Examination of Classroom Writing Practices in the Context of Process-Based Approach to Teaching Writing

Tuncay Türkben

Abstract


This research was conducted to evaluate the efforts made by Turkish teachers on developing written expression in their classrooms by considering the basic principles of the process-based writing approach and to determine whether the students' written expressions meet the basic principles of the process-based writing approach. In this respect, the method of the research was determined as a case study, a qualitative research design, and the study group consisted of 24 Turkish teachers teaching 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grades and 24 students enrolled in these classrooms. Maximum variation sampling, a purposeful sampling method, was used to form the study group. A semi-structured interview form was used with 24 selected teachers, and the practices of these teachers and the reactions of the students in these classes were observed. A content analysis was completed in analyzing the data obtained from the observation and interview forms. In addition, the texts written by the students participating in the study were analyzed using the planned writing and evaluation scale. According to the findings obtained from the research, it was determined that in-class written expression activities were not carried out in line with the process-oriented writing approach and that the written expression products of the students did not meet the process-based writing criteria.


Keywords


Turkish education; writing education; process-based writing education; in-class writing activities

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahraz, S. (2018). The effect of planned writing method on the unique text creation access of fourth grade primary school students. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Aksaray University Social Sciences Institute, Aksaray.

Aksu, Ö. (2015). Impact of planned writing and assessment model on preperation of performance works of eight class students. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Institute of Education Sciences, Bolu.

Akyol, H. (2014). Turkish teaching methods. Ankara: Pegem Academy.

Albertson, L. R., & Billingsley, F. F. (2000). Using strategy instruction and self-regulation to improve gifted students' creative writing. Journal of Advanced Academics, 12 (2), 90-101.

Alkan, Z. N. (2007). 5th grade students' writing mistakes in Turkish public schools. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Institute of Social Science, EskiÅŸehir.

Altuner, G. Åž. (2017). The impact of 6 + 1 analytical writing and evaluation model on written expression skills and self-efficacy and writing anxiety in primary school teacher students. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Education Sciences, Ankara.

Arı, G. (2010). Evaluation of the narrative texts of sixth and seventh grades students. Journal of Turkology Research, 27, 43-75.

Arıcı, A.F., & Ungan, S. (2008). An evaluation of secondary school students’ writing mistakes with respect to some points. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, 20, 317-328.

Arıcı, A. F., & Kaldirim, A. (2015). The effect of the process-based writing approach on writing success and anxiety of pre-service teachers. Anthropologist, 22, 318-327.

Aşıkcan, M., & Pilten, G. (2016). The evaluation of classroom teachers’ written expression implementations in terms of process based writing model. Turkish Studies, 11(3), 255-276.

Aydın, İ. S. (2019). Planning of writing. In N. Bayat (Ed.), Writing and education (pp.91-114). Ankara: Ani Publishing.

Bahşi, N., & Sis, N. (2019). The writing levels of middle school students and their problems. Millî Eğitim, 48(224), 181-211.

Bağcı, H. (2010). Levels of Turkish language teacher candidates’ efficiency of written expression. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 11(2), 45-68.

Balcı, O. (2017). Affect of 4+1 planned writing and evaluation model on the development of writing skills and written expression attidudes of sixth grade student. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Institute of Education Sciences, Bolu.

Bayat, N. (2014). The effect of the process writing approach on writing success and anxiety. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(3), 1133-1141, DOI: 10.12738/estp.2014.3.1720

Benjamin, A. (2005). Writing in the content areas. New York: Eye On Education.

Büyükikiz, K. K. (2007). Determination of the written expression skills of primary school 8th class students from the point of view syntax and bad expression. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Education Sciences, Ankara.

Canady, C. E. (2008). Effects of models, writing frames, and sentence combining on second grade writing quality. Doctoral of dissertation, University of Virginia.

Cavkaytar, S. (2010). Benefitting from writing process method to improve written expression skills in primary education. The Journal of International Social Research, 3(10), 133-139.

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Qualitative research methods (Translation Editors: M. Bütün and S. B. Demir). Ankara: Siyasal Publication.

Coşkun, E. (2014). Writing education. In A. Kırkkılıç & H. Akyol, (Editors), Teaching Turkish in Primary Education (4th edition) (pp.49-91). Ankara: Pegem Academy.

Çakır, G. Ş. (2017). The impact of 6 + 1 analytical writing and evaluation model on written expression skills and self-efficacy and writing anxiety in primary school teacher students.

Çetinkaya, G. (2014). Review and correction. In N. Bayat (Ed.), Writing and education (pp.135-158). Ankara: Ani Publishing.

Demir, T. (2013). Realization of gains related to writing skills in the secondary school. Research in Reading & Writing Instruction, 1(1), 45-56.

Demirel, Ö., & Şahinel, M. (2006). Turkish teaching. Ankara: Pegem Academy.

Derman, S. (2020). Evaluation of written expression skills of experiment type of students in different teaching levels. OPUS–International Journal of Society Researches, 15(26), 4265-4292. DOI:10.26466/opus.733517

Dilidüzgün, Ş. (2013). The effect of process writing activities on the writing skills of prospective Turkish teachers. Eurasion Journal of Educational Research,52, 189-210.

Doğan, Y. (2020). “Preparation†as a dimension of process-based writing approach. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 8(2), 326-342.

Duman, B. (2004). Learning-Teaching Theories and Process Based Education. Ankara: Ani Publishing.

Ekinci Çelikpazu, E. (2006). A study on 6th grade primary students writing skills in Erzurum city centre. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Atatürk University Institute of Social Science, Erzurum.

Elma, C., & Bütün, E. (2015). Teachers opinions about primary and secondary school students writing skills. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Education Faculty, 15 (2), 104-131.

Erbilen, M. (2014). Evaluation of secondary school 8th grade students' planning skills in written expressions. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Mustafa Kemal University Institute of Social Science, Hatay.

Erdoğan, Ö. (2012). The effects of process based creative writing activities on students? writing expression and attitude towards writing. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Hacettepe Univertsity Social Sciences Institute, Ankara.

Erdoğan, Ö., & Yangın, B. (2014). The effects of process based creative writing activities on students’ writing expression and attitude towards writing. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Education of Faculty, 14(1), 438-459.

Evans, J. (2001). Introduction: learning and teaching the complexities of writing. In Janet Evans (Ed.), Writing in the Elementary Classroom: A Reconsideration. Portsmout, NH: Heinemann.

Faigley, L. & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32, 400-410.

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. doi:10.2307/356600.

García, J. N., & Fidalgo, R. (2008). Orchestration of writing processes and writing products: A comparison of sixth-grade students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities, 6 (2), 77-98.

Göçer, A. (2010). Writing education in Turkish teaching. The Journal of International Social Research, 3(12), 178-195.

Görgüç, Ç. (2016). The effect of analitical writing and evaluation on writing attitude and achievement of the 6th graders. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Dokuz Eylül University Graduate School of Educational Sciences, İzmir.

Güfta, H., & Özçakmak, H. (2013). Evaluation of the writing activities in the primary school 6th- 8th Turkish course books according to the teacher views. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 10(21), 125-144.

Güleryüz, H. (2000). Türkçe Programlanmış İlk Okuma Yazma Öğretimi [Turkish Programmed First Reading and Writing Instruction]. Ankara: PegemA Publishing.

Güneş, F. (2017). Activity approach in Turkish teaching. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 5(1), 48-64

Güneyli, A. (2016). Analyzing writing anxiety level of Turkish Cypriot students. Education and Science, 41(183), 163-180.

Kaldırım, A. (2014). The effect of 6+1 analytical writing and evaluation model on the sixth grade students' writing expression skills. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Kütahya Dumlupınar University Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Kütahya.

KaradaÄŸ, R. & Kayabaşı, B. (2013). “Why don’t we write?â€: Prospective elementary teachers’ opinions regarding writing obstacles (Sample of Adiyaman University), Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty (EUJEF), 15(1), 1-32.

Karadağ, R. (2016). Writing education. In F. Susar Kırmızı (Ed.), Turkish education in primary and secondary schools (pp.163-210). Ankara: Anı Publishing.

Karatay, H. (2013). Process-based writing models: 4 + 1 planned writing and evaluation model. In M. Özbay (Ed.), Writing Education (2nd Edition) (pp. 21–43). Ankara: Pegem Academy.

Karatay, H. (2011). The effect of 4 + 1 planned writing and evaluation model to develop the attitudes of preservice teachers as to written expression and their writing skills. Turkish Studies, 6(3), 1029-1047.

Karatosun, S. (2014). The effect of planned writing and evaluation model on enhancing 5th grade students' composition writing skills. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Mustafa Kemal University Social Sciences Institute, Hatay.

Kaynaş, E., & Anılan, H. (2015). Narrative text writing skills assessment of fifth grade students. Dicle University Journal of Ziya Gökalp Education Faculty, 26, 121-147.

Keçik İ. & Uzun L., (2004). Oral and Written Expression in Turkish. Eskişehir. Anadolu University Publications.

Kırbaş, A. (2010). Investigation of eighth grade students' written expression skills (according to the school variable). Atatürk University Journal of Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty, 0 (18), 72-93.

Köksal, K. (1999). Okuma yazmanın öğretimi [Teaching Reading and Writing]. Ankara: PegemA Publishing.

Kurt, A. (2019). Contribution of process based writing approach in developing students' writing acquasition and skills in Turkish education. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Erciyes University Institute of Education Sciences, Kayseri.

Kurudayıoğlu, M. & Karadağ, Ö. (2010). Examining the written expressions of primary school graders as regard to their choıce of topıcs. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 7(13), 192-207.

Maltepe, S. (2006). Evaluation of writing processes and products in Turkish courses based on creative writing approach. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Ankara Univertsity Social Sciences Institute, Ankara.

Olinghouse, N. G., & Santangelo, T. (2010). Assessing the writing of struggling learners. Focus On Exceptional Children, 43 (4), 1-27.

Oral, G. (2008). We are writing again (3rd Edition). Ankara: Pegem A Academy.

Özdemir, B. (2014). The effect of analytical writing and assessment method on pre-service Turkish teachers' writing skills and attitudes towards writing. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Gazi Univertsity Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Ankara.

Özkara, Y. (2007). The Effect of 6+1 analytic writing and evaluatine model on enhancing 5th grade students’ narrative writing skills. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Gazi Univertsity Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Ankara.

Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in Teaching Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Richards, J. C. (2000). Language Teaching. Matrix, N.Y.: CUP.

Rohman, D. G. (1965). Pre-writing the stage of discovery in the writing process. College Composition and Communication, 16(2), 106-12.

Rosenblum, S., Weiss, P. L., & Parush, S. (2003). Product and process evaluation of handwriting difficulties. Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 41–81. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021371425220

Rubin, N., & Henderson, S. E. (1982). Two Sides of the Same Coin: Variations in Teaching Methods and Failure Learn to Write (Special Edition). Forward Trends.

SallabaÅŸ, M. E. (2007). Primary school 5th students' acquisition level of expressing themselves in written language. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Gazi University Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Ankara.

Sever, E. (2013). The effect of processed writing models at the 4th level of primary school students on their writing and creative writing. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Bülent Ecevit Univertsity Institute of Social Sciences, Zonguldak.

Sezgin, N. (2016). Analysis of the effect of process-based writing education on the student's writing skill who has mild mental deficiency. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University Institute of Educational Sciences, Trabzon.

Tabak, G., & Göçer, A. (2013). Evaluating the writing skill of sixth and eighth grade Turkish language teaching curriculum in terms of product and process approaches. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 14(2), 147-169.

Tavşanlı, Ö.F. (2017). Evaluation of the instructional program in Turkey based on the process-based writing approach. International Journal of Language Academy,5(2), 79-97. DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/10.18033/ijla.3551

Tavşanlı, Ö. F., & Kaldırım, A. (2020). Process based writing approach in Turkey: A thematic analysis study. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 9(1), 108-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.30703/cije.543600

Tekşan, K. (2001). The effect of preliminary preparation on writing skills development. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Social Sciences Institute, Çanakkale.

Temizkan, M., & Erdevir, M. (2019). Substructure of thought in the written texts of students in secondary schools. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 16(43), 18-45.

Temizkan, M., & Erbilen, M. (2020). Evaluation of opinions and skills of 8th grade students toward planning in written expression. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 8(2), 469-486.

Tompkins, G. E. (2002). Language Arts. Content and teaching strategies. New Jersey: Prentice- Hall.

Tompkins, G.E. (2005). Language arts: Patterns of practice. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Ãœlper, H. (2008). The effects of teaching writing programme prepared in accordance with cognitive process model on student achievement. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Ankara Univertsity Social Sciences Institute, Ankara.

Tseng, M. H., & Chow, S. M. K. (2000). Perceptual-Motor Function of School Age Children with Slow Handwriting Speed. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 83-88.

Yalçın, A. (2018). Teaching methods of Turkish in the light of recent scientific developments. Ankara: Pegem Academy.

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.

Yılmaz, M. (2012). Importance of plan of writing methot in impove of students’ composition writing abilities in elementary school first grade. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 9(19), 321-330.

Zorbaz, K.Z. (2010). The relationship between middle school student’s writing apprehension and blocking with their written expression skills. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Gazi Univertsity Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Ankara.

Zorbaz, K.Z. (2014). Writing education. In M. Yılmaz (Ed.), In the light of new developments, in Turkish teaching (pp. 109-147). Ankara: Pegem Academy.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies