<b>Analytical solution of an industrial soybean oil extractor mathematical model</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v30i1.3217
Keywords:
solid-liquid extraction, soybean oil, analytical solution, belt extractor
Abstract
This paper presents an analytical solution for a model of the soybean oil extraction using horizontal belt extractors. The partial differential equations of the chosen model describe the mass transfer in the bed, as well as each stage of the extraction process in the belt extractors. The general analytical solution was obtained using a symbolic mathematic package. Results showed that this solution does not satisfy all boundary and initial conditions of the model. A simplification of the analyzed system and the use of some boundary conditions with practical meaning were the basis for obtaining a particular solution of the extraction process in belt extractors. The analytical solutions provide some clear advantages in the comprehension of the behavior of the extractor.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-05-08
How to Cite
Almeida, R. L. de, Módenes, A. N., & Ravagnani, M. A. da S. S. (2008). <b>Analytical solution of an industrial soybean oil extractor mathematical model</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v30i1.3217. Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 30(1), 83-86. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v30i1.3217
Issue
Section
Chemical Engineering
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
Read this link for further information on how to use CC BY 3.0 properly.
0.8
2019CiteScore
36th percentile
Powered by
0.8
2019CiteScore
36th percentile
Powered by