The formulation and generation of terms for phonetics and phonology in the Classical Arabic linguistic treatises
Abstract
This study seeks to uncover the theoretical bases for the production of the classical Arabic phonetic terms and their elements in the means of generating terms for both lexical semantics and conceptual semantics. The research problem is concerned with examining the roots of generating these phonetic terms and determining the categories of their elements in order to inspect the development of the generation of the terms and investigating the relationship between the specific lexical meanings and their change to figurative meanings. The study is based on the content analysis in terms of classifying the elements and analysing the roots of the qualitative data at the level of the features of the generation of terms' procedures. The findings indicate that the classical phonetic terms were subject to the parameters of the morphological derivation and based on three categories ranging from simple, to complex and compound, in addition to the change of the lexical meanings of the terms to figurative meanings. The study suggests linking the elements and methods of generating these phonetic terms with their partial and detailed definitions in these treatises. This is due to the interest of the ancient phoneticians in the explanation of the concepts more than the formulation of the terms.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abd Al-ǦalÄ«l, A. (1997). Al-ᵓaá¹£wÄt al-luÄ¡awiyyah. Amman: DÄrá¹¢afÄᵓ.
Al-FarÄhÄ«dÄ«, A. (2003). KitÄb al-ᶜayn. HindÄwÄ«, ᶜ. (Ed.). Beirut: DÄr Al-kutub Al-ᶜilmiyyah.
Al-MurÄdÄ«, I. (1987). Al-mufÄ«dfÄ«Å¡arḥ ᶜumdat al-maǧīd. Al-BawwÄb,. ᶜ. (Ed.). ZarqÄ Maktabat Al-manÄr.
Al-Rumḥī, H. (2004). Al-baḥṯ aá¹£-á¹£awti ᶜinda Al-FarrÄᵓ fÄ«maᶜÄnÄ«al-QurᵓÄn. Master’s thesis, The University of Jordan.
Al-ᵓAndalusÄ«, A. (1998). ᵓirtiÅ¡Äf aá¸-á¸arab. Muḥammad, R. (Ed.). Beirut:DÄrAl-fikr Al-LubnÄni.
Al-ᶜubaydÄ«, R. (2007). Muᶜǧam aá¹£-á¹£awtiyyÄt. Silsilat Al-dirÄsÄt Al-IslÄmÄ«yyahAl-muᶜÄá¹£irah, Vol 22. Baghdad: MarkÄz ᵓalbuḥut wa Ad-dirasÄt Al-ᵓislamyah.
As-SÄmarrÄᵓī, ᵓ. (2011). Al-muá¹£á¹alaḥÄt aá¹£-á¹£awtiyyah bayna al-qudamÄᵓ wa al-muḥdaṯīn. Amman: DÄrǦarÄ«r.
As-SakkÄkÄ«, Y. (1987). MuftÄḥ al-ᶜulÅ«m. ZarzÅ«r, N. (Ed.).Beirut: DÄr Al-kutub Al-ᶜilmiyyah.
As-SÄ«rÄfÄ«, A. (2008). Å¡arḥ KitÄb Sibawayh. MahdalÄ«, ᵓ & ᶜAli, ᶜ. (Eds.). Beirut: DÄr Al-kutub Al-ᶜilmiyyah.
Aá¹£-á¹¢iyaÄ¡, ᶜ. (2000). Al-muá¹£á¹alaḥ aá¹£-á¹£awti fi ad-dirÄsÄt al-ᶜarabiyyah. Damascus: DÄr Al-fikr.
As-SiyÅ«á¹Ä«, Ǧ. (2001). Hamᶜ al-hawÄmiᶜ.Makram, A. (Ed.). Kuwait: Institute for Scientific Research.
Az-ZabÄ«dÄ«, M. (2001). TÄǧ al-ᶜarÅ«s min ǧawÄhir al-qÄmÅ«s. ḤiǧÄzÄ«, M. (Ed.). Kuwait: National Council for Culture, Arts and Letters.
Az-ZaǧǧÄǧī, A. (1988). Al-ǧumal fÄ« an-naḥw. Al-ḥamad, ᶜ. (Ed.). Beirut: Al-Resalah Publishing House.
BÅ«rÅ«bah, A. (2006). ᵓaṯarmuá¹£á¹alaḥÄt Al-KhalÄ«l aá¹£-á¹£awtiyyah wa manhaǧuhfÄ«dirÄsÄtmuᶜÄá¹£irÄ«h. Al-ᵓaṯar- Maǧalat al-ᵓÄdÄb wa Al-luÄ¡Ät. 5(5), pp. 23-35.
DarqÄwÄ«, M. (2016). ṬarÄᵓiqtaᶜr:bal-muá¹£á¹alaḥ wa á¹£inÄᶜatat-taᶜrÄ«ffÄ« ad-dars al-lisÄnÄ« al-ᶜarabiy al-ḥadīṯ. Beirut: DÄr Al-kutub Al-ᶜilmiyyah.
ḤiǧÄzÄ«, M. (2018). Al-ᵓusus al-luÄ¡awiyyahliᶜilm al-muá¹£á¹alaḥ. Cairo: DÄrÄ¡arÄ«b.
Ibn As-SarrÄǧ, A. (1996). Al-ᵓuṣūlfÄ« an-naḥw. (3rd ed.). Al-FatlÄ«, A. (Ed.). Beirut: Al-Resalah Publishing House.
Ibn Manẓūr, M. (2003). LisÄn al-ᶜarab. Beirut: DÄrá¹¢Ädir.
Ibn Yaᶜīš, A. (2001). Å¡arḥal-Mufaṣṣal. YaᶜqÅ«b, ᵓ. (Ed.). Beirut: DÄr Al-kutub Al-ᶜilmiyyah.
Ibn Yaᶜīš, A. (2001). Å¡arḥal-Mufaṣṣal. YaᶜqÅ«b, ᵓ. (Ed.). Beirut: DÄr Al-kutub Al-ᶜilmiyyah.
KhÄlidÄ«, H. (2012). á¹¢inÄᶜat al-muá¹£á¹alaḥ aá¹£-á¹£awtÄ«fÄ« al-lisÄn al-ᶜarabÄ« al-ḥadīṯ. Beirut: DÄr Al-kutub Al-ᶜilmiyyah.
Sibawayh, A. (2015). KitÄb Sibawayh. Al-BakkÄ, M. (Ed.). Beirut: Zein Legal Publications.
Troupeau, G. (1982). Naʃᵓat an-naħw al-ᶜarabÄ«fÄ«á¸awᵓ kita:b Sibawayh. The Journal of Jordan Academy of Arabic. 1(1), pp. 125-138.
ZawÄqirÄ«, ᶜ. (2017). Al-muá¹£á¹alaḥ aá¹£-á¹£awtÄ« bayna at-turÄṯ wa at-taǧdÄ«d. Ph.D. thesis, University of Batna.
ᶜUṯmÄn, R. (2010). Al-muá¹£á¹alaḥ an-naḥwÄ« wa ᵓaá¹£al ad-dalÄlah. Beirut: DÄr Al-kutub Al-ᶜIlmiyyah.
2 Non-Arabic references
Alwin, D.F. & McCammon, R.J. (2007). Rethinking generations. Research in Human Development, 4(3-4), pp.219-237.
Bauer, L. (2003). Introducing linguistic morphology. (2nd ed.). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Colless, D.H. (1967). An examination of certain concepts in phenetic taxonomy. Systematic Zoology, 16(1), pp. 6-27.
Fleisch, H. (1961). Traité de philologiearabe. vol.1: préliminaires, phonétiquemorphologienominale. Beirut: Imprmerie Catholique.
Gibbs Jr, R.W. (2001). Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language understanding. Metaphor and symbol. 16(3-4), pp. 317-333.
Giora, R. (2002). Literal vs. figurative language: different or equal?. Journal of pragmatics. 34(4), pp. 487-506.
Grondelaers, S. & Geeraerts, D. (2003). Towards a pragmatic model of cognitive onomasiology. In: Cuyckens, H., Dirven, R. and Taylor, J.R. eds. Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 67-92.
Johnson, K. (2011). Acoustic and auditory phonetics. John Wiley & Sons.
Jones, D. (1976). An outline of English phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Karpova, O. & Kartashkova, F. (Eds.). (2009). Lexicography and terminology: a worldwide outlook. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Kilgarriff, A. (2007). Word senses. In: Agirre, E. & Edmonds, P. (Eds.). Word sense disambiguation. Oxford: Springer, pp. 29-46.
Kockaert, H.J. & Steurs, F. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of terminology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Laprie, J.C. (Ed.). (1992). Dependability: basic concepts and terminology. Dependable computing and fault-tolerant systems, Vol 5. Vienna: Springer-Verlag.
Meyer, I., Eck, K. & Skuce, D. (1997). Systematic concept analysis within a knowledge-based approach to terminology. Wright, S.E. and Budin, G. eds. Handbook of Terminology Management: Basic Aspects of Terminology management, Vol 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 98-119.
Murphy, M.L. (2003). Semantic relations and the lexicon: antonymy, synonymy and other paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pinker, S. & Levin, B. (Ed.). (1991). Lexical and conceptual semantics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Plag, I. 2012. Morphological productivity: structural constraints in English derivation. Kortmann, B. and Traugott, E.C. (Eds.). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Ramchand, G. & Svenonius, P. (2002). The lexical syntax and lexical semantics of the verb-particle construction. In: L. Mikkelsen and C. Potts. (Eds.). WCCFL 21 Proceedings, April 2002, Santa Cruz. Massachusetts: Cascadilla Press, pp. 387-400.
Rey, A. (1995). Essays on terminology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sager, J.C. (1990). Practical course in terminology processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Uschold, M. (1998). Knowledge level modelling: concepts and terminology. The knowledge engineering review.13(1), pp. 5-29.
Vallaro, M. (1987). La hamzat bayna bayna secondo i grammatici Arabi. Oriente Moderno. 67(7-12), pp. 215-221.
Versteegh, C.H.M. (1993). Arabic grammar and QurʼÄnic exegesis in early Islam. Leiden: Brill.
Versteegh, C.H.M. (1977). Greek elements in Arabic linguistic thinking, Vol 7. Leiden: Brill.
Wang, Y.D. & Emurian, H.H. (2005). An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements, and implications. Computers in human behavior, 21(1), pp. 105-125.
Watson, J.C. (2002). The phonology and morphology of Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wehr, H. (1979). A dictionary of modern written Arabic. Cowan, J.M. (Ed.). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies