Home  /  Tadulako Law Review  /  Vol: 5 Núm: 2 Par: 0 (2020)  /  Article
ARTICLE
TITLE

AUTHORITY OF SUPERVISORY APPARATUS INTERNAL GOVERNMENT OR APIP IN DETERMINING STATE LOSSES DUE TO CORRUPTION IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS

SUMMARY

This time, there is often debate between two financial supervisory institutions, namely between APIP (Supervisory Apparatus Internal Government) and BPK (Financial Audit Institutions) relating to the existence of the same authority in these two supervisory institutions. This authority is related to the calculation of state losses as regulated in Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 31 / PUUX / 2012 related to testing Law No. 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission or the KPK against the Indonesia Constitution 1945 or UUD 1945. The decision states that the KPK can not only coordinate with the BPK and BPKP (Supervisory Financial and Development) in terms of proof of corruption but can also coordinate with other agencies, it can even prove itself apart from the findings of the BKP and BPKP. Based on this background, the problem in this research is how is the authority of APIP in calculating state losses due to corruption in Local Government agencies? The problem approach in this research is normative legal research, normatively is the approach by collecting and studying, documents, and applicable laws and regulations, which are related to the determination of state losses by APIP.The results of the research shows that based on Article 50 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 60 Year 2008 concerning Government Internal Control Systems, APIP can conduct audits with specific objectives in order to calculate the state losses due to corruption. However, in calculating state losses, APIP must get a request from the legal apparatus first as stated in the cooperation agreement made by the Inspectorate and BPKP as APIP. Based on these rules, APIP only has a mandate from the legal apparatus so that the audit results of the APIP is informative and do not constitute a state administration decision. Therefore based on the Supreme Court Circular No. 4 of 2016 concerning the Imposition of the 2016 Supreme Court Chamber Room Plenary Meeting Results as a guideline for the implementation of duties for the court, APIP is only authorized to calculate state losses and can only determine state losses by BPK.

 Articles related

Putu Gede Arya Sumerta Yasa, Cokorda Dalem Dahana    

Taxes as a source of State revenue are very important objects because most of the types of State revenue come from taxes. Due to this condition, it is necessary to have firm regulation for both tax authorities and taxpayers to maximize revenue from the t... see more

Revista: Kertha Patrika

Iskandar Iskandar    

The occurrence of CCN in the procedure of issuing natural resources licensing is partly caused by the weakness of supervision aspect. In fact, the purpose of supervision is basically intended to prevent the occurrence of CCN. This paper is intended to ex... see more

Revista: Yuridika

Ni Luh Gede Astariyani, Ni Putu Wiwin Setyari, Bagus Hermanto    

This study intends to examine the authority of local governments to regulate regional policies on tourism development master plan. This paper examines the legal issues related to the basis of the authority from philosophical, sociological, and juridical ... see more

Revista: Kertha Patrika

Sri Winarsi,Sri Hajati,Oemar Moechthar 10.20884/1.jdh.2018.18.3.1892    

After the issuance of Law Number 23 Year 2014 jo. Law Number 9 Year 2015 on Regional Government, the affairs of local government in the field of land services, especially agriculture and plantations have shifted the authority of regulation which is diffe... see more


Xaviera Qatrunnada Djana Sudjati,Dewi Cahyandari 10.20884/1.jdh.2021.21.3.3070    

The administrative court is given the authority to review the request for review of abuse of authority according to the legislation and general principles of good governance as the two touchstones. This review may serve as a testing benchmark to discuss ... see more