Step-Parent Adoption Gone Wrong: GT v CT [2015] 3 ALL SA 631 (GJ)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2016/v19i0a731

Keywords:

Children, adoption, rescission, best interests of the child, step-parent adoption, parental responsibilities and rights

Abstract

Step-parent adoption happens where a child is adopted by the spouse or civil union partner of a biological parent. This is a drastic invasion into the life of a child because (except if provided for otherwise) an adoption order terminates all parental responsibilities and rights any person had in respect of a child immediately before the adoption, and confers full parental responsibilities and rights in respect of the adopted child upon the adoptive parent. Under specific circumstances an adoption order may also be rescinded, again disrupting the life of the child dramatically. Because of the immense impact on a child, rescission of an adoption order has to be handled with kid gloves.

In Turner v Turner two children had been legally adopted by their step-father while the Child Care Act was in operation. After the implementation of the Children’s Act, however, he applied for these adoption orders to be rescinded. The court was faced with a situation where the application had been brought in contravention of the maximum two-year-period as prescribed by the Children’s Act. Although it was argued that non-compliance with this statutory requirement prevented the court from adjudicating this matter, Mokgoatlheng J focused on the best interests of the child, considered the legality of the adoption orders (why?), and ultimately concluded that the supremacy of the best interests of the child meant that he was not precluded from hearing the application. In the end he ordered rescission of the adoption orders. The judgment cannot be supported.

 

Google_Scholar_12055.png   ScienceOpen_Log034338.png

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Themba Skosana, UNISA

Department of Private Law

Lecturer

Sandra Ferreira, UNISA

Department of Private Law

Associate Professor

References

Bibliography

Literature

Barrie 2013 TSAR

Barrie GN "Giving Due Consideration to Views Expressed by the Child in

Family Law Proceedings: The Australian Experience and Lessons for

South Africa" 2013 TSAR 124-138

Boezaart "General Principles"

Boezaart T "General Principles" in Davel CJ and Skelton AM (eds)

Commentary on the Children's Act (Juta Cape Town 2007 revised 2012)

-1 –2-36

Boezaart 2008 De Jure

Boezaart T "Some Comments on the Interpretation and Application of

Section 17 of the Children's Act 38 of 2005" 2008 De Jure 245-254

Bonthuys 2006 Int J Law Policy Family

Bonthuys E "The Best Interests of Children in the South African

Constitution" 2006 Int J Law Policy Family 23-43

Botha Statutory Interpretation

Botha C Statutory Interpretation:An Introduction for Students 5th ed (Juta

Cape Town 2013)

Davel and De Kock 2001 De Jure

Davel CJ and De Kock P "In 'n Kind se Beste Belang" 2001 De Jure 272-

Du Toit "Legal Representation of Children"

Du Toit C "Legal Representation of Children" in Boezaart T (ed) Child Law

in South Africa (Juta Cape Town 2009) 93-111

Ferreira 2014 THRHR

Ferreira S "The Voice of the Child in Adoption in South Africa" 2014

THRHR 375-386

Ferreira 2015 THRHR

Ferreira S "Step-parent Adoption Centre for Child Lawv Minister of Social

Development 2014 1 SA 468 (GNP)" 2015 THRHR 140-148

Heaton 2010 Ann Surv S African L

Heaton J "Family Law" 2010 Ann Surv S African L 453-459

Heaton "South African Law of Persons"

Heaton J "The South African Law of Persons" 4th ed (LexisNexis Durban

Louw 2010 De Jure

Louw A "Rescission of Adoption Orders" 2010 De Jure 335-336

SALC Review of the Child Care Act

South African Law Commission Review of the Child Care Act: Project 110,

Discussion Paper 103 (The Commission Pretoria 2001)

Skelton "Constitutional and International Protection of children's rights"

Skelton A "Constitutional and International Protection of Children's Rights"

in Boezaart T (ed) Child Law in South Africa (Juta Cape Town 2009) 265-

Sloth-Nielsen 1995 SAJHR

Sloth-Nielsen J "Ratification of the United Nations Convention on the

Rights of the Child: Some Implications for South African Law" 1995

SAJHR 401-420

Sloth-Nielsen 2008 SAJHR

Sloth-Nielsen J "Realising Children's Rights to Legal Representation and

to Be Heard in Judicial Proceedings: An Update" 2008 SAJHR 495-524

Sonnekus 2015 TSAR

Sonnekus JC "Kinderaanneming Dra Gevolge Wat Nie Ligtelik Afgelê Kan

Word Nie" 2015 TSAR 886-903

Williams 1982 U Tor LJ

Williams C "Step-Parent Adoptions and the Best Interests of the Child in

Ontario" 1982 U Tor LJ 214-230

Published

17-05-2017

How to Cite

Skosana, T., & Ferreira, S. (2017). Step-Parent Adoption Gone Wrong: GT v CT [2015] 3 ALL SA 631 (GJ). Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 19, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2016/v19i0a731

Issue

Section

Case Notes

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.