PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN RQAAD TERHADAP MOTIVASI BELAJAR DAN KETERAMPILAN METAKOGNITIF MAHASISWA MATA KULIAH STRATEGI BELAJAR MENGAJAR BIOLOGI

Bea Hana Siswati, Slamet Hariyadi, Aloysius Duran Corebima

Abstract


Abstrak. Pembelajaran yang bermakna adalah pembelajaran yang dapat dengan mudah dipahami oleh peserta didik dan informasi-informasi yang diperoleh bisa bertahan lama di dalam Long Term Memory (LTM) peserta didik. Pembelajaran di masa pandemic Covid-19 yang dilakukan secara daring tentu tidak berbeda dengan pembelajaran yang dilakukan secara luring. Suatu model/strategi pembelajaran tetap bisa digunakan dalam pembelajaran, termasuk juga model pembelajaran RQAAD (Reading, Questioning, Answering, Analyzing, Discussing). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran RQAAD terhadap motivasi belajar dan keterampilan metakognisi mahasiswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian kuasi eksperimen yang membandingkan kelas yang diberi perlakuan menggunakan model pembelajaran RQAAD dan yang tidak menggunakannya. Motivasi belajar mahasiswa diukur dengan skala motivasi sedangkan keterampilan metakognitif diukur dengan rubrik keterampilan metakognitif. Penelitian dilakukan pada mahasiswa semester 3 tahun akademik 2020/2021 yang terdiri dari 62 mahasiswa. Pembelajaran RQAAD terbukti berpengaruh signifikan terhadap motivasi belajar dan keterampilan metakognitif mahasiswa yang menempuh matakuliah Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Rerata skor terkoreksi motivasi belajar kelas eksperimen 5,61 persen lebih tinggi dari kelas kontrol dan rerata terkoreksi keterampilan metakognitif kelas eksperimen 16,01 persen lebih tinggi dibanding kelas kontrol.

Abstract. Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic that is done online is certainly no different from learning that is done offline. A learning model/strategy can still be used in learning, including the RQAAD (Reading, Questioning, Answering, Analyzing, Discussing) learning model. This study aims to determine the effect of the RQAAD learning model on student motivation and metacognitive skills. The research method used is quasi-experimental by comparing classes that are treated using the RQAAD learning model and those who do not. Student learning motivation is measured by the motivation scale while metacognitive skills are measured by the metacognitive skills rubric. The research was conducted on 3rd semester students of the 2020/2021 academic year consisting of 62 students. Learning RQAAD proved to have a significant effect on learning motivation and metacognitive skills of students taking Biology Teaching and Learning Strategies Course. The mean score of corrected learning motivation in the experimental class is 5.61 percent higher than the control class and the average corrected metacognitive skill in the experimental class is 16.01 percent higher than the control class.


Keywords


Pembelajaran RQAAD; Motivasi Belajar; Keterampilan Metakognitif; Strategi Belajar Mengajar

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aflalo, E. (2018). Students generating questions as a way of learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 1-13.

Akpunar, B. (2011). The analysis of the concept of cognition and metacognition in terms of the philosophy of mind. Turkish Studies - International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 6(4), 353-365

Arridha, A.A. & Narius, D. (2019). An Analysis of Student's Reading Motivation in Reading Subject at English Department of Universitas Negeri Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 8 (3).

Bakar, R. (2014). The effect of learning motivation on student’s productive competencies in vocational high school, west Sumatra. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 4(6),722-732.

Chauhan, A., & Singh, N. (2014). Metacognition: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research, 3(3), 21–22.

Chin, C. & Osborne, J. (2008). Students' questions: a potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44 (1), 1-39.

Corebima, A.D. (2009). Metacognitive skill measurement integrated in achievement test. Third International Conference on Science and Mathematics Education. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=12596119987386130601&hl=en&oi=scholar

Cuccio‐Schirripa, S. & Steiner, H.E. (2000). Enhancement and analysis of science question level for middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 210–224.

Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In: Resnick, L.B., (Ed.), The Nature of Intelligence, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, 231-235.

Gibbens, B. (2019). Measuring student motivation in an introductory biology class. The American Biology Teacher, 81(1), 20– 26.

Goldschmidt, K. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic: Technology use to Support the Wellbeing of Children. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 53. DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.04.013.

Gredler, M.E., Broussard, S.C., & Garrison, M.E.B. (2009). The relationship between classroom motivation and academic achievement in elementary school aged children. Family and Consumer Science Research Journal. 33,106-120.

Guay, F., Chanal, J., Ratelle, C.F., Marsh, H.W., Larose, S., & Boivin, M. (2010). Intrinsic, identified, and controlled types of motivation for school subjects in young elementary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 711– 735.

Karakelle, S., & Saraç, S. (2010). Üst biliş hakkında bir gözden geçirme: Üstbiliş çalışmaları mı yoksa üst bilişsel yaklaşım mı? Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 13(26), 45-60.

Menggo, S., Ketut, S. & Made, R. (2013). The Effect of Discussion Technique and English Learning Motivation Toward Students’ Speaking Ability. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 1.

Pintrich, R. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33 -40.

Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2009). Promoting selfdetermined school engagement; motivation, learning and well-being. In Wentzel KR, Wigfield A. (Eds.). Handbook of motivation at school. New York: Routledge. 171-196.

Sáiz, M. M. C., & Carbonero, M. M. Á. (2017). Metacognitive precursors: An analysis in children with different disabilities. Brain Sciences, 7(10), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7100136

Sonowal, M., & Kalita, M. (2017). A study on metacognitive awareness and academic achievement of higher secondary level students of Dibrugarh town of Assam, India. TheClarion: International Multidisciplinary Journal, 6 (1), 69-74. https://doi.org/10.5958/2277-937X.2017.00012.0

Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W., & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97,468–483.

Verawardina, U., Asnur, L., Lubis, A.L., dkk. (2020). Reviewing Online Learning Facing the Covid-19 Outbreak. Journal of Talent Development and Excellence, 12 (3s), 385-392.

Yasir, M., Fikriyah, A., Qomariyah, N. & Haq, A.T.H. (2020). Metacognitiveskill on students of science education study program: Evaluation from answering biological questions. JPBI (Jurnal PendidikanBiologi Indonesia), 6 (1), 157-164.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um052v12i2p129-135

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Biology Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang,Building O-5 Jl. Cakrawala No.2 Malang 65145 Tel / Fax. (0341) 588077 (direct), (0341) 551312 line 262

E-mail: jpb.journal@um.ac.id

Web: s.id/JPB

 

View My Stats