Critiquing American structural racism: a comparative analysis of the cases of Muhammed Ali and Collin Kaepernick
Abstract
In fighting for justice and equality in the face of American institutional racism, Muhammed Ali became an internationally known and respected figure. His 1976 auto-biography, The Greatest, with Richard Dunham and edited by Toni Morrison is a fast paced and well written book. It showcases the intellect, humanity, and determination behind the globally recognized icon. The auto-biography is interesting in the sense that it places boxing on the periphery and instead focuses on Ali’s struggles and disappointments, to be recognized as a man in the American South, which would later morph into the greater struggle for civil rights for American minorities. In fighting against what this research terms ‘structural racism, what emerged was a battle against the very fabric of core norms and culture, which establishes white American hegemony. In taking on established structures, Ali faced the wrath of ‘the Establishment.’ The idea of this term becomes vivid via comparative analysis of other case studies, which reveal that those who question American structural racism are met with similar reactions and consequences for their criticism. This study is thus relevant because it exposes how Ali’s own fight for justice and racial equality 60 years ago is essentially no different than it is today.
Downloads
References
Webster, J., Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the Past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26 (2), 13–23.
Buckley, P. J. (2016). Historical Research Approaches to the Analysis of Internationalisation. Management International Review, 56 (6), 879–900. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-016-0300-0
Carrega, C. (2021). Black Americans are incarcerated at nearly five times the rate of Whites, new report on state prison finds. CNN. Available at: https://edition.cnn.com/2021/10/13/politics/black-latinx-incarcerated-more/index.html
Dyson, M. E. (2008). Commentary: Me and my brother and black America. CNN. Available at: https://edition.cnn.com/2008/US/07/23/bia.michael.dyson/index.html
McCoy, A. (2017). In the Shadows of the American Century: The Rise and Decline of US Global Power. Haymarket Books, 369.
Lawrence, K., Keleher, T. (2004). Structural Racism. Chronic Disparity: Strong and Pervasive Evidence of Racial Inequalities. Race and Public Policy Conference.
Pew Research (2021). Racial Ethnic diversity increases yet again with the 117th Congress.
Pirtle, W. N. (2020). Racial Capitalism: A Fundamental Cause of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic Inequities in the United States. Health Education & Behavior, 47 (4), 504–508. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120922942
Robinson, C. (1983). Black Marxism: The making of the black radical tradition. University of North Carolina Press, 2.
Clarno, A. (2017). Neoliberal apartheid: Palestine/Israel and South Africa after 1994. University of Chicago Press. doi: http://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226430126.001.0001
Johnson W. (Ed.) (2017). Race, capitalism, justice forum 1. Boston Review.
Lovaas, S. (2008). Manufacturing Consent in democratic South Africa: Application of the propaganda model. Johannesburg: University of Witswatersrand, 333.
Parenti, M. (1986). Inventing Reality: The Politics of the Mass Media. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 258.
Herman, E. S., Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media”. Pantheon Books.
Carmichael, J. (2018). Social Control. Oxford Bibliographies.
Zirin, D. (2013). Game Over: How Politics Has Turned the Sports World Upside Down, A People’s History of Sports in the United States. The New Press, 240.
Donahue, B. (2020). How the NFL Responded to the Colin Kaepernick Protests in 2016–2017 and How the League Responded to Athlete Protests During the Black Lives Matter Movement of 2020: A Sport Study, Social Phenomenological Approach. Journal of Sports, 22.
Copyright (c) 2022 Anton M. Pillay, Jeremiah Madzimure
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.