Writing proficiency of Saudi EFL learners: Examining the impact of Lexical diversity

Ahmad Alshehri

Abstract


The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of lexical diversity on writing proficiency of Saudi EFL learners. Seventy-five Saudi EFL learners at the tertiary stage took part in this study (39 in level 2 and 36 in level 7). Their writing work is assessed and analysed using Text Inspector (a web-based language analysis tool). The results show that the lexical diversity of the participants lies within the normal range of second language learners. The findings also show a significant positive correlation between lexical diversity and writing proficiency. However, significant differences in lexical diversity or writing proficiency attributable to different academic levels could not be established. These results suggest that attention should be paid to vocabulary, as it is crucial to language learning. However, further research is needed to investigate the impact of lexical diversity on writing skill using different measures of lexical diversity.


Keywords


Saudi EFL learners; writing proficiency; vocabulary; speaking; writing; grammar

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. A & C Black.‏

Al-Masrai, A., & Milton, J. (2012). The vocabulary knowledge of university students in Saudi Arabia. TESOL Arabia Perspectives, 19(3), 13-19.

Al-Nujaidi, A. H. (2003). Relationship between vocabulary size, reading strategies, and reading comprehension of EFL learners in Saudi Arabia (Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University).‏

Al-Seghayer, K. (2017). Reality and challenges of TEFL in 21stst-century. Saudi Arabia. Riyadh: Hala Print Co.

Altalhab, S. (2019). The Vocabulary Knowledge of Saudi EFL Tertiary Students. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p55.‏

Azodi, N., Karimi, F., & Vaezi, R. (2014). Measuring the Lexical Richness of Productive Vocabulary in Iranian EFL University Students' Writing Performance. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 4(9). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.9.1837-1849.‏

Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Understanding expert ratings of essay quality: Coh-Metrix analyses of first and second language writing. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 21(2-3), 170-191. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCEELL.2011.040197.

deBoer, F. (2014). Evaluating the comparability of two measures of lexical diversity. System, 47, 139-–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.10.008.

Durán, P., Malvern, D., Richards, B., & Chipere, N. (2004). Developmental trends in lexical diversity. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 220–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.220.‏

Failasofah, F., & Alkhrisheh, H. T. D. (2018). Measuring Indonesian students’ lexical diversity and lexical sophistication. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 97-107.

Frear, M. M. W., & Bitchener, J. (2015). The effects of cognitive task complexity on writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.009.

Higginbotham, G., & Reid, J. (2019). The lexical sophistication of second language learners’ academic essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.002‏.

Jarvis, S. (2002). Short texts, best-fitting curves, and new measures of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19(1), 57-84. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt220oa.‏

Koizumi, R., & In'’nami, Y. (2012). Effects of text length on lexical diversity measures: Using short texts with less than 200 tokens. System, 40(4), 554-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.10.012.‏

Laufer, B. (2003). The influence of L2 on L1 collocational knowledge and on L1 lexical diversity in free written expression. Effects of the second language on the first, 19, 31.‏

Malvern, D., & Richards, B. (2002). Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language testing, 19(1), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt221oa.‏

Malvern, D., Richards, B., Chipere, N., & Durán, P. (2004). Lexical diversity and language development. New York: Palgrave Macmillan..

McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2007). vocd: A theoretical and empirical evaluation. Language Testing, 24(4), 459-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207080767.‏

McKee, G., Malvern, D., & Richards, B. (2000). Measuring vocabulary diversity using dedicated software. Literary and linguistic computing, 15(3), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/15.3.323.‏

McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., McCarthy, P. M., & Graesser, A. C. (2010). Coh-Metrix: Capturing linguistic features of cohesion. Discourse Processes, 47(4), 292-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902959943.‏

Meara, P., & Miralpeix, I. (2016). Tools for researching vocabulary. Multilingual Matters.

Mellor, A. (2010). Automatic essay scoring for low level learners of English as a second language. Swansea University (United Kingdom).

Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition, (Vol. 45)45. Multilingual Matters.‏

Nation, I. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?. Canadian modern language review, 63(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59.‏

Nation, I. S. P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9–13.‏

Nation, I. S., & Webb, S. A. (2011). Researching and analyzing vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning.‏

Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UkUK: Cambridge University Press.

Olinghouse, N. G., & Wilson, J. (2013). The relationship between vocabulary and writing quality in three genres. Reading and Writing, 26(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9392-5.‏

Pearson, P. D., Hiebert, E. H., & Kamil, M. L. (2007). Vocabulary assessment: What we know and what we need to learn. Reading research quarterly, 42(2), 282-296. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.42.2.4.‏

Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Read, J. (2007). Second language vocabulary assessment: Current practices and new directions. International Journal of English Studies, 7(2), 105–126.‏

Ryoo, Y. S. (2018). Comparing lexical diversity and lexical sophistication in Korean EFL writing: Topic and text length. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 63-87.

Sadeghi, K., & Dilmaghani, S. K. (2013). The relationship between lexical diversity and genre in Iranian EFL learners' writings. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(2), 328. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.2.328-334.

Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual, Springer.

Wang, X. (2014). The relationship between lexical diversity and EFL writing proficiency. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 9.

Wimmer, G., & Altmann, G. (1999). On vocabulary richness. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 6(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1076/jqul.6.1.1.4148.‏

Yu, G. (2010). Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances. Applied linguistics, 31(2), 236-259. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp024.‏

Zhan-Xiang, M. (2004). The necessity of intensifying English vocabulary teaching in the remote minority area college English teaching. Asian EFL Journal, 6(2), 221-233.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies