studies in Social Justice will be taken to mean that the author understands and agrees to the following:
- the manuscript represents original work not previously published;
- the manuscript is not being considered elsewhere for publication in the same language (publication elsewhere in an alternate language does not preclude acceptance of submission to Studies in Social Justice);
- appropriate written copyright permissions have been secured for republication of any copyrighted material contained in the manuscript;
- copyright for this article is retained by the author, with first publication rights granted to Studies in Social Justice;
- by virtue of its appearance in this open access journal, it is understood that the article is freely available for use, with proper attribution, for educational and other non-commercial purposes;
- reuse of the article for commercial purposes by anyone other than the author requires permission of the author;
- the author agrees to cite Studies in Social Justice as a source whenever h/she later republishes or reuses the article in other platforms.
