Analysis of Vision and Mission Dimensions Benchmark Standards Management of Catholic Education Against Improving School Quality

Dionisius Sihombing, Kisno Kisno

Abstract


The results will be used as a basis for reflection when creating the most recent education management policies, which will support efforts to preserve education through high-quality management of education. In accordance with the guidelines set forth by the Education Commission of the Indonesian Bishops' Conference, four benchmark standards from 13 Catholic education standards and benchmarks and four assessment dimensions are taken into consideration when determining the vision and mission dimensions. This kind of study is known as explanatory study. With a research population of 77 school units, data was gathered using a qualitative and quantitative approach. Five respondents from each of the school representatives made up the total of 385 respondents, which included principals, teachers, and staff members as well as eight supporting respondents who were parish priests, student parents, alumni, and alumni parents, as well as education observers. The study's findings showed that the benchmark standards' influence on raising school quality in the vision and mission domains of education management was 2.29, or in the good category (B). This indicates that the people who designed and implemented school instruction paid close attention to the original idea of using Catholic schools to spread Christian principles across the church. The school has done a good job of preserving its identity as a Christian school. To achieve the goal of becoming a top-notch institution, however, changes must be made to maximize this initial orientation.


Keywords


Benchmark standards, dimensions, vision and mission, management, Catholic schools

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anshori, M., Suwarno, S., & Kasbani, K. (2022). Management of Facilities and Infrastructure in Improving The Quality of Islamic Education. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(3), 928–939. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v5i3.2339

Bellibaş, M. Ş., Polatcan, M., & Kılınç, A. Ç. (2022). Linking instructional leadership to teacher practices: The mediating effect of shared practice and agency in learning effectiveness. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(5), 812–831.

Darujati, C., Ambarwati, A., Damastuti, N., Setiawan, E., & Widodo, A. (2022). Peran Tenaga Kependidikan dalam Pengelolaan Penerapan MBKM di Universitas Narotama. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.5.1.2022.1551

Fasha, S. A., & Umar, A. B. (2021). Administrasi Pendidikan di SMP Annihayah Rawamerta. PeTeKa, 4(2), 247–256. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/ptk.v4i2.247-256

Fathurrochman, I., Danim, S., AB, S. A., Kurniah, N., Connie, C., Wachidi, W., & Ristianti, D. H. (2021). Analisis Sistem Pendidikan Negara Federasi Rusia Dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang.

Ford, T. G., Lavigne, A. L., Fiegener, A. M., & Si, S. (2020). Understanding District Support for Leader Development and Success in the Accountability Era: A Review of the Literature Using Social-Cognitive Theories of Motivation. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 264–307. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319899723

Habibi, B., Hartinah, S., Rofiqul, U., Syazali, M., Lestari, F., Abdurrahman, A., & Jauhariyah, D. (2019). Factor Determinants of Teacher Professionalism as Development of Student Learning Education at SMK PGRI in Tegal City, Indonesia. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 6(2), 123–132.

Maulana, M. P., & Suryana, S. (2021). Upaya Tenaga Administrasi Pendidikan Dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Layanan Administrasi Di Sekolah. PeTeKa, 4(2), 266–274. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/ptk.v4i2.266-274

Mayasari, N., Jusriati, J., Prayogo, P., Hajeni, H., Yati, Y., Ulpi, W., Saswati, R., Satar, M., & Pajarianto, H. (2023). Manajemen Pendidikan. Penerbit Widina.

Megasari, R. (2020). Peningkatan pengelolaan sarana dan prasarana pendidikan untuk meningkatan kualitas pembelajaran di SMPN 5 Bukittinggi. Jurnal Bahana Manajemen Pendidikan, 2(1), 636–648. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/bmp.v2i1.3808

Mwesiga, A., & Okendo, E. O. (2018). Effectiveness of Heads of Schools in Supervising Teachers’ Teaching Activities in Secondary Schools in Kagera Region, Tanzania. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM), 6(04), 3390. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v6i4.sh04

Nurochmah, A., Sutisnawati, A., & Wardana, A. E. (2019). Pengelolaan Satuan Pendidikan dalam Rangka Mencetak Insan Generasi Muda yang Unggul di Sekolah Dasar. Holistika: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD, 3(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24853/holistika.3.2.73-80

Osman, M. E. (2020). Global impact of COVID-19 on education systems: the emergency remote teaching at Sultan Qaboos University. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 463–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1802583

Owan, V. J., & Agunwa, J. N. (2019). Principals’ Administrative Competence and Teachers’ Work Performance in Secondary Schools in Calabar Education Zone of Cross River State, Nigeria. Online Submission, 7(1), 20–28.

Pandi, A. (2022). Peran tenaga administrasi dalam meningkatkan mutu layanan administrasi di MTs. Hidayatul Muhsinin. Mudir: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(1), 153–165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55352/mudir.v4i1.137

Sakdiah, H., & Syahrani, S. (2022). Pengembangan Standar Isi dan Standar Proses Dalam Pendidikan Guna Meningkatkan Mutu Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Cross-Border, 5(1), 622–632.

Sarpiah, S., Assidiq, M., & Khairat, U. (2020). Sistem Informasi Penerimaan Peserta Didik Kesetaraan Paket A,B, dan C Pada Satuan Pendidikan Non Formal Sanggar Kegiatan Belajar Kabupaten Majene Berbasis Web. Journal Peqguruang: Conference Series, 2(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.35329/jp.v2i1.1380

Satrio, S., Hasibuan, L., Us, K. A., & Rizki, A. F. (2021). Administrasi Kurikulum, Kesiswaan, Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan dalam Tinjauan Administasi Sekolah. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Educational Management, 4(2), 92–101.

Sridana, N., Wilian, S., & Setiadi, D. (2018). Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal Di Satuan Pendidikan Menengah (SMA). Jurnal Pengabdian Magister Pendidikan IPA, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/jpmpi.v1i1.212

Suardipa, I. P., & Pitriani, K. (2020). Urgensi Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Dan Akreditasi Dalam Pemetaan Mutu Satuan Pendidikan. PINTU: Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 1(2).

Tanjung, R., Supriani, Y., Mayasari, A., & Arifudin, O. (2022). MANAJEMEN MUTU DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN PENDIDIKAN. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN GLASSER, 6(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.32529/glasser.v6i1.1481

Taufik, T., & Warsono, H. (2020). BIROKRASI BARU UNTUK NEW NORMAL: TINJAUAN MODEL PERUBAHAN BIROKRASI DALAM PELAYANAN PUBLIK DI ERA COVID-19. Dialogue : Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14710/dialogue.v2i1.8182

Wahyudin, U. R. (2020). Manajemen Pendidikan (Teori Dan Praktik Dalam Penyelenggaraan Sistem Pendidikan Nasional). Deepublish.

Yasin, I. (2021). Problem Kultural Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan di Indonesia: Perspektif Total Quality Management. Ainara Journal (Jurnal Penelitian Dan PKM Bidang Ilmu Pendidikan), 2(3), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.54371/ainj.v2i3.87




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v11i1.3680

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
JURNAL PENDIDIKAN EDUTAMA(JPE) by http://ejurnal.ikippgribojonegoro.ac.id/index.php/JPE/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

View My Stats