Enabling Innovation in The Philippine Rice Industry: The Roles and Key-Capabilities of Innovation Intermediaries

Kevin Christopher Go

Abstract


The innovation studies literature finds that innovation intermediaries or innovation-enabling organizations perform roles that promote knowledge transfer, organizational development, and network collaboration. Furthermore, these organizations require building necessary key-capabilities that allow them to conduct these roles more successfully. However, a gap remains in understanding how intermediaries perform their roles and develop key-capabilities as global value chains and innovation systems interact, especially in agri-food business industries. This study chooses the Philippine rice industry as a case. It shows how innovation intermediaries in the industry support the upgrading, participation, and innovation of their stakeholders to compete against cheaper rice produced abroad. It provides several policy and management implications for maximizing the role performance and key-capability building of innovation intermediaries in agri-food business industries. This article is part of a more extensive dissertation on how innovation intermediaries in agri-food business industries perform roles and build key-capabilities as their organization types, value chain segment participation, and industry’s market orientation vary.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Asha, V.T. and Raju, M.S. (2019). Marketing and exchange of farm products in Facebook groups: A case study. Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(10), pp. 58-68.

Briones, R.M. (2019). Welfare Impact of Rice Tariffication (PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2019-16). Quezon City, Philippines: Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

Briones, R.M. and dela Peña, B. (2015). Competition Reform in the Philippine Rice Sector (PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2015-04). Quezon City, Philippines: Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

Chunhavuthiyanon, M. and Intarakumnerd, P. (2014). The role of intermediaries in sectoral innovation system: The case of Thailand’s food industry. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 13(1), pp. 15-36.

Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J.W., and Creswell, J. D. (2015). Research Design (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dawe, D.C. (2006). The Philippines imports rice because it is an island nation. In Dawe, D.C., Moya, P.F., and Casiwan, C.B. (Eds.). Why Does the Philippines Import Rice? Meeting the challenge of trade liberalization (pp. 3-8). Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.

De Backer, K. and Miroudot, S. (2013). Mapping global value chains, OECD Trade Policy Papers 159. OECD Publishing, Paris.

Department of Agriculture. (2018). The Philippine Rice Industry Roadmap 2030. Retrieved August 27, 2021, from https://www.philrice.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/The-Philippine-Rice-Industry-Roadmap-2030.pdf.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2021). Rice, paddy area harvested, yield, and production quantity for the Philippines, Thailand, and Viet Nam, 2019 [Data file]. Retrieved November 24, 2021, from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL, updated September 15, 2021.

Fernandez-Stark, K. Bamber, P., and Gereffi. G. (2012). Inclusion of Small- and Medium-sized Producers in High-value Agro-food Value Chains. Center on Globalization, Governance, & Competitiveness, Duke University.

Gereffi, G. and Fernandez-Stark, K. (2018) Global Value Chain Analysis: A Primer Second Edition. In Gereffi, G. (Ed.). Global Value Chains and Development: Redefining the Contours of 21st Century Capitalism (pp. 305-342). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Go, K.C.L. (2019). The role and capabilities of urban-based cooperatives as intermediary organizations: A multiple case-study on university partnerships. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 18(2), pp. 175-195.

Howells, J. (2006), Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), pp. 715-728.

Humphrey, J. and Memedovic, O. (2006). Global Value Chains in the Agrifood Sector (United Nations International Development Organization Working Papers). Vienna, Austria.

Intarakumnerd, P. and Goto, A. (2018). Role of public research institutes in national innovation systems in industrialized countries: The cases of Fraunhofer, NIST, CSIRO, AIST, and ITRI. Research Policy 47(7), pp. 1309-1320.

Intarakumnerd, P., and Chaoroenporn, P. (2013). The role of intermediaries in sectoral innovation system in developing countries: Public organizations versus private organizations. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21(1), pp. 108–119.

Keijser, C., and Iizuka, M. (2018). Looking beyond global value chains in capacity development: The case of IT-enabled service (ITES) sector in South Africa. The European Journal of Development Research 30(3), pp. 442-461.

Kissoly, L. Faße, A., and Grote, U. (2017). The integration of smallholders in agricultural value chain activities and food security: evidence from rural Tanzania. Food Security 9(6), pp. 1219-1235.

Kivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S., and Klerkx, L. (2019). Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: a systemic review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 48(4), pp. 1062-1075.

Klerkx, L., and Leeuwis, C. (2009). Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: Insights from the Dutch agricultural sector. Technological Forescasting & Social Change, 76(6), pp. 849-860.

Lee, J., Gereffi, G., and Barrientos, S. (2011). Global Value Chains, Upgrading and Poverty Reduction (Capturing the Gains: Economic and Social Upgrading Briefing Note 3).

Lee, K., Szapiro, M., and Mao Z. (2018). From Global Value Chains (GVC) to Innovation Systems for Local Value Chains and Knowledge Creation. The European Journal of Development Research, 30(3), pp. 424-441.

Lema, R., Pietrobelli, C., and Rabellotti, R. (2018). Innovation in Global Value Chains (UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series 2018-038).

Lema, R., Rabellotti, R., and Sampath, P.G. (2018). Innovation trajectories in developing countries: Co-evolution of global value chains and innovation systems. The European Journal of Development Research, 30(3), pp. 345-363.

Lindberg, M., Lindgren, M., and Packendorff, J. (2014). Quadruple Helix as a Way to Bridge the Gender Gap in Entrepreneurship: The Case of an Innovation System Project in the Baltic Sea Region. Journal of Knowledge Economy, 5, pp. 94-113.

Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), pp. 247-264.

Mataia, A.B., Beltran, J.C., Manalili, R.G., Catudan, B.M., Francisco, N.M., and Flores, A.C. (2019). Rice Value Chain Analysis in the Philippines. Nueva Ecija, Philippines: Philippine Rice Research Institute.

Moya, P.F., Bordey, F.H., Beltran, J.C., Manalili, R.G., Launio, C.C.,

Mataia, A.B., Litonjua, A.C., and Dawe, D.C. (2016). Costs of rice production. In Bordey, F.H., Moya, P.F., Beltran, J.C., and Dawe, D.C. (Eds.). Competitiveness of Philippine Rice in Asia (pp. 99-118). Nueva Ecija, Philippines: Philippine Rice Research Institute, and Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.

Nadvi, K. and Barrientos, S. (2004). Industrial Clusters and Poverty Reduction: Towards a methodology for poverty and social impact assessment of cluster development initiatives. Vienna, Austria: United Nations Industrial Development Organization.

Narrod, C., Roy, D., Okello, J., Avendaño, B., Rich, K., and Thorat, A. (2009). Public-private partnerships and collective action in high value fruit and vegetable supply chains. Food Policy, 34(1), pp. 8-15.

National Economic and Development Authority. (2017). Philippine Development Plan 2017-2022. Retrieved August 27, 2021, from http://pdp.neda.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/PDP-2017-2022-07-20-2017.pdf.

Otsuka, K. (2000). Role of agricultural research in poverty reduction: lessons from the Asian experience. Food Policy 25(4), pp. 447-462.

Oyejide, T.A., Olawale Ogunkola, E., and Bankole, A.S. (2019). Building and integration of agricultural value chains in Nigeria. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 25(3), pp. 254-268.

Partners, H. (2007). Study of the Role of Intermediaries in Support of Innovation. Canberra, Australia: Department of Industry, Tourism, and Resources.

Philippine Statistics Authority. (2020). Farmers, Fisherfolks, Individuals Residing in Rural Areas and Children Posted the Highest Poverty Incidences Among the Basic Sectors in 2018. Retrieved August 27, 2021, from https://psa.gov.ph/poverty-press-releases/nid/162541.

Philippine Statistics Authority. (2021). Rice and corn: supply utilization accounts by commodity, year and item [Data file]. Retrieved August 27, 2021, from https://openstat.psa.gov.ph/database, updated November 13, 2020.

Pietrobelli, C. and Rabellotti, R. (2011). Global Value Chains Meet Innovation Systems: Are There Learning Opportunities for Developing Countries?. World Development, 39(7), pp. 1261-1269.

Ponte, S., Kelling, I., Jespersen, K.S., and Kruijssen, F. (2014). The blue revolution in Asia: upgrading and governance in aquaculture value chains. World Development, 64(December 2014), pp. 52-64.

Ramirez, M., Clarke, I., and Klerkx, L. (2018). Analysing intermediary organisations and their influence on upgrading in emerging agricultural chains. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(6), pp. 1314-1335.

Ranada, P. (2019, February 15). Duterte signs rice tariffication law. Rappler. Retrieved August 27, 2021, from https://www.rappler.com/nation/duterte-signs-rice-tariffication-law-february-2019.

Republic Act No. 11203. (2018). An act liberalizing the importation, exportation and trading of rice, lifting for the purpose the quantitative import restriction on rice, and for other purposes. Retrieved August 27, 2021, from https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/downloads/2019/02feb/20190214-RA-11203-RRD.pdf.

Republic Act No. 8178. (1996). An act replacing quantitative import restrictions on agricultural products, except rice, with tariffs, creating the agricultural competitiveness enhancement fund, and for other purposes. Retrieved August 27, 2021, from https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1996/03/28/republic-act-no-8178-s-1996/.

Senanyake, S.M.P. and Premaratne, S.P. (2016). An analysis of the paddy/rice value chains in Sri Lanka. Asia-Pacific Journal of Rural Development, 26(1), pp. 105-126.

Sutthijakra, S. and Intarakumnerd, P. (2015). Role and capabilities of intermediaries in university-industry linkages: A case of Hard Disk Drive Industry in Thailand. Science, Technology and Society, 20(2), pp. 182–203.

Teece, D.J. (2019). A capability theory of the firm: an economics and (Strategic) management perspective. New Zealand Economic Papers, 53(1), pp. 1-43.

United Nations Industrial Development Organization. (2011). Pro-Poor Value Chain Development: 25 guiding questions for designing and implementing agroindustry projects. Vienna, Austria: United Nations Industrial Development Organization.

Van Lente, H., Hekkert, M.P., Smits, R., and van Waveren, B. (2003). Roles of systemic intermediaries in transition processes. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), pp. 1-33.

Yin, R.K. (2003). Applications of Case Study Research (2nd Ed.). USA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Yin, R.K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Designs and Methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14203/STIPM.2022.315

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 STI Policy and Management Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright of Journal of STI (Science Technology Innovation) Policy and Management Journal (e-ISSN 2502-5996 p-ISSN 2540-9786). Powered by OJS.