The models of anthropogenic emergencies for decision support systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.201736

Keywords:

emergency, fuzzy situation, expert information, decision support systems

Abstract

This paper addresses the issues related to controlling and preventing anthropogenic emergencies. The early detection of critical conditions, the accuracy, and reliability of monitoring system parameters is the key to the prevention of anthropogenic catastrophes of different levels.

A model of the emergency as a fuzzy situation has been proposed, based on the theory of fuzzy sets and the concept of a linguistic variable; a set of indicators has been determined that fully describe the factors affecting emergency. The set of indicators is a combination of both quantitative and qualitative data. It has been shown that the proposed fuzzy model is consistent with the characteristics and conditions of emergency occurrence at the objects of critical infrastructure and, at the same time, makes it possible to process both quantitative and qualitative indicators. This approach enables using fuzzy relations to form the similarity groups and to build rule bases in the decision support systems taking into consideration the similarity of situations, which improves the effectiveness of decision support systems.

Under extreme conditions, prompt and qualified managerial decision making is the most important task, which is solved, in particular, by the decision support systems. Since the construction of a rule base for an intelligent system requires the participation of experts, this paper has proposed a method for representing and processing expert data, which makes it possible to define the characteristics of their consistency and to choose the appropriate processing method. The proposed approaches to modeling emergencies could make it possible to detect situations in order to control and prevent them and to devise a set of activities in the case of an emergency, which would save human life and natural resources

Author Biographies

Vadim Yakovenko, University of Customs and Finance Vernadskoho str., 2/4, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49000

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering

Yuliia Ulianovska, University of Customs and Finance Vernadskoho str., 2/4, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49000

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering

Tetiana Yakovenko, Dnipro University of Technology D. Yavornytskoho ave., 19, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49005

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economics and Economic Cybernetics

References

  1. Loboichenko, V. (2019). Development of the procedure of identification of hazardous factors at low-tonnage chemical production objects. Problems of Emergency Situations, 2 (30), 176–186. Available at: http://repositsc.nuczu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/10608/1/15loboychenko.pdf
  2. Minimum standards for protection, gender and inclusion in emergencies (2018). International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Geneva, 116. Available at: https://media.ifrc.org/ifrc/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/11/Minimum-standards-for-protection-gender-and-inclusion-in-emergencies-LR.pdf
  3. Portyanko, T. M., Rotte, S. V., Pshenyshnaia, N. M. (2018). Analysis of historical aspects of development of technogenic safety. Humanitarnyi visnyk. Ser.: Istorychni nauky, 12, 128–136.
  4. Jung, S., Woo, J., Kang, C. (2020). Analysis of severe industrial accidents caused by hazardous chemicals in South Korea from January 2008 to June 2018. Safety Science, 124, 104580. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104580
  5. Natural catastrophes and man-made disasters in 2018: “secondary” perils on the frontline (2019). Swiss Re Institute. No. 2/2019. Available at: https://www.swissre.com/dam/jcr:c37eb0e4-c0b9-4a9f-9954-3d0bb4339bfd/sigma2_2019_en.pdf
  6. Adikaram, K. K. N. B., Nawarathna, C. M. (2018). Business sector preparedness in disaster management: case study with businesses in Southern Sri Lanka in both aspects of natural and technological disasters. Procedia Engineering, 212, 918–920. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.118
  7. Murray, S. L., Harputlu, E., Mentzer, R. A., Mannan, M. S. (2014). Modeling operators' emergency response time for chemical processing operations. Journal of Emergency Management, 12 (6), 479. doi: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2014.0211
  8. Su, J., Guo, C., Zang, H., Yang, F., Huang, D., Gao, X., Zhao, Y. (2018). A multi-setpoint delay-timer alarming strategy for industrial alarm monitoring. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 54, 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2018.02.004
  9. Zhang, Z.-X., Wang, L., Wang, Y.-M. (2018). An Emergency Decision Making Method Based on Prospect Theory for Different Emergency Situations. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 9 (3), 407–420. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-018-0173-x
  10. Longo, F., Nicoletti, L., Padovano, A. (2019). Emergency preparedness in industrial plants: A forward-looking solution based on industry 4.0 enabling technologies. Computers in Industry, 105, 99–122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.12.003
  11. Zharikova, M., Sherstjuk, V. (2015). Development of the model of natural emergencies in decision support system. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (4 (73)), 62–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.37801
  12. Katsman, M. D., Rodkevich, O. G. (2015). Informative model of authentication ecologically of extraordinary near-accidents. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu Povitrianykh Syl, 1 (42), 126–131. Available at: http://www.hups.mil.gov.ua/periodic-app/article/4167
  13. Rogozin, A. S., Homenko, V. S. (2011). A mathematical model of liquidation of emergency situations. Problemy nadzvychainykh sytuatsiy, 14, 143–147. Available at: https://nuczu.edu.ua/sciencearchive/ProblemsOfEmergencies/vol14/Rogozin.pdf
  14. Grant, E., Salmon, P. M., Stevens, N. J., Goode, N., Read, G. J. (2018). Back to the future: What do accident causation models tell us about accident prediction? Safety Science, 104, 99–109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.018
  15. Lytvyn, V. V., Darevych, R. R., Dosyn, D. G., Melnyk, A. S., Mazur, A. A. (2011). Searching for Relevant Precedent Based on Adaptive Ontology. Shtuchnyi intelekt, 2, 35–44. Available at: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/58840
  16. Bimba, A. T., Idris, N., Al-Hunaiyyan, A., Mahmud, R. B., Abdelaziz, A., Khan, S., Chang, V. (2016). Towards knowledge modeling and manipulation technologies: A survey. International Journal of Information Management, 36 (6), 857–871. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.022
  17. Strelec, V. M., Loboichenko, V. M. (2013). Improvement in the method of expert estimates for the occupational risk. Problemy nadzvychainykh sytuatsiy, 17, 198–204. Available at: https://nuczu.edu.ua/sciencearchive/ProblemsOfEmergencies/vol17/23.pdf
  18. Pro identyfikatsiyu ta deklaruvannia bezpeky obiektiv pidvyshchenoi nebezpeky. Postanova vid 11.07.2002 No. 956. Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy. Available at: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/shou/956-2002-%D0%BF/page
  19. Melihov, A. N., Bershteyn, L. S., Korovin, S. Ya. (1990). Situatsionnye sovetuyushchie sistemy s nechetkoy logikoy. Moscow, 272.
  20. Ulianovskaya, Yu. (2016). Information technology for treatment of results expert estimation with fuzzy character input data. An International Quarterly Journal on Economics of Technology and Modelling Processes, 5 (4), 55–60. Available at: https://www.infona.pl/resource/bwmeta1.element.baztech-dc538a41-176b-4ecf-8157-22272a913466

Downloads

Published

2020-04-30

How to Cite

Yakovenko, V., Ulianovska, Y., & Yakovenko, T. (2020). The models of anthropogenic emergencies for decision support systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(4 (104), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.201736

Issue

Section

Mathematics and Cybernetics - applied aspects