Comparison of Grammar Curriculum Learning Outcomes and Teachers' Views in Terms of the Effect of L1 on L2 Learning

Bahadır Gülden

Abstract


In terms of language teaching, individuals’ ability to master their native language and grammar rules directly affects foreign language acquisition processes. Considering this situation, which is also defined as “interdisciplinary†the background of foreign language learning processes in the context of the native language should be established. The fact that an individual who has not yet learned the rules or concepts in his native language, and therefore does not have schemes in his mind, negatively affect being successful in learning foreign language for the same concept or rules. For this reason, it is necessary to ensure coordination during the acquisition of the target achievements of both disciplines by adopting an interdisciplinary approach in native and foreign language teaching.

In this study, it was tried to determine the grammar objectives that middle school students started to learn in English lesson before they started the learning process in their native language by examining Turkish and English curriculums in terms of grammar acquisitions. The education programs of both disciplines were examined in terms of grammar acquisitions, and the target achievements that were tried to be taught to individuals in the English lesson were determined even though the Turkish language course was not started yet.

Based on the data obtained, recommendations were made depending on the before-after relationship in terms of grammar acquisitions of both programs, and it was aimed to draw attention to a significant deficiency in language teaching and to contribute to drawing a correspondence between the curriculums.


Keywords


Turkish curriculum, English curriculum, grammar, readiness, interdisciplinarity.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aksan, D. (2015). Her Yönüyle Dil Ana Çizgileriyle Dilbilim. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu .

Auerbach, E. R. (1993). Reexamining English Only in the ESL Classroom. TESOL quarterly 27(1), 9-32.

Aytaş, G., & Çeçen, M. A. (2010). Ana Dili Eğitiminde Dil Bilgisi Öğretiminin Yeri ve Önemi. Journal of Turkology Research (17), 77-89.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2019). Eğitimde Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Can, E., & Can, C. I. (2014). Problems Encountered In Second Foreign Language Teaching In Turkey. Trakya University Journal of Education 4(2), 43-63.

Chomsky, N. (2000). Dilin Mimarisi (The Architecture of Language). Istanbul: Boğaziçi Universty Press.

Chomsky, N. (2001). Language and Mind. Ankara: Ayraç.

Dost, E. N. (2017). A Review of Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis with a Phonological and Syntactical view: A Cross-linguistic Study. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research 4(6), 165-173.

Eckman, F. R. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language learning. Language Learning 27(2), 315-330.

Given, L. M. (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage publications.

Gordon, T. (2007). Teaching Young Children a Second Language. Greenwood Publishing Group.

Kecskes, I., & Papp, T. (2000). Foreign Language and Mother Tongue. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. Univ of Michigan Pr.

May (Ed.), T., & Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative Research in Action. Sage.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.

Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2004). Second language learning theories. London: Great Britain.

MONE. (2018a). Turkish Language Teaching Program. Ankara: Republic of Turkey Ministry of Education.

MONE. (2018b). English Language Teaching Program. Ankara: Republic of Turkey Ministry of Education.

Rast, R. (2008). Foreign Language Input Initial Processing. Multilingual Matters.

Ringbom, H. (1987). The Role of the First Language in Foreign Language Learning . Clavedon: Multilingual Matters.

Seggie, F. N., & Bayyurt, Y. (2017). Nitel Araştırma Yöntem, Teknik, Analiz ve Yaklaşımları. Ankara: Anı.

Suna, Y., & Durmuşçelebi, M. (2013). Türkiye’de Yabancı Dil Öğrenme-Öğretme Proble-mine İlişkin Yapılan Çalışmaların Derlemesi. Opus Türkiye Sosyal Politika ve Çalışma Hayatı Araştırmaları Dergisi 3(5), 7-24.

ÅžimÅŸek, M. R. (2010). The Use of L1 in Foreign Language Teaching: When, How Much, Why. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education 6(1), 1-14.

Thorpe (Ed.), R., & Holt (Ed.), R. (2008). The Sage Dictionary of Qualitative Management Research. Sage.

Towell, R., & Hawkins, R. (1994). Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Multilingual Matters.

Vardar, B. (2007). Açıklamalı Dilbilim Terimleri Sözlüğü. İstanbul: Multilingual.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). Düşünce ve Dil. İstanbul: Toplumsal Dönüşüm Yayınları.

Wardhaugh, R. (1970). The Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis. Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages 4(2), 123-130.

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık .


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies