WHY DID PEOPLE ARGUE ON TWITTER? SCRUTINIZING ARGUMENTATION STRATEGIES USED IN THE TWEETS OF #InternationalWomensDay

Nur Alfiana Isnaini

Abstract

The phenomenon reflected in the tweets used in #InternationalWomensDay as the campaign has provided many people to argue freely on social media platform. Giving an argumentation will conceal the hidden problems spread in the society. Several public problems will be left without any attention. Therefore, this study aims to scrutinize argumentation strategies used by Twitter users in tweets using the #InternationalWomensDay using the Critical Discourse Analysis approach. This present research employs argumentation strategies theory proposed by Teun A. Van Dijk (2000) as well. The data were collected from the tweets using #InternationalWomensDay. In addition, the descriptions of the data were displayed qualitatively. Overall, the results reveal that from the data analysis, the number game strategies became the most frequently used strategy in tweets using the #InternationalWomensDay and the fewest strategy used in this hashtag was pseudo-ignorance. In summary, every tweet made on Twitter using a particular hashtag tends to have a certain purpose.

Keywords

Argumentation strategies; Twitter; InternationalWomensDay; Critical Discourse Analaysis

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abuzahra, N., & Salahat, R. (2018). Analyzing Iago’s speech in shakespeare’s othello. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 185-203.

Aeschbach, M., & Lueddeckens, D. (2019). Religion on Twitter: Communalization in event-based hashtag discourses. Online Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet, 14, 108-130.

Al-Rawi, A., Grepin, K., Li, X., Morgan, R., Wenham, C., & Smith, J. (2021). Investigating public discourses around gender and COVID-19: a social media analysis of Twitter data. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, 5(3), 249-269.

Aini, I. Q. (2019). Discursive strategies on “Boyolali Faces” issue by the Jakarta Post online mass media (Undergraduate Thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang).

Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2011). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. In Proceedings of the 6th European consortium for political research (ECPR) general conference 2011 (pp. 1-9). The European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR).

Eckert, P. (2013). Ethics in linguistic research. Research methods in linguistics, 11-26.

Ehrlich, S., & Romaniuk, T. (2014). 21 Discourse analysis. Research methods in linguistics, 460.

Goswami, M. P. (2018). Social media and hashtag activism. Liberty Dignity and Change in Journalism, 2017.

Indah, R. N., & Khoirunnisa, A. (2018). Argumentative statements in the 2016 presidential debates of the US: A critical discourse analysis. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 4(2), 155-174.

Irham, I., & Wahyudi, R. (2012). Treating disclaimer as a power strategy of self-legitimation and other-de-legitimation in Netanyahu’s UNGA speech. Language, Discourse & Society, 1(2), 89-106.

Konnelly, A. (2015). # Activism: Identity, affiliation, and political discourse-making on Twitter. The Arbutus Review, 6(1), 1-16.

Kusumaningrum, Y. F. (2014). Analisis Kritis Teks Pidato Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono Terkait Kenaikan Bbm Tahun 2012-2013 (Master Thesis, Diponegoro University).

Pond, P., & Lewis, J. (2019). Riots and Twitter: connective politics, social media and framing discourses in the digital public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 22(2), 213-231.

Rahardjo, M. (2010). Triangulasi dalam penelitian kualitatif. Repository.uin-malang.ac.id

Rahardjo, M. (2018). Studi Teks dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. Repository.uin-malang.ac.id

Rose, H., McKinley, J., & Baffoe-Djan, J. B. (2019). Data collection research methods in applied linguistics. Bloomsbury Academic.

Scott, K. (2022). Pragmatics online. Routledge.

Syadlili, M. I. A. (2021). Public opinions in# justiceforcaseygoodson on Twitter: Critical discourse analysis (Undergraduate Thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim).

Van Dijk, T. A. (2000). Ideology and discourse: A multidisciplinary introduction. Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, 1025-1034.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & society, 4(2), 249-283.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/prasasti.v8i2.65153

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.